RATE THIS ALPHA U-CHICAGO LAW STUDENT RESUME
| opaque base | 02/03/12 | | Burgundy filthpig toaster | 02/16/12 | | Multi-colored Abode Gaping | 02/16/12 | | opaque base | 11/05/15 | | opaque base | 04/21/12 | | Charismatic narrow-minded coldplay fan | 07/24/13 | | Thirsty Codepig Gaming Laptop | 02/03/12 | | opaque base | 02/15/12 | | Aquamarine goal in life stage | 02/03/12 | | Burgundy filthpig toaster | 02/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/02/12 | | racy school cafeteria | 02/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/21/12 | | Emerald erotic spot | 02/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 05/07/12 | | opaque base | 05/13/12 | | apoplectic maize crackhouse | 02/03/12 | | bateful yellow garrison azn | 02/15/12 | | Multi-colored Abode Gaping | 02/16/12 | | opaque base | 02/16/12 | | opaque base | 04/25/12 | | opaque base | 05/07/12 | | sexy center idiot | 02/15/12 | | Hyperventilating Spectacular Hissy Fit | 02/15/12 | | opaque base | 02/15/12 | | Multi-colored Abode Gaping | 02/16/12 | | outnumbered 180 dingle berry gas station | 02/16/12 | | blue swashbuckling tanning salon fat ankles | 02/16/12 | | opaque base | 02/16/12 | | Burgundy filthpig toaster | 02/16/12 | | Cracking smoky resort philosopher-king | 02/16/12 | | opaque base | 02/16/12 | | opaque base | 05/13/12 | | Buck-toothed crotch | 02/16/12 | | Curious Piazza Juggernaut | 04/02/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | crystalline zippy half-breed | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | crystalline zippy half-breed | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | crystalline zippy half-breed | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | crystalline zippy half-breed | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 05/07/12 | | Tan Marvelous Telephone | 05/07/12 | | opaque base | 05/07/12 | | Tan Marvelous Telephone | 05/07/12 | | opaque base | 05/07/12 | | Tan Marvelous Telephone | 05/07/12 | | Citrine startled milk | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | Citrine startled milk | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | Razzle-dazzle partner | 04/21/12 | | opaque base | 04/21/12 | | Topaz Church Building | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | Topaz Church Building | 04/03/12 | | opaque base | 04/03/12 | | Topaz Church Building | 04/03/12 | | Arousing jade cuckold gay wizard | 04/21/12 | | opaque base | 04/21/12 | | Medicated space cuck | 04/21/12 | | opaque base | 04/21/12 | | Medicated space cuck | 04/21/12 | | opaque base | 04/21/12 | | opaque base | 05/09/12 | | Emerald erotic spot | 05/13/12 | | opaque base | 05/13/12 | | Emerald erotic spot | 05/13/12 | | opaque base | 05/13/12 | | opaque base | 11/05/15 | | chest-beating diverse native | 11/06/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 3rd, 2012 7:13 PM Author: opaque base
EDUCATION:
University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, IL
J.D. expected, 2013
• The Chicago Journal of International Law, Member
• Law and Economics Society, President and Founder
- Organized student program “What is Law and Economics?” with the Honorable Judge Richard Posner and “Corporate Paternalism” with Professor Todd Henderson
• Law, Inc. (Law and Business Organization), Member
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
B.A. in Linguistics, Minor in Russian, 2009
• Study Abroad: St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia (one semester language program)
• Co-author of teaching resource “Conflict in Chechnya,” used in University of Colorado Geography classes
EXPERIENCE:
Center for Individual Rights, Washington, D.C.
Law Clerk, Summer 2011
• Researched issues regarding, among other things, voting rights and parental rights
• Wrote memoranda on legal issues pertaining to active cases
Burbank School District 111, Burbank, IL
Substitute Teacher, 2009-2010
St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia
English Teacher, Spring 2009
PUBLICATIONS:
Comment, “The Prosecution of Vlaams Belang and the European Convention on Human Rights,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Winter 2012 (acceptance pending).
“Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate,” (seeking publication).
“The Failure of State Building in Afghanistan,” (seeking publication).
LANGUAGES:
Native Arabic speaker, proficient in reading French and Russian, conversational French and Russian skills
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#19890356)
|
 |
Date: February 15th, 2012 4:13 PM Author: bateful yellow garrison azn
This was the best part:
Comment, “The Prosecution of Vlaams Belang and the European Convention on Human Rights,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Winter 2012 (acceptance pending).
“Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate,” (seeking publication).
“The Failure of State Building in Afghanistan,” (seeking publication).
Acceptance pending most likely means that it is a working paper.
Seeking publication???? LOL!!!!
This guy is probably more prestigious than Slim Shady Man though....tbf...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#19970116) |
Date: February 15th, 2012 2:23 PM Author: Hyperventilating Spectacular Hissy Fit
"- Organized student program “What is Law and Economics?” with the Honorable Judge Richard Posner and “Corporate Paternalism” with Professor Todd Henderson"
1L kiss-ass stroking professor egos and reserving a classroom so each prof can bore other 1Ls talking about his respective field of expertise for an hour or two.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#19969501) |
 |
Date: April 3rd, 2012 5:20 PM Author: crystalline zippy half-breed
Good short snappy title about something interesting. Don't be a current student. If you aren't a professor, try and make it sound like you have private practice experience touching on the topic of your paper. "I am an IP litigation associate at PRESTIGIOUS FIRM, here is a paper about SOMETHING IP RELATED" will get you read. "I am shiteating junior associate, here is a paper that will revolutionize AEDPA jurisprudence" not so much.
If you are really going to clerk for the CAAF, maybe try and write something related to the UMCJ or CAAF for your first article. You need to give some reason to think you are more of an authority than the average shiteater 3L.
Rack up at least a couple publications in lesser journals (albeit from name schools whenever possible)... even if it's the irregularly published Stanford Journal of Shiteating and the Law.
Also, if you post it on SSRN and get a bunch of downloads, that's a major plus.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#20383370) |
 |
Date: April 3rd, 2012 5:25 PM Author: opaque base
How many downloads is respectable for an SSRN paper?
Also, When you review potential papers for publication, do you confine yourself to Expresso? Some of the shit there is absolute garbage--the writing and analysis is just awful.
And how helpful is attach a professor recommending the article?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#20383401) |
 |
Date: April 3rd, 2012 5:29 PM Author: crystalline zippy half-breed
Yeah, we are almost exclusively expresso.
50 downloads is good.
Professor recommending is better than no professor recommending, but not that big a deal unless it's a big name dude. If you attach a rec from Akhil Amar, you will get a shot. If you attach a rec from Professor Shiteater, it will be whatever.
The absolute best thing to do is to somehow get a prof from my school to recommend it. I guess this could be possible if you have a REALLY GOOD relationship with a prof and that prof would be willing to send it to a prof at my school and have that prof forward it to me in a "hey, check this out, thought you guys might be interested" e-mail. That will likely work a lot better with secondary journals at prestigious schools than LR itself though.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#20383428) |
 |
Date: April 3rd, 2012 5:32 PM Author: opaque base
How do you determine whether something is worth considering for publication if there is no prof recommendation? You just look at the cover letter and resume and see if the paper is reasonably interesting? And do you ever try to aim at a theme for that month's journal publication?
Like look at this piece http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/content/articles/2012/01/Dreyfuss_65_Vand_L_Rev_249.pdf
It's utter shit. But then again its a note.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#20383448) |
 |
Date: May 7th, 2012 7:03 PM Author: Tan Marvelous Telephone
Being a life-long bully, I take pleasure in diminishing the accomplishments of my peers, so I've become intimately familiar with psychological frailties of the young. Here we have a classic example of "too big for his britches."
First off, any competent selection committee would sense this topic is preempted as fuck. I'm assuming this guy is actually on the Vanderbilt Law Review, because I'm sure they're smart enough not to let something like this through otherwise.
When you use language this over the top on the same topic that say, Jeremy Waldron just wrote about, you come off just as overconfident as you undoubtedly are. I'm always on the lookout for this attitude when we receive submissions from young associates and students.
Sadly, certain members of our selection committee haven't such discriminating tastes. But those of us who do, also have the necessary cynicism to completely dismiss their opinions. Creates extra work for the trustable people but you gotta do... I think next year we'll have some litmus test for this in selecting the committee members. Perhaps we'll show them this retarded article and see what they think
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#20638012) |
 |
Date: May 7th, 2012 7:13 PM Author: Tan Marvelous Telephone
We do expresso exclusively, though we take SSRN downloads into account. And no we don't just limit it to heavyweights, though professor reputation is weighed pretty heavily. Honestly a lot of times you end up getting better scholarship from less well known professors because they're not publishing with the frequency of a blogger (Richard Epstein).
From my perspective, submissions from judges are the most attractive. I find the legal publication transaction abhorrent in that it's entirely disconnected from demand for legal scholarship (students exchange resume line for publication opportunity for professor so they can stay on tenure track so they can continue contributing to the cycle of job desperation that yields all these "subject-matter" journals in the first place), so true practice-oriented pieces get a real bonus from me. And remember, "practice-oriented" is extremely rare because who the fuck has time to read law review articles when they're actually a practicing atty. Of course, if you're going to trial in front of a judge who just published, it's gotta be per se malpractice not to read the piece.
My advice to you is to try to get your judge to co-author a piece. We've gotten submissions like this in the past. Sometimes it's bullshit, sometimes it's legit, but they always get extra attention from us.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1864569&forum_id=2#20638057) |
|
|