Healthcare Question re: Preexisting Conditions
| charismatic sienna piazza | 07/03/12 | | Cerise wonderful newt | 07/03/12 | | Self-centered resort | 07/03/12 | | violent gas station french chef | 07/03/12 | | charismatic sienna piazza | 07/03/12 | | Beady-eyed Personal Credit Line | 07/03/12 | | Cerise wonderful newt | 07/03/12 | | Beady-eyed Personal Credit Line | 07/03/12 | | Cerise wonderful newt | 07/03/12 | | Cerise wonderful newt | 07/03/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:36 PM Author: charismatic sienna piazza
So, my understanding is that, once all the provisions of the ACA are in effect, insurers will not be able to deny coverage based on a preexisting condition.
However, will they still be able to set prices based on preexisting conditions? Like, if you get cancer and then try to get insurance, can they say "sure we'll cover you, but your premiums are going to be $10,000/month"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008836)
|
 |
Date: July 3rd, 2012 1:47 PM Author: charismatic sienna piazza
So, I'm wondering what this will come down to in practice.
In other words, what is the difference in premium amount that you're risking by not carrying insurance? If you're perfectly healthy, it seems like the only reason to carry insurance is to avoid (a) the risk of getting emergency-pwned before you can sign up for insurance, or (b) the risk of having to pay at the high-end of the premium band of you get a dreaded disease and need to sign up for insurance.
Depending on the difference between the no-insurance penalty and your healthy premiumn, and the cost of high-end premiums, it may or may not be a risk people are willing to take.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985469&forum_id=2#21008898) |
|
|