\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Healthcare Question re: Preexisting Conditions

So, my understanding is that, once all the provisions of the...
charismatic sienna piazza
  07/03/12
No, they are given a discretionary pricing band but it's ver...
Cerise wonderful newt
  07/03/12
I'm happy about this, even though I know premiums will be mu...
Self-centered resort
  07/03/12
Why? You want to see the insurance market collapse?
violent gas station french chef
  07/03/12
So, I'm wondering what this will come down to in practice. ...
charismatic sienna piazza
  07/03/12
the high-end band can only be 3x the low end, right? Which g...
Beady-eyed Personal Credit Line
  07/03/12
as i understand it, they will be phasing the 3:1 ratio out.
Cerise wonderful newt
  07/03/12
what will the price discrim ceiling be then?
Beady-eyed Personal Credit Line
  07/03/12
you're right in that 2704 has the de jure 3:1 max ceiling, b...
Cerise wonderful newt
  07/03/12
exactly. (b) will be very limited, so it's not the high of a...
Cerise wonderful newt
  07/03/12


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:36 PM
Author: charismatic sienna piazza

So, my understanding is that, once all the provisions of the ACA are in effect, insurers will not be able to deny coverage based on a preexisting condition.

However, will they still be able to set prices based on preexisting conditions? Like, if you get cancer and then try to get insurance, can they say "sure we'll cover you, but your premiums are going to be $10,000/month"?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008836)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:37 PM
Author: Cerise wonderful newt

No, they are given a discretionary pricing band but it's very limited. A ban of price discrimination means you can't price based on individual risk factors, pre-existing conditions being one such (very material) risk factor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008843)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:41 PM
Author: Self-centered resort

I'm happy about this, even though I know premiums will be much higher for everyone as a result.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008866)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:44 PM
Author: violent gas station french chef

Why? You want to see the insurance market collapse?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008881)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:47 PM
Author: charismatic sienna piazza

So, I'm wondering what this will come down to in practice.

In other words, what is the difference in premium amount that you're risking by not carrying insurance? If you're perfectly healthy, it seems like the only reason to carry insurance is to avoid (a) the risk of getting emergency-pwned before you can sign up for insurance, or (b) the risk of having to pay at the high-end of the premium band of you get a dreaded disease and need to sign up for insurance.

Depending on the difference between the no-insurance penalty and your healthy premiumn, and the cost of high-end premiums, it may or may not be a risk people are willing to take.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008898)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:50 PM
Author: Beady-eyed Personal Credit Line

the high-end band can only be 3x the low end, right? Which gives you a quant for b).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008924)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:51 PM
Author: Cerise wonderful newt

as i understand it, they will be phasing the 3:1 ratio out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008932)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:52 PM
Author: Beady-eyed Personal Credit Line

what will the price discrim ceiling be then?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008942)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 2:08 PM
Author: Cerise wonderful newt

you're right in that 2704 has the de jure 3:1 max ceiling, but from what i understand there are other provisions which i'm going to look into later off work that work in conjunction with IRS 223 that limit the amount of out-of-pocket and which can be unilaterally amended each year without congressional approval. This is the means to effectively cap and phase out the de facto ceiling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21009036)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:51 PM
Author: Cerise wonderful newt

exactly. (b) will be very limited, so it's not the high of a risk, especially considering at that point the cost of the underlying health care you seek will likely far outweigh the premium. (a) is a concern and is really the only enforcement mechanism (making sign-up strenuous and not apply retroactively) left that will keep people from opting out until the last minute, in which case the insurance system will eventually collapse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008927)