Why Didn't DPW Get Facebook IPO?
| hairraiser office crotch | 02/02/12 | | hairraiser office crotch | 02/02/12 | | bespoke flickering senate voyeur | 02/02/12 | | sexy fiercely-loyal gaming laptop | 02/02/12 | | hairraiser office crotch | 02/02/12 | | lime dysfunction | 02/02/12 | | hairraiser office crotch | 02/02/12 | | primrose meetinghouse dog poop | 02/03/12 | | vigorous chapel fortuitous meteor | 02/03/12 | | primrose meetinghouse dog poop | 02/03/12 | | vigorous chapel fortuitous meteor | 02/03/12 | | odious misunderstood round eye ticket booth | 02/03/12 | | Mahogany casino kitty cat | 02/03/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 2nd, 2012 10:13 AM Author: hairraiser office crotch
Morgan Stanley was the lead underwriter. Why wasn't DPW counsel to MS? (STB was instead.)
DPW is as in bed with MS as S&C is with Goldman. They serve as Morgan's premier outside counsel. DPW even has offices in Menlo Park, next to FB.
Explain brothers.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863538&forum_id=2#19881708) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2012 10:34 AM Author: hairraiser office crotch
I guess I forgot that this chatblog has approximately 0.7 biglawyers.
Maybe I should go poast on BLB.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863538&forum_id=2#19881783)
|
Date: February 2nd, 2012 11:55 AM Author: sexy fiercely-loyal gaming laptop
I was wondering the same thing. My guess is that the STB partners work on big time IPOs like google and ebay won out.
STB is a beast these days.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863538&forum_id=2#19882069) |
 |
Date: February 3rd, 2012 11:53 AM Author: vigorous chapel fortuitous meteor
Goldman’s relationship with Facebook, however, has been strained.
The firm, which led a $1.5 billion investment in the social network in January 2011, was privately criticized by Facebook for allegedly botching the private placement, after word of the deal was reported by DealBook, people with knowledge of the matter have said. The news coverage drew the scrutiny of regulators, eventually leading Goldman to limit its offering to its foreign private wealth clients. The development was seen as an embarrassment for the bank and frustrated Facebook’s management team, which has tried to keep its affairs private, these people said.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863538&forum_id=2#19887702) |
|
|