The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
COA clerk taking questions
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 2nd, 2012 9:14 PM Author: Flushed market (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19884840) |
Date: February 2nd, 2012 9:34 PM Author: insane rigor what are common kinds of cases (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19884978) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2012 10:30 PM Author: Flushed market we see a lot of appellate litigation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19885354) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2012 10:30 PM Author: Primrose fear-inspiring pervert stage (1L) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19885356) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2012 10:31 PM Author: insane rigor (guy who isnt funny) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19885367) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 6:58 AM Author: Flushed market the question could not have been serious, and so neither was my response (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887097) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:38 AM Author: insane rigor you sound like a huge faggot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887166) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:47 AM Author: Flushed market that hurts my feelings (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887180) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 2:55 PM Author: honey-headed tattoo why couldn't the question be serious? you seem unintelligent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19894320) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2012 10:58 PM Author: ocher codepig give me a paper topic for a litigation class (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19885611) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 12:19 AM Author: kink-friendly smoky meetinghouse alpha search the WL FPP database for circuit splits. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19886340) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 6:59 AM Author: Flushed market you are enrolled in a class called "litigation?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887099) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 6:57 AM Author: Flushed market still here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887095) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 6:59 AM Author: Mildly autistic obsidian psychic corner What are your thoughts on the 10th Circuit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887100) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2012 10:09 AM Author: Ultramarine Kitchen http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2012/04/18/08-17324.pdf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#20496811) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 6:59 AM Author: Mildly autistic obsidian psychic corner What are your thoughts on the 10th Circuit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887101) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 7:20 AM Author: Flushed market what about it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887109) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 7:24 AM Author: Mildly autistic obsidian psychic corner Is it more or less preftigious than the 5th? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887112) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 7:27 AM Author: Flushed market they are of equally middling prestige (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19887114) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 7:57 PM Author: Flushed market sup (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890558) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:05 PM Author: balding rigpig what is mandamus and when is it appropriate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890590) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:07 PM Author: Flushed market The authority given to the Supreme Court by the act establishing the judicial system of the United States to issue writs of mandamus to public officers appears not to be warranted by the Constitution.
It is emphatically the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret the rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the operation of each. |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:08 PM Author: balding rigpig nonresponsive (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890601) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:10 PM Author: Flushed market have you considered wikipedia (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890612) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:11 PM Author: balding rigpig what a fail thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890623) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:13 PM Author: Flushed market it's true, but it's not my fault. i don't understand why people ask stupid shit that has nothing to do with anything. I guess no one wants to be a clerk any more. i feel so inadequate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890633) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:20 PM Author: balding rigpig mandamus writs have nothing to do with COA clerking? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890674) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 8:26 PM Author: Flushed market why the fuck you would you use this opportunity to ask some vague bullshit question about substantive law that any mouth breather could work out with about four minutes and Google (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19890709) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 2:08 PM Author: Lime curious immigrant locale lol @ "use this opportunity"
I am a COA clerk too, but unlike you, I don't claim to possess untapped wisdom on topics you can't Google. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 2:43 PM Author: Flushed market you don't think you have specialized knowledge about, say, the clerkship hiring process, what clerking is like, and how appellate cases get decided? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19894217) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2012 9:57 PM Author: Peach Useless Brakes You still around? I was curious what you'd think about this situation. We had a recent appellate argument against the government. In years of litigation, the government has never cited any authority in support of a legal argument it kept making. It never cited any in its responsive brief. Then, for the first time ever, in oral argument, it whips out a footnote in a case which seems to support its theory, and we're caught completely off guard. Of course we have ways to distinguish it now, but werent able to do it in oral argument because it was never cited before. Are we just fucked? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19891235) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 6:54 AM Author: Flushed market See Fed. R. App. P. 28(j). May or may not technically fit within the language of the rule, but people abuse it to file "here's arguments I wish I had made earlier" letters all the time. No big deal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19892782) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2012 1:07 PM Author: Ultramarine Kitchen sees fucked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1863915&forum_id=2#19997429) |