\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

China Fucked its Own Face w/ Poor Infrastructure Investments

To shore up the economy, China could further reduce interest...
Chestnut chad
  01/07/16
but but the infrastructure (TT)
Carnelian alpha
  01/07/16
...
Chestnut chad
  01/07/16
...
Passionate laser beams
  01/07/16
...
Vivacious rebellious clown pervert
  01/07/16
They never transitioned to a consumer-oriented service econo...
Multi-colored bonkers stag film
  01/07/16
what good would it do to cut interest rates when they have h...
talking halford pozpig
  01/07/16
Let me make sure I'm clear on this: your argument is that Ch...
fluffy ape
  01/07/16
I think he's trying to say that without a proper consumer ba...
Multi-colored bonkers stag film
  01/07/16
i'm saying the residential market in china is insufficient t...
talking halford pozpig
  01/07/16
I am familiar with the ghost city phenomenon. Now please li...
fluffy ape
  01/07/16
I think the bigger issue in China is commercial real estate....
Curious brass center hissy fit
  01/07/16
you're arguing against a position i haven't taken. but you c...
talking halford pozpig
  01/07/16
All of these units have been paid for bro. These people are...
fluffy ape
  01/07/16
you don't understand how taking billions of dollars in cash,...
hateful garnet round eye
  01/07/16
I'd be interested in reading /r/AsianMasulinity's take on al...
sickened lodge volcanic crater
  01/07/16
...
Chestnut chad
  01/07/16
WHITTTEY
Stirring Theatre Marketing Idea
  01/07/16
as opposed to superior anglo infrastructure
nyuug
  12/01/25
yearly conflagrations destroying billions in infrastructure ...
nyuug
  12/01/25
...
nyuug
  12/01/25
I wonder if OP was a Trump supporter in 2016
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  12/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: Chestnut chad

To shore up the economy, China could further reduce interest rates so as to help the real estate market. It could also further increase its already considerable stimulus spending on infrastructure.

Still, while such measures might help in the short run, they would only add to one of China’s biggest problems in the long run: a huge overhang of debt that was used to finance poorly judged investments. Many of those investments, like high-speed rail lines built in smaller provincial capitals for political reasons, may struggle to generate enough of an economic return to cover the interest on the money that was borrowed to finance them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540189)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:19 AM
Author: Carnelian alpha

but but the infrastructure

(TT)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540284)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:21 AM
Author: Chestnut chad



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540294)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 11:52 AM
Author: Passionate laser beams



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540906)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 12:46 PM
Author: Vivacious rebellious clown pervert



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29541362)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:20 AM
Author: Multi-colored bonkers stag film

They never transitioned to a consumer-oriented service economy. A 50% savings rate combined with a lot of worthless infrastructure spending won't get you to the future. Devaluing the currency might help the exporters in the short-run, but in the long-run they need a stronger yuan to encourage consumer spending at home.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540289)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:22 AM
Author: talking halford pozpig

what good would it do to cut interest rates when they have hundreds of brand new residential towers sitting vacant? its not that people cant afford them. people actually own them since that's one of the only ways you can save money in china. but no one lives in them since theres simply not enough people to fill them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540301)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:29 AM
Author: fluffy ape

Let me make sure I'm clear on this: your argument is that China doesn't have enough people? Is that your final answer?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540333)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:32 AM
Author: Multi-colored bonkers stag film

I think he's trying to say that without a proper consumer banking industry people "invested" in certain assets as a means of simply storing value. I wonder if part of the problem is cultural.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540354)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:43 AM
Author: talking halford pozpig

i'm saying the residential market in china is insufficient to fill all the new residential towers they've built in the past 8 years:

http://www.news.com.au/finance/china-building-mega-cities-but-they-remain-empty-sparking-fears-of-housing-bubble-burst/story-e6frfm1i-1226611169281

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2005231/Chinas-ghost-towns-New-satellite-pictures-massive-skyscraper-cities-STILL-completely-empty.html

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Crisis-in-China:-64-million-empty-apartments-19459.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540410)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:48 AM
Author: fluffy ape

I am familiar with the ghost city phenomenon. Now please link to news suggesting that a mass default on these apartments is imminent. These people aren't getting liar loans.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540441)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:52 AM
Author: Curious brass center hissy fit

I think the bigger issue in China is commercial real estate. Lots of people are gobbling up residential real estate in major Chinese urban areas simply as a way to store cash, and don't care if it's not leased out or whatever.

Still, China knows they need to develop a consumer class, which is hard in a culture that's as tight fisted as they are. Your typical salaried family in China probably saves 90 cents of every dollar it earns.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540451)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:52 AM
Author: talking halford pozpig

you're arguing against a position i haven't taken. but you can't pay for housing developments when there's no market for it. cutting rates won't do any good because there's not enough people to fill them. all the $ spent on building these things will have to be written off

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540457)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 11:49 AM
Author: fluffy ape

All of these units have been paid for bro. These people aren't taking out mortgages. It is shitty that they are empty, but I just don't see how there are likely to be significant negative consequences in the immediate future. The trouble only comes when people invest their entire fortune in these places and then can't sell them to generate cash they need. I understand that many people have invested their entire net worths in these buildings, but not sure what ills that will reap in a communist country where people have at most one child and where there are strong norms about taking care of your parents.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540893)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 1:20 PM
Author: hateful garnet round eye

you don't understand how taking billions of dollars in cash, acquired largely through production and other useful, economy-building sources, and converting it into unproductive empty "real estate," which cannot produce income OR be sold at a profit AND is not needed for actual shelter, is a drain on the country's economy? they would have gotten more utility by lighting those yuan on fire.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29541599)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 10:54 AM
Author: sickened lodge volcanic crater

I'd be interested in reading /r/AsianMasulinity's take on all of this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540467)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 11:53 AM
Author: Chestnut chad



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29540913)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 7th, 2016 12:44 PM
Author: Stirring Theatre Marketing Idea

WHITTTEY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#29541342)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 4:45 PM
Author: nyuug (Gangnam WGWAG Playboy)

as opposed to superior anglo infrastructure

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#49475098)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 4:45 PM
Author: nyuug (Gangnam WGWAG Playboy)

yearly conflagrations destroying billions in infrastructure sounds like superior anglo culture to me

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2910459&forum_id=2#48534542

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#49475100)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 9:34 PM
Author: nyuug (Gangnam WGWAG Playboy)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#49475912)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 1st, 2025 4:47 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


I wonder if OP was a Trump supporter in 2016

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3089840&forum_id=2#49475105)