The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
new HBS paper SHREDS keynesian theory, libs mad
| Odious Impertinent Mexican Hell | 02/29/12 |
| curious insane hall multi-billionaire | 02/29/12 |
| orange demanding brunch | 02/29/12 |
| Stimulating puppy wagecucks | 02/29/12 |
| crawly charismatic partner | 02/29/12 |
| Dark histrionic antidepressant drug french chef | 02/29/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 29th, 2012 1:33 PM Author: Odious Impertinent Mexican Hell http://www.people.hbs.edu/cmalloy/pdffiles/envaloy.pdf
"Our key innovation is to use changes in congressional committee chairmanship as a source of exogenous variation in state-level federal expenditures. In doing so, we show that fiscal spending shocks appear to significantly dampen corporate sector investment and employment activity. This retrenchment follows both Senate and House committee chair changes, occurs in large and small firms and within large and small states, and is most pronounced among geographically-concentrated firms." |
 |
Date: February 29th, 2012 1:36 PM Author: curious insane hall multi-billionaire Libs frantically doing the sign of cross while holding TGTOEIM, crying tears of MAF. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1886680&forum_id=2#20083554) |
Date: February 29th, 2012 1:36 PM Author: orange demanding brunch We show that becoming a powerful committee chair results in a significant increase in federal funds flowing to the ascending chairman’s state.2 Thus, a congressman’s ascension to a powerful committee chair creates a positive shock to his or her state’s share of federal funds that is virtually independent of the state’s economic conditions.
NO FUCKIN WAY--WHAT A SCHOLAR |
|
Date: February 29th, 2012 2:56 PM Author: Stimulating puppy wagecucks Do you realize that this phenomenon is the independent variable, not the dependent variable? There's really no reason to be MAF because someone's study is built on an obvious independent variable - that's a positive feature, because it means we can focus on whether it causes the outcome it correlates with (changes in economic growth) rather than whether it's happening. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1886680&forum_id=2#20084048) |
|
Date: February 29th, 2012 1:40 PM Author: crawly charismatic partner wtf is it with economists and just producing a wall of text with no figures? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1886680&forum_id=2#20083580) |
|
Date: February 29th, 2012 1:43 PM Author: Dark histrionic antidepressant drug french chef Yes breh, 90% of economists are MAF
http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/02/news-flash-economists-agree.html
|