The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Shit company TerraCom says it was "hacked" with Google searches.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:43 AM Author: lilac point coldplay fan Summary: Some reporters were poking around on Google. They found social security numbers and other sensitive data on TerraCom's website. They tell TerraCom, which then flips out and makes a bunch of silly legal threats, including this gem:
"Because the Scripps Hackers have put the Companies in the position of having to incur the costs of potentially complying with more than 20 state data breach notification laws, the Companies are likely to look to Scripps to reimburse them for those costs."
Video: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/privacy-on-the-line/privacy-on-the-line-how-we-got-this-story |
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:48 AM Author: Wonderful Disrespectful Institution lol what kind of retard ape logic is that
because their massive incompetence was exposed, they are trying to make those who exposed them liable? |
 |
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:50 AM Author: Talented rehab any lawyer filing that would instantly be disbarred (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23254913) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 11:56 AM Author: Wonderful Disrespectful Institution (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23254945) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:07 PM Author: soggy resort patrolman Didn't this happen when a guy found a list of iPad users email adresses in att's website? Now he's in jail. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255007) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:09 PM Author: rebellious fishy property pretty sure the DMCA and the computer fraud/abuse act are extremely broad and can be used to prosecute anyone the government wants for basically any reason as long as an electronic device was at least marginally involved.
|
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:11 PM Author: Wonderful Disrespectful Institution Oh the scholarship! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255038) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:16 PM Author: self-centered arousing church building yes.
potentially a porn company could sue you under the same logic for accessing images you didn't have links to. for example, suppose you found a link on a porn site to
https://www.pornsite.com/album/img1.jpg
and no other images links were publicly available to non paying customers.
if you manually change the last digit in the URL so it reads
https://www.pornsite.com/album/img2.jpg
and it allows you access to the image, you've done the same thing the at&t "hacker" did and you could be prosecuted for violating the terms of service of the porn site and computer fraud and abuse. |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:17 PM Author: ivory library this. 4 years in fed pen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255056) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:20 PM Author: Free-loading Toaster Titcr. I literally committed thousands of felonies as a kid just by playing around with my computer to figure out how shit works. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255069) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:22 PM Author: soggy resort patrolman Am I the only one who clicked on the links only to be mildly disappointed? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255080) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:23 PM Author: unhinged bisexual genital piercing yes, because i was violently disappointed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255082) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:24 PM Author: self-centered arousing church building haha, should have put an s in for once (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255085) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:15 PM Author: ivory library this is the same thing weev did and he's serving 4 years in prison for it. our computer laws, both civil and criminal, are beyond retarded.
http://www.dailydot.com/news/andrew-weev-aurenheimer-solitary-prison-tweets/ |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:16 PM Author: rebellious fishy property it's not the laws that are retarded, but the jurors willing to return guilty verdicts on them. where are the jury nullification dudes who would hang or acquit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255050) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:16 PM Author: ivory library have you ever tried talking to your boomer parents about the internet and how computers work? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255053) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:18 PM Author: unhinged bisexual genital piercing me: what kind of comp did you buy?
dad: fuck you hacker chink! you just want to steal my boa account info and pay off your $400K claremont student loans! |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:18 PM Author: self-centered arousing church building jurors are retards but who is making these laws? who is choosing to prosecute people for personal glory and career advancement? this is another case of fear-mongering law makers and faggot prosecutors gone amok. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255061) |
|
Date: May 23rd, 2013 12:21 PM Author: ivory library the law in this case is the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which was written in fucking 1984 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2263855&forum_id=2#23255072) |