"

We hold, in accord with the New Hampshire Supreme

Court, that state-law claims stemming from the storage

and disposal of a car, once towing has ended, are not

sufficiently connected to a motor carrier’s service with

respect to the transportation of property to warrant pre-

emption under §14501(c)(1). The New Hampshire law in

point regulates no towing services, no carriage of prop-

erty. Instead, it trains on custodians of stored vehicles

seeking to sell them. Congress did not displace the State’s

regulation of that activity by any federal prescription."

THANK GOD THEY CLEARED THAT UP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2264317&forum_id=2#23258629)