Date: December 23rd, 2007 1:31 AM
Author: Amber razzle-dazzle pervert
Subject: Twice now in the past couple of days. Here it is!
Date: December 23rd, 2007 12:40 AM
Author: *NYCFan*
I am not the only one who finds the Princeton Review's approach to rankings pathetic... even offensive.
After a fitful effort a few years back, they have abandoned any serious attempt to compare schools, and have settled for headline-grabbing and statistically-dubious assertions that this school or that is the best "drinking school" or the home of the most "sandal-wearers".
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=735641&forum_id=1#9064962)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: December 23rd, 2007 12:52 AM
Author: rzctx
Subject: Perhaps you should tell the harvard crimson
They refer to the Princeton Review rankings often (and in a very positive light).
LOL. It doesn't stop you from citing them when to your advantage! The proof is in the pudding LIAR.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=735641&forum_id=1#9064982)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: December 23rd, 2007 1:11 AM
Author: *NYCFan*
They do no such thing.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=735641&forum_id=1#9064993)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: December 23rd, 2007 1:28 AM
Author: rzctx
Subject: NYCFan HAS BEEN CAUGHT IN YET ANOTHER LIE
Check for yourself old man. In the harvard crimson's front page celebration announcement of their #2 US Ranking, they also take the time to pump themselves up with Princeton Review Rankings.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=519439
Bottom Line: YOU LIED AGAIN
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=735641&forum_id=1#9065013)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=735659&forum_id=1#9065014)