The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
LOL, journal i submitted to 2 years ago finally responded
| irate stubborn pisswyrm | 02/04/12 |
| Heady rose telephone antidepressant drug | 02/04/12 |
| irate stubborn pisswyrm | 02/04/12 |
| Heady rose telephone antidepressant drug | 02/04/12 |
| galvanic reading party library | 02/04/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 4th, 2012 5:35 PM Author: irate stubborn pisswyrm they're actually interested in publishing it, if i make some revisions. too bad i already revised and got it published in a better journal in the meantime
should i even bother responding as a professional courtesy? when i last checked in - over a year ago - they promised a decision within 2 weeks. |
 |
Date: February 4th, 2012 5:36 PM Author: Heady rose telephone antidepressant drug We sent a manuscript to Nature, got a reply back in 2 weeks. Could be published by the end of the month. U mad? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865177&forum_id=2#19895504) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 5:42 PM Author: irate stubborn pisswyrm yeah. the peer review process for law journals is so slow and cumbersome that it makes cutting edge scholarship (as cutting edge as law scholarship can be, at least) difficult. you have to choose between getting out your research before it's outdated and trite or getting published in a publication that matters (as least as far as tenure goes) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865177&forum_id=2#19895538) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 5:48 PM Author: Heady rose telephone antidepressant drug TBF, bro, a lot of scientific journals also have ridiculous submission-to-publication lags. I feel ya. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865177&forum_id=2#19895578) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2012 7:07 PM Author: galvanic reading party library Yeah, no point in burning bridges. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865177&forum_id=2#19896097) |