The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
ITT: Simple arguments that easily fool idiots.
| apoplectic zippy multi-billionaire | 05/01/12 |
| Submissive crystalline point | 05/01/12 |
| Cowardly Site | 05/01/12 |
| Contagious piazza candlestick maker | 05/01/12 |
| scarlet ratface incel | 05/01/12 |
| Bistre Theater | 05/01/12 |
| Contagious piazza candlestick maker | 05/01/12 |
| Cerise Whorehouse | 05/01/12 |
| mind-boggling death wish nowag | 05/01/12 |
| comical flesh lay | 05/01/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:06 PM Author: apoplectic zippy multi-billionaire You're taking that "out of context."
I can't think of any nearly-universal argument that is more effective on an audience of idiots (that is, approximately average intelligence people and below). |
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:07 PM Author: Submissive crystalline point Country has aluminum tubes: need to occupy for a decade (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589470) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:39 PM Author: Cowardly Site Anything that begins with:
"The Founders never intended..."
Re: any statistics "The numbers don't lie"
Any argument from faith or religion |
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:40 PM Author: Contagious piazza candlestick maker In a provocative but ultimately vexing essay, Frederick Schauer sets out “to pierce some of the linguistic confusion that surrounds the many uses of the word ‘positivism.’ ” In so doing, he hopes to clarify exactly what positivism does and does not entail with respect to contemporary debates in American constitutional law. Schauer does not conceal the fact that there is a prescriptive dimension to his ostensibly explanatory effort. Clearly, he decries the degree to which positivism has fallen into disrepute among contemporary American legal theorists. In fact, he wants nothing less than to resurrect legal positivism and redeem it in the eyes of progressive legal scholars.
|
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:40 PM Author: scarlet ratface incel "Author: bloodacre" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589731) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:41 PM Author: Bistre Theater "Yes, but that's due to historical oppression" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589733) |
 |
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:42 PM Author: Contagious piazza candlestick maker lulz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589740) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:43 PM Author: Cerise Whorehouse ITT: an idiot calls other people idiots while using an idiotic notion of what an argument is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589747) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:44 PM Author: mind-boggling death wish nowag "that's ignorant" for anything unpc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589751) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2012 2:45 PM Author: comical flesh lay For the bible tells me so... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1937673&forum_id=2#20589753) |