The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Feminism has been the most disastrous ideology in human history.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:38 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life (Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife) Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith, And the Gods of the Copybook Heading said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.” |
 |
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:22 AM Author: sinister ocher idea he suggested school (Glennbecktard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594938) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:29 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend That's Kipling, idiot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594983) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:30 AM Author: sinister ocher idea he suggested school i know, idiot. it's only making the rounds now because glenn beck put it in his book. it's objectively SPS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594993) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:36 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend I don't really care what Glenn Beck did or didn't put in his book. The poem is fine one, and most educated people were taught to memorize it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595015) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:46 PM Author: boyish wild selfie state Hubbard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20598051) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:57 PM Author: comical black sandwich stock car 180 brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20598160) |
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:42 AM Author: Racy hospital feminism has worked out fine for me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594716) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:45 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend You are not human history, htfh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594729) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:46 AM Author: Racy hospital i'm the entirety of human history that i care about (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594735) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:46 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend And that's why feminism has been a disaster. Thanks for playing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594739) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:48 AM Author: Racy hospital the fuck does that have to do with feminism (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594746) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:49 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Feminism is the ideology of solipsism. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594756) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:51 AM Author: Racy hospital that is not a true statement (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594765) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:19 AM Author: drab marvelous church building ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595428) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:27 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Solipsism: n. 1. the theory that only the self exists, or can be proved to exist. 2. extreme preoccupation with and indulgence of one's feelings, desires, etc.; egoistic self-absorption. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595457) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 5:00 AM Author: drab marvelous church building well sure, but i don't understand the logic of your argument. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595525) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:43 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night it hasn't hurt me any, if it's brutal on men, one could argue it's social darwinism, weeding out the betas, but it hasn't really done this at all so relax (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594718) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:46 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Except that "weeding out the betas" gives you fucking Africa, htfh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594731) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:43 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre modern capitalism required women in the workforce to maximize the consumer pool and fulfill labor needs. now that fewer workers are necessary, that model is outmoded, but since it was paired up with "rights" and other noneconomic concepts, it's not very reversible at this point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594721) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:45 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night an economy that requires fewer workers doesn't mean that it isn't more efficient to have a large (over 50%) portion of the population participate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594727) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:46 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend But it isn't, because men and women are different. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594736) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:48 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night yep they're different, i'm willing to bet there are many jobs out there that women will simply do better to say nothing of the fact that i'm willing to bet a top 10% female lawyer for instance is far better than a median male lawyer, or programmer, or executive, etc. higher workforce participation leads to efficiency, what don't you understand about this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594752) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:50 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Most women are mediocre. Men move to the extremes. A few women are better in the labor force and should be allowed to work. Most would be better off watching their babies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594759) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:52 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night are you saying there are a lot more males that are brilliant and a lot more males that are also retards? if that's what you're saying then you'd want more female workers really... most jobs don't necessarily require someone brilliant, just someone who's not retarded. pharmacist comes to mind, any sort of mid level manager, accountants, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594767) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:54 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend If you want a managerial economy, you're correct. But managers don't produce; they just manage. If you want a productive economy, you need planners at the top and grunts at the bottom. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594774) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:57 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night but you still need people in between, professionals like dentists still exist in your society i'm guessing? along with accountants, pharmacists, paralegals, etc. there's a whole level of society where it makes sense to have mediocre female workers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594791) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:01 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Most dentists and accountants are men. The women in these fields tend to work part-time and would have been better off training as assistants (their education is expensive, but the work they put in isn't).
I think paralegal is a nice way to make some money before getting married. It's stupid to have this as a career. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:05 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night "Most dentists and accountants are men."
the disparity is falling dramatically, i'm guessing accountants it's pretty close to 50/50 if you look at 30 somethings and younger, and for dentists, google it it used to be like 15/85, it's 35/65, and i'm guessing with the competition increase the level of service in these fields has increased. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:08 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Most of those women, as I already said, work part-time and would have been better off as assistants. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594846) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:10 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night most dentists work part time regardless, average dentist works like 30 hrs a week right?
link to female accountants working part time? |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:11 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend No, most dentists work full-time. Something like 20% of men work part-time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594863) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:12 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night hmmm maybe the dentist thing is just xo flame, that's where i heard the 30 hr thing from
in any case most female working professionals are not part time workers. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:15 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Most female working professionals aren't that necessary. Sorry if I'm not exactly celebrating more HR nanny jobs while we bleed manufacturing jobs to the Chinese and Indians. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594888) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:21 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night HR isn't the only profession women are in, don't you have female co-workers? Keep in mind law is still relatively dominated by males, but most jobs that don't require professional degrees have some level of parity. But even if they didn't having that 20-30% of females in useful jobs like the ones listed above isn't a bad thing it's a good thing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594926) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:22 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann women in law has hurt the law profession and made women worse. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594939) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:24 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend There are a lot of reasons the profession has declined, but jfc women in law haven't improved the field at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594956) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:22 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann this is absolutely true. 90% of jobs done by women (and maybe 50% done by men) have no use to society. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594933) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:22 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night (guy who makes up numbers) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594941) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:23 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann dood, you're really getting pwned in this thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594950) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:47 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night tell me more fake statistics plz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595071) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:08 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann have you ever worked for a govt office? do we really need this many marketing/pharma sales/advertising bitches? would they be better off having the type of intelligent attractive kids who are going extinct? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595394) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:47 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre well, you've got to determine what the costs of having women in the workplace actually are, economically or otherwise, relative to the benefits. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594741) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:50 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night if it's more efficient to have one person in the family stay with the kids rather than work, they'd do it, in fact it could be substantially less efficient because the value created from having a stay at home mom or dad is untaxed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594760) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:51 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Lol at this aspie applying the efficient market hypothesis to childrearing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594766) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:53 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night it's just common sense dude
if you have a wife that say makes... 3,000 a month, in all likelihood she's gonna turn into a stay at home mom because her income just doesn't justify staying in the workforce, i mean day care alone is gonna eat up 1,000 bucks.
if your wife works biglaw tho, well it makes more sense if she continues working, depending on how much value you put on a mother being at home with their kid |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:55 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Exactly, it all depends on that last tricky clause ("how much value you put on a mother being at home with their kid."). Feminism skews those evaluations. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594780) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:59 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night i think traditionalists tend to overvalue having a mother at home at all but the first few years of life, my mom had to work (altho she wanted to stay at home with us we were just too fucking poor and my dad's janitorial job wasn't cutting it)
honestly tho after age five, you're in school from like 8 to 3 PM anyway, and even if the mom of the house works she's only gonna miss seeing the kid for two hours or so |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:04 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Housework and leisure.
You would be a much better person if your parents hadn't been prole trash. My mother worked her stupid SWPL job, which meant she came home tired and inattentive, picked fights with my dad, made life generally miserable for all of us. Unsurprisingly, they divorced.
My cousins were raised by a stay-at-home mom who focused on keeping fit, cleaning the house, and cooking good food. Unsurprisingly, she's still married and her family is happy. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:07 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night hmmm this explains a bit about you i suppose, my mom cooked dinner, we the kids cleaned the house (i'm glad we did it helped us not be entitled lazy fucks), my mom never caught the fat.
My parents hardly argued, and unsurprisingly she's still married and as a family we are happy |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:08 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Yes, but it isn't that hard to clean a trailer. Middle-class people need leisure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594850) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:14 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night "Middle-class people need leisure."
are u saying middle class women need leisure? i'm guessing if a wife doesn't work that puts more pressure on the dude to make more money, so i'm guessing you aren't middle class adult men need leisure. Do you mean middle class kids need leisure? It isn't hard to do a few household chores, not sure that justifies requiring a women to stay at home. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:17 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Yes, I think men and women are on average different. I don't object to children doing chores (I did them too), but most homes require more than a few household chores to keep clean. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594900) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:22 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night like what? you seem to forget i live in a house, there's not that much shit to do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594934) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:24 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend How big is your house? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594961) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:45 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night 4 bed, 3 bath (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595052) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:48 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend How many stories? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595076) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:55 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night two (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595111) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:10 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Do your parents live upstairs or downstairs? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595185) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:53 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre women by nature are hypergamous. they prefer men who make more than them. to the extent that we've tried to impose a "female breadwinner" model on society, we seem to have just ended up with a falling birthrate, falling rates of marriage, and more single moms. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594771) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:55 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night who has tried to impose a female breadwinner society? whoever does is a fucking retard. in any case this doesn't mean women should not work (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594779) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:56 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend The female breadwinner society is the natural result of female hypergamy and the collapse of marriage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594786) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:00 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night did you take some sort of male pride seminar recently? it certainly sounds that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594802) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:05 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Nope, just telling the truth, brother. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594827) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:56 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre it's underway in america right now. the results so far aren't promising. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594788) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:05 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594830) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:08 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night this is a lot like having an argument with a religious fanatic you make a claim and back it up with absolutely nothing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594847) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:09 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend What would you accept as evidence? Because this usually just gets into a long left-wing denial march anyway. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594856) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:11 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night i dunno, but something more than "dude it's totally happening and it aint looking good" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594861) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:13 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend http://www.samueljscott.com/2010/05/15/single-mothers-statistics-single-motherhood/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594870) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:19 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night this article basically just makes circular arguments, couldn't a reasonable alternative hypothesis be that there's more single mothers in the lower income groups of society and that the lower income group has grown in size while the middle class has shrank.
Now before you go and blame feminism for the fall of the middle class which will actually make you look really retarded. The fall of the middle class has more to do with the fall of manufacturing and other high paying jobs that don't require education. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:21 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend You're still left with explaining why more single mothers would be in the lower income groups.
Those jobs have fallen because we've transitioned to a feminized economy, hth. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:23 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night are you fucking kidding me? you blame the fall of the middle class on women joining the workforce? fucking LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594949) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:26 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Sure. We would have pursued sensible policies to protect our manufacturing competitiveness otherwise. The Germans took the other path.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/world/europe/29iht-FFgermany29.html?pagewanted=all |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:44 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night "Sure. We would have pursued sensible policies to protect our manufacturing competitiveness otherwise."
so if it weren't for feminism we would have never have gotten into NAFTA or opened our borders to german/japanese products? aside from this it wasn't because of our general incompetence in manufacturing? Ok, gotcha. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:49 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend These were the symptoms, not the disease. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595086) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:56 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night ok so explain how feminism led to the decline in manufacturing in our country (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595115) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:15 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre charles murray addressed some similar themes in "Coming Apart," even though his prescriptions were kind of ridiculous.
but for the US, we have a staggering rate of divorce, a high rate of single motherhood and unstable families, a birth rate that is both falling below replacement level AND where the remaining fertility is tilted toward the lower classes, and middle class wage stagnation since the 1970's.
these are serious problems. not all of them would be addressed or could be changed much via the percentage of women in the workplace, but it's clear that certain societal goals are probably contradictory in nature (eg, encourage both strong stable families and universal female labor force participation). |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:47 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night i'm not advocating universal female labor force participation, also read below, you don't need a stay at home mom for a strong stable family (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595067) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:34 PM Author: Bearded Doctorate Site Look all around you, dipshit. The children are stupider and more poorly behaved than ever. The adults have the most fucked up priorities you can imagine. Society is rotten to the core and yes, the common theme between a lot of these problems is feminism and its consequences. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20597955) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:45 AM Author: balding cocky prole main people fucked in the ass by capitalism again (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594728) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:50 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration you seem utterly dumb. "modern capitalism" survived just fine without women. capitalism freed up women from working in the home so they had more time to find careers. again, you seem economically and utterly dumb.
pwn |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:54 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre you're thinking of premodern (pre-WWII) western capitalism, not modern western capitalism from the postwar up through the 90's.
but now we're sliding into some kind of postmodern phase, and shit don't seem quite as hopeful. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:56 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration you seem economically stunted. productivity allowed more free time in the home. for instance, washing machines, microwaves, refrigerators, and nearby supermarkets drastically reduced time working in the home. you seem like an utter dumb. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594785) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:59 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre i'm not even sure what contention this is meant to refute. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594798) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:00 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration "'modern capitalism' survived just fine without women. capitalism freed up women from working in the home so they had more time to find careers."
your reading comprehension and your ability to follow along with the conversation seem lacking. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:03 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre modern western consumer capitalism was by its nature expansionist, obviously, and there was a huge push during the postwar era to turn "the forgotten 50%" into consumers.
this wasn't something that came naturally in the US - there was social and religious opposition in some quarters, for instance - but the demands of the economic system were very clear, and all noneconomic considerations were basically shoved aside by the lords of marketing and the captains of capital of that era.
they wanted more consumers and more workers, tradition be damned. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:06 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration oh, because wealth is zero-sum, according to you, right? when two parties trade (e.g. the worker trades his time for cash), one party wins and the other loses, correct? funny. since the dawn of capitalism, productivity has skyrocketed, leading to much larger gains in standard of living, doubling life expectancy, increasing leisure, and made our very poor fat because of the low prices in food. you seem like a dumb.
pwn |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:08 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre let me guess - your definition of "wealth" is going to be phrased entirely in economic terms. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594849) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:10 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration "Wealth is the abundance of valuable resources or material possessions."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth
PWN. now stfu |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:18 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre now, define "resources."
see, the thing is, you are glossing over much of the fundamental debate here. there are serious questions about the effects that the pressures of modern western consumer capitalism are placing upon families, and the effects on familial stability that result. that's a question that crosses economics and sociology. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:01 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night he's saying you don't really need a stay at home mom because modern conveniences have largely made them obsolete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594809) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:03 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594818) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:06 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre that statement only makes sense if you view the world only through a narrow economic lens in which "obsolescence" has no non-economic components to it.
i'm not even arguing for women to get out of the workplace. but it's worthwhile to think about how they got there to begin with, and what the effects have been. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:09 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night and what do you think has been the effect, please make a clear causal relationship when you do, or at the very least an argument for one
btw the value of a stay at home mom is supposed to be interaction with their kids, once the kids start school this largely disappears as any sort of value |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:21 AM Author: Concupiscible Nighttime Theatre the effect of modern feminism in general? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594932) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:56 AM Author: Blue startling property tattoo (george20) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595376) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:55 AM Author: Floppy know-it-all menage idiot Lol george20/neocon mad as fukkk when his precious free market screws his beta ass (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594778) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:58 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration you seem dumb. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594793) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:49 AM Author: jet hissy fit turdskin Feminism, gay rights, civil rights, etc, are all just Marxist franchises, basically. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594754) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:51 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend At least Marxists pretended to care about the poor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594764) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:53 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration yes, because capitalism didn't give the poor high-speed internet, hdtv, xboxes, indoor plumbing, air conditioning, iphones, nikes, refrigerators, and access to free healthcare through privately-owned emergency rooms. you seem like an utter dumb. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594772) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:57 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Capitalism does a lot of good things and a lot of bad things. How is this hard for you to process? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594792) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 1:58 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration what bad things, retard? list them. cite stats and figures. i will pwn you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594797) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:07 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend lol, for one thing it produces boring people who think life is only stats and figures. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594843) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:11 AM Author: Opaque institution internal respiration you're a dumb. we get it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594862) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:19 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend Go do your reading, troll.
http://hollis.harvard.edu/?itemid=|library/m/aleph|000550426 |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:15 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann 1960: smart women popped out four kids starting at 24
2012: smart women get "educated" and slut around, maybe popping out one kid at 35
1960: man with a job guaranteed slender faithful 22 year old wife
2012: fill in the blank |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:22 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend This is a simplistic view of 1960, but the outlines are correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20594940) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:41 AM Author: useless mint feces To be fair,
1960: Betas can potentially pull hot tail by getting it on lockdown early.
2012: Betas spend all night every night bitching about Alphas casually fucking all of the hot young single bitches with impunity. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:45 AM Author: vibrant degenerate queen of the night (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595057) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:10 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann how does that contradict what i said?
Even for alpha males, most of whom want to settle down eventually, the number of wife material bitches is almost zero past 25. So if you don't lock down a chick in sophomore year of college you're fucked. How is this good? |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:11 AM Author: sexy casino Alphas don't obsess over the number of sexual partners a chick has had the way betas do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595404) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:14 AM Author: Razzle Puce Dopamine Legend The smarts ones do.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html http://studiesoflove.com/marriage/premaritalsexdivorce.html |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:18 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann "alpha" and "beta" itself are feminist inspired terms designed to divide men. before feminism, men all understood there are girls for fun and girls for marriage, and they understood which was which. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595423) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:20 AM Author: sexy casino LOL beta. WTF does feminism have to do with betas being unable to get chicks? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595430) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:22 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann you're hopeless dood. Feminism is about the actions and motivations of women, not men. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595436) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:24 AM Author: sexy casino Yeah so it can't possibly make men into alphas and betas. Sorry you're a beta, beta. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595446) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:26 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann this discussion is about feminism. you understand that means the women's movement, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595452) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:27 AM Author: sexy casino I thought you were leaving.
WTF does feminism have to do with alphas and betas? |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:30 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann i'm not sure, that's why i don't think you're understanding the discussion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595464) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:40 AM Author: sexy casino Are you retarded?
"'alpha' and 'beta' itself are feminist inspired terms designed to divide men" |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:16 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann your girlfriend was a slut. I get it. that doesn't make you alpha, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595418) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:21 AM Author: sexy casino You're enraged at sluts because you resent that they're having sex with the asshole alphas and not you. It's a reasonable sentiment and I understand it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595433) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:23 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann i think i'm done with you. you seem to have an IQ of barely 100, and are almost definitely not anything approaching an "asshole alpha" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595441) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:25 AM Author: sexy casino I think I understand why you aren't competitive on the casual marketplace and wish a 22 year-old chick were forced to marry you or starve. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595450) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 11:25 AM Author: Plum Associate Marketing Idea "Alphas don't obsess over the number of sexual partners a chick has had the way betas do."
You realize that men have obsessed over this en masse since the beginning of time, right? The most beta men of all are the ones that convince themselves that they aren't "supposed" to care. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 11:30 AM Author: Sapphire narrow-minded space lol this guy has no idea what alpha and beta mean (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20596335) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:08 PM Author: Plum Associate Marketing Idea tcr. If you marry a used up slut then you're not actually alpha. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20598257) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 2:42 AM Author: sexy casino http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938295&mc=6&forum_id=2#20594969 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595041) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:14 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann Marlboro Red is a brainless turd. Illegitimacy and divorce way up in 50 years, median male wages decreasing for three decades, marriage rates decreasing, police state spending ARE tax dollars harassing dads for child support instead of women choosing dads who will stay with them.
that's a start. Now time for feminism's benefits. And if you start with "more women to fuck" it's not really accurate. Men could get laid plenty before feminism. Only difference the sluts who put out were much fewer, so when you wanted to settle down, there were cool chicks to do it with. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:17 AM Author: sexy casino No there weren't plenty of women to have sex with. Almost all women waited to have sex until marriage.
I'd rather be able to fuck around as much as I want now. Of course, betas can do this. Oh, and having sex before marriage doesn't mean a chick isn't cool. There are plenty of cool chicks to settle down with, again if you're not a beta. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:21 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann when you use the terms "alpha" and "beta" it really seems like you've just learned their definitions tonight or something.
Remember, most women got married at about 21 then, so it wasn't waiting that long. I, personally would rather have a society full of intact families and good mothers rather than the trash we have now, although my immediate interests are better off now in some ways. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:24 AM Author: sexy casino You're so butthurt about being a beta that you try to blame FEMINISTs for a fucking natural division that has existed since the beginning of mankind.
Your immediate interests aren't better because you're a beta so you don't benefit from casual sex anyway. I don't want to get married at 21 so I'd rather spend my youth sleeping with a variety of women.
Betas can't get casual sex so they wish they could settle down with a woman at 21. Why not? They're not missing out on anything anyway. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:29 AM Author: Bearded multi-colored sanctuary boltzmann I benefit from casual sex plenty. it gets old, and eventually you want to get married and raise a family.
and let's be real, most guys in a place like NYC can get casual sex. you don't have to be tall, rich, or hot. but it's a small minority fucking the hottest women. i'm gonna go out on a limb and say that's not you, buddy.
do you have a justification for feminism beyond what you claim are personal benefits to you? |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:42 AM Author: sexy casino You want it not to be me because you're not getting laid.
I don't give a shit about feminism. It benefits me sure. The guys who are so butthurt about feminism are those like you who can only offer women commitment and stability and are angry that this isn't enough to get them a young, decent woman despite it being enough for their grandfathers. |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 11:32 AM Author: Sapphire narrow-minded space (retard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20596348) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 8:26 PM Author: tan sickened milk It benefits you because you're a woman (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20599877) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:42 AM Author: Milky spectacular kitty cat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20595495) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:44 PM Author: spruce national ITT butthurt betas arguing about the erosion of entrenched male access to capital (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20598030) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 3:56 PM Author: comical black sandwich stock car cr. i opened this nodding my head to the title, but what a lulzy disaster of a thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20598148) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 4:04 PM Author: spruce national as if all that feminism did was equalize access to employment. in fact, that was probably more of a rider on AA policies and if it is considered primarily a feminist concern, they have failed pretty miserably. LOL at america's pathetic maternity leave (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20598223) |
|
Date: May 2nd, 2012 8:28 PM Author: tan sickened milk No alphas post on XO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1938274&forum_id=2#20599888) |