@lenachen we're warming it up for you with our famous Santa Anas. Safe travels. 2:04 AM Feb 2nd via Twitter for iPhone in reply to lenachen

http://twitter.com/hugoschwyzer/status/32695933825187840

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#17204990)

http://nymag.com/health/features/60133/

Hugo Schwyzer is a history and gender studies professor at Pasadena City College in Pasadena, CA. He was circumcised in 2005 at age 37.

I wasn’t circumcised because my father felt it wasn’t medically necessary. He was born in Europe and wasn’t circumcised, and I think fathers have an almost primal urge for their sons to look like them. I was teased about my penis as a kid, but by high school it had mostly stopped. The bigger problems started when I become sexually active. Sometimes when I would have sex, the foreskin would tear. I had to go to the hospital once in my twenties, and the doctor recommended circumcision. I was horrified. It seemed like the classic example of the remedy being worse than the problem. And by that point I was proud of my uncircumcised penis. A few women thought it was weird, but in general I got positive feedback. I decided it was one of those defining features that no one should want to get rid of, like Cindy Crawford’s mole.

My mind started to change for a number of reasons. For one, the foreskin tearing didn’t get better, and I started to develop scar tissue. But the bigger issue was that I was in a relationship with the woman (at that time, she was my fiancée) who would go on to become my wife. Before her, I’d had something of a promiscuous past. I wanted to feel as if I was starting over sexually. No matter how many people I’d been with, she would be the only woman to see me like this.

Of course I was apprehensive about the surgery. I read some horror stories about surgical mistakes, that there would be a loss of sensation, the sex wouldn’t be as good, the healing process could be agonizing. But then I contacted a couple guys who had been circumcised as adults, largely because they were converting to Judaism, and I heard good things from them. The hardest part was the anesthesia: They take a needle and make a circle all around the base of the penis. That hurt. And then there is a tiny pinprick right around the head of the penis, but after that, the surgery is painless. It is an outpatient procedure: I was in and out of there in less than two hours. The first night was very painful, but 800 milligrams of ibuprofen got me through it, and after that I didn’t take anything. It was just sore.

Obviously the No. 1 question is, what’s sex like? One thing that’s different is that I always used to beg out of oral sex. Even from women who were very good at it. It was too much sensation, too intense. After the circumcision, oral sex became a whole lot easier; the pain was gone but the pleasure remained. Plus there are other little things that I used to take for granted. I’d been sexually active for twenty years—from when I was 17 until I was circumcised at 37—which is a long time to acclimate yourself: This is how I do it, this is how my body works. I hadn’t realized how many compromises I’d made, just little shifts of flesh, to feel comfortable. The things that I can do now are totally different. When I’m with my wife, I don’t have to have that moment of, Uh oh, is this going to hurt? That is an enormous relief. There haven’t been any complications either. You hear stories about men who turn into premature ejaculators or have difficulty ejaculating. Neither of those things turned out to be true. My wife says she doesn’t notice any difference.

If I were to have a son, I don’t see why I wouldn’t have him circumcised, given the potential benefits, in terms of cleanliness and what we’re finding about HIV and STDs. As I see it, there really are very few negatives. After my procedure I did feel a twinge of loss when I thought about my father—that I was different from him now. He died in 2006, but he knew about the surgery, and was a little perplexed by it. He gave me that look of Why on Earth would you want to do that? But my dad was a good liberal dad—do what you want to do. For me, circumcision made sense on every level: medically, sexually, and emotionally. I have never regretted it for a single day.

MONSHANE.CHOU@GMAIL.COM

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#17321408)

looks like he gave Lena Chen a taste test...he's suddenly HUMPING her twitter, facebook and blogs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#17346352)

hugoschwyzer [Moderator] 3 hours ago

My students are so proud here at Pasadena, and can't stop talking about your visit. It's gonna be awesome. Thank you, thank you!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#17405217)

"for me it was all about Black & Blue this year: Black Swan and Blue Valentine."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#17444055)

Lena Chen

I'm in San Francisco for an event on April 1st. Making a week-long California trip (LA/SF) out of it. Any cool events happening March 25-31st? Email me if you want me to visit your campus/hang out

Lorna Trinh likes this.

Hugo Schwyzer If you want to speak to my women's studies class, that'd be awesome. You can suck my cut cock afterward ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#17523699)

Charles Chumrau

Brother

Joshua Osgood

Joshua Osgood

Brother

Devereau Chumrau

Devereau Chumrau

Sister

Diana Schwyzer Maneta

Diana Schwyzer Maneta

Sister

Marco Maneta

Marco Maneta

Brother

Elizabeth Schwyzer

Elizabeth Schwyzer

Sister

Lauren Duckworth

Lauren Duckworth

Daughter

Heloise Cerys Raquel Schwyzer

Heloise Cerys Raquel Schwyzer

Daughter

2 years

Dudley Moshe Schwyzer

Dudley Moshe Schwyzer

Son

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#18652066)

http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/older-guys-lust-young-women/

In my office, Amber is telling me a familiar story. She’s come to talk about her autobiography paper for my women’s studies class, and she reads part of her rough draft aloud.

“I was 12, and this car pulled up alongside me as I was walking home from school … the driver looked a little older than my dad, at least 40. He leaned out, and I thought he was going to ask me for directions, but instead he asked me how old I was. When I told him, he laughed. ‘Damn, you got some big titties for such a little girl.’ He made this gross smacking sound with his lips, and sped away. I ran all the way home.”

Amber looks up at me. “I want to know,” she asks, “why do older men hit on younger women?” She’s 20 now, tall and graceful; she tells me that for the last eight years, older men have been approaching her. “It’s not just me,” she adds, “it happens to most of my friends, almost regardless of what they look like or what they’re wearing. It makes me feel like I can’t trust anyone, like all men want just one thing. Why can’t they chase women their own age?”

♦◊♦

I’ve been writing and researching about relationships between older men and younger women since 2005. While the media is hyping the “cougar” phenomenon, they ignore the reality that in most age-disparate affairs the man is the older (sometimes, as in the case of Hugh Hefner, astoundingly older) partner. We take it for granted that many men in their 30s, 40s, and 50s will be more sexually attracted to younger women than to their peers. While most men and women alike are appalled by stories of adult men hitting on 12-year-olds, we still assume that men will “naturally” lust after young women just a few years older.

In 2005, John Derbyshire, a much-admired right-wing pundit at the National Review, opined:

It is, in fact, a sad truth about human life that beyond our salad days, very few of us are interesting to look at in the buff. Added to that sadness is the very unfair truth that a woman’s salad days are shorter than a man’s—really, in this precise context, only from about 15 to 20.

Remarkably, the “family values” editors at America’s flagship conservative journal let this nonsense run, perhaps because they accepted what he was saying as gospel truth: 15- and 16-year-old girls are more sexually alluring to normal adult men than are women in their late 20s. But Derbyshire wasn’t telling us a truth about women’s beauty—he was telling us a truth about the way we’ve socialized male desire.

Ask any porn site operator: the “barely legal” or “teens” sections are among the most popular niches. That doesn’t sound so troubling when you imagine an army of teen boys masturbating to images and videos of their female peers. It’s considerably different to imagine men jerking off to pictures of girls young enough to be their daughters—or granddaughters. Since Hef published his first Playboy magazine in 1953, we’ve raised three generations of men to believe that women peak in desirability somewhere between 18 and 24. For many men, that peak starts much earlier. Ask a 17-year-old how often she’s been leered at (or worse) by a much older man.

For too many men, the term “jailbait” isn’t a warning. It’s an enticement.

♦◊♦

Spare me the arguments from biology or evolutionary psychology, the ones that excuse predatory old guys from staring at “young firm flesh” because that flesh belongs to a woman near the peak of her fertility. The great lengths to which countless men go to avoid fatherhood suggests that the continued evolutionary imperative to “spread one’s seed” is oversold to the point of being illusory. No one thinks babies were the first thing on the mind of Jason Statham when he started dating a 23-year-old Victoria’s Secret model, or that Sean Penn (50) is motivated by the desire to start a family with Scarlett Johansson, who’s barely half his age. This is about the cultural cachet of dating a much younger woman—and about the difficult-to-deny reality that younger women lack the experience and wisdom to call their older lovers on their bullshit.

Two recent books do a superb job of puncturing the argument that male sexuality is primarily a creature of evolutionary programming. University of North Carolina professor Martha McGaughey’s The Caveman Mystique: Pop-Darwinism and the Debates Over Sex, Violence and Science (Routledge, 2008) makes the convincing case that our beliefs about male sexuality form the science, and not the other way around. In other words, men who want a reason to chase younger women are desperate to claim that what is a culturally constructed choice is really an unavoidable biological reality.

Cordelia Fine’s Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference (Norton, 2010) offers a systematic debunking of the idea that men’s sexual decisions are driven largely by brain chemistry. Both Fine and McGaughey make a compelling case that the actual science doesn’t support the idea that men’s sexual desires are driven by evolutionary imperatives.

In other words, John Derbyshire (and a lot of other grown men) may be sexually attracted to underage girls—but they don’t get to blame that fetish on biology.

Even if it were “natural,” there’s nothing innocent or harmless or healthy about older men pursuing substantially younger women. The cost is high to everyone involved. While a few young women may be attracted to much older guys (often because they falsely imagine themselves to be “so much more mature” than “other girls” their age), most are like Amber—disheartened and disgusted by the endless parade of men 10, 20, or 40 years older who harass and hit on them. These young women aren’t flattered. And even if they seem flattered at the time, it doesn’t mean the attention from older men isn’t doing great harm.

♦◊♦

Lynn Phillips, a psychology professor at New York University, did a famous study of young women (mostly under legal age) who were in relationships with significantly older men. Most of the girls she interviewed described these affairs as mutual, exciting, and fulfilling. They pushed back against the suggestion that they were being exploited, claiming in many cases to have initiated or at least welcomed the sex with older men. Phillips then interviewed a similar number of older women. Each of these was over 30, and each had been in a relationship with a much older man while still in her teens. With the benefit of hindsight and experience, these older women acknowledged that they’d been used and hurt and exploited. They admitted that their claims of maturity and sexual adventurousness were all a pretense. In other words, what Phillips found is that while there are some teen girls who are “asking for it,” it’s not what they really want. Teen girls feign sexual sophistication; men need to be able to see through that.

Kerry Cohen, author of Loose Girl and the forthcoming Dirty Little Secrets: Breaking the Silence on Teenage Girls and Promiscuity, argues that “when adult men sexualize teen girls, even just by ogling them, the girls are reminded that their worth in their world is dependent on how sexy they are.” “Girls who choose men so far out of their age ranges,” Cohen writes, “tend toward low self-esteem and depression.” These aren’t sweet coming-of-age stories. And they don’t fit the pornographic story line that young girls are eager for sexual initiation at the hands of an older, wiser mentor.

Here’s the brutal truth, guys. Teen and 20-something women aren’t nearly as interested in much older men as you may think. Sure, there are high school girls with Johnny Depp fantasies, but guess what? You’re not Johnny Depp. (If you were that 48-year-old actor, you’d be devoted to your 38-year-old French girlfriend.) Yes, some young women do flirt with older men. Some do it for validation, some do it for excitement, but a hell of a lot of them do it because guys like you have already taught them that’s the only thing that older men want.

♦◊♦

A true story about the way younger women really see “older men” (and if you’re attracted to 18- to 24-year-olds, you count as “older” if you’re on the high side of 30).

A few years ago, my friend Sean went through a rough divorce. Newly single and almost 40, he went back on the dating scene for the first time in over a decade. But the woman who caught his eye wasn’t someone he met online. She was his favorite barista at his local Starbucks. She was 19.

Every afternoon for weeks, Sean would order his latté and chat up the gal behind the counter. He was slowly working up his courage to ask for her number—until she made the first move one day when he was the only customer in line.

“Uh, can I ask you something?” Her embarrassed grin seemed full of promise.

“Sure,” Sean said, his heart starting to race.

“Are you single?”

Wow, Sean thought to himself, this is easier than I thought. “Sure am!”

“Well, I know this is weird,” the barista said, “but you seem really great and I really want to introduce you to my mother. She’s really awesome, and I think you two would have a lot in common.”

Sean was crestfallen. He took the mother’s number, but never called. And he never went back to that Starbucks. “How can I date a woman my age when I’m already so attracted to her daughter?”

Too many of us are like Sean, flattering ourselves that we’re still desirable to women young enough to be our

daughters. Young women may want something from us that doesn’t involve dating their single mothers, but it’s usually not what we imagine that they want. Even if they seem flirtatious, remember how much of that is just a pretense. No matter how sexually forward they may seem, teen girls usually don’t want what they claim to want, at least not from a guy your age—and if you give it to them, chances are good they’ll resent you for it later.

♦◊♦

So many kids grow up like Amber, my student. So many grow up disappointed in—and betrayed by—older men. Part of being a good man is matching your language to your life, matching your desires and your values. Teen girls, and teen boys, need to see the older men in their lives as trustworthy and reliable. Like it or not, in the eyes of a young woman, you’ll never be trustworthy if you’re hitting on girls her age. You’ll be a “creep” and a “perv.” And you’ll have earned those names.

This isn’t about shaming adult men for doing a double-take at a cute high school cheerleader. It’s about gently reminding all of us that what looks so grown up isn’t. It’s about remembering that our libidos should be growing along with the rest of us. Most of us who are over 30 don’t have the same haircut or listen to the same music that we did when we were teens. Unless we’re the unfortunate John Derbyshire, shouldn’t we be attracted to a completely different age group than we were when we were too young to drive?

If we’re not fathers, we can still be role models. As I see in my own work every day, young people are so hungry for that comforting, steady male energy that only guys who won’t see 30 (or 40, or 50) again can provide. This isn’t about infantilizing young adults. It’s about building a culture where good, kind, and responsible men serve as guides and mentors to young people, boys and girls alike, who need our safety and our strength.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#18652052)

Sexual Predator is Leading SlutWalk LA – Hugo Schwyzer

Posted by Maoist Rebel News on 2011 06 02

Disclamer:

This has been re posted due to the fact that my opinion as stated here has come from other sources, including this person’s own website. He has made unsubstantiated threats that can be viewed on Twitter.

Rarely do i do this because its not the usual topic I cover but today i am going to do that. Few people know I am actually a feminist, but I’ve not expressed that as much as I should have because I’ve been avoiding YouTube drama (or as I call it YouTube pornography). This is wrong and I should not have been doing it. This will now change.

You may or may not have heard about the Slut Walk idiocy that has been going around. Okay some cops were handing out guides to being safe at night on this Canadian university campus and told this woman not to dress like a slut. She got mad and organized a “Slut Walk” to take back the word slut. Which makes sense because it was such a compliment before men took it and began using it as an insult. So I’m going to go ahead and “reclaim” the term “commie pig”.

There’s all kinds of reasons why this is stupid. But suffice to say that rape doesn’t happen because of female behaviour, but because of male behaviour.

Now this Slut Walk idiocy has spilled out form Canada into the United States (yes we got you with this like we did with Justin Bieber). Its begun in LA where it is being organized by Hugo Schwyzer. Who is he? Well he’s admitted to using his female students for sex. Basically he’s a sexual predator who’s leading naive women in a charge to be proud of being sluts. So basically for him, this whole thing is like one big interview for potential victims.

He abuses his position in a power structure to get sex. What a fucking pathetic little man. He goes after them because a grown woman with life experience can see through his lies to his pervy ways. The guy is basically a sexual predator in charge barely legal teens.

He goes after them because he can’t handle a real woman. He’s a horrible little man. To hell with you Hugo Schwyzer!

Source for his own admission of conduct with students

http://hugoschwyzer.net/2011/04/09/stop-before-you-become-the-dirty-old-man-a-remembered-morsel-of-advice/

COMMENTS:

Rock on! Glad to see a fellow feminist shout it loud and proud.

This guy is a creep, it’s painful to see young women left to wolves like him.

I’m a yoostabee feminist but that was destroyed in a horrible custody battle. I am a father of two daughters, and my conclusion re: Hugo is identical to yours.

Over and over as you read his antics, he does horrible things to women and men, and then manages always to rationalize that by projecting his bizarre behavior as the normal behavior of all men, and by that, he is often defended by women as a feminist.

But in reality, he is a sociopath, and no one should defend him.

FINALLY!!!! After years of calling out hugo “I’m only interested in sex” schwyzer out on his stupidity and getting boo hooed, there are finally people who are realizing what a complete liar, weirdo, sexual predator of students, this buffoon really is.

He hides behind his so called “championing of feminism and women’s rights” in order to bed students. This guy was bedding female students when I was attending PCC back in the mid 90′s. It was known by students and professors. Professor’s talked about it.

This buffoon is also a racist. On his old blog “hugo boy” he racially profiled students by saying “asians and armenians are the predominant ethnic races that cheat in classes”. Total idiot.

here is a post from Hugo Schwyzer’s blog “hugoboy” dated 2006. This guy thinks he quite smart playing with words. as an English Teacher all I can say is “nice try Hugo”. No matter how hard he tries to mask his agenda, it jumps out at you. He is saying “women, it’s ok to give in to your desire for pleasure, it’s ok to seek pleasure” and he invokes God ( I mean that’s low even by my standards) when he says “proclaim the God given right to delight in our bodies”. Wow! really Hugo? really? you hide behind God to justify your bedding students, cheating on your wife and using the feminism as a front for your sexual agenda? (women tend to fall for guys like this because hey “they understand women, they understand how they have been dumped on and how fragile, yet intelligent and unrewarded they are”. A complete joke.

Hugo Schwyzer wrote: “Though not all of my students are yet sexually active, all of them are “food active.” They’ve been eating for as long as they can remember, and will do so for the rest of their lives. Part of beginning a feminist journey is making a commitment not merely to self-indulgence, but to the principle that all human beings are entitled to seek out pleasure. It’s one thing to say those words aloud, another to live them out. And since feminism is never merely about transforming the self for the self alone, it’s vital that men and women commit themselves to being advocates for shame-free pleasure in the lives of their friends and family. Though our understanding of when and how we seek pleasure may be informed by our own spiritual beliefs, and though we ought never seek pleasure at the expense of another’s happiness, we can still boldly, loudly, and continually proclaim the God-given right to delight in our bodies.

Actor Dirk Benedict had it right when he said “Women are from Venus. Men are from Mars. Hamlet does not scan as Hamletta. Nor does Han Solo as Han Sally. Faceman is not the same as Facewoman. Nor does a Stardoe a Starbuck make. Men hand out cigars.Women `hand out’ babies. And thus the world, for thousands of years,has gone round.

At least he’s honest and not using a teaching position as a front for a sex stable.

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1785056&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1553245&forum_id=2#19183070)