The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Thomas Clerks Bailing Out of Bluebook, Using 'Ibid.'
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:27 AM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess this morning:
This Court has also stated that “adjudication of the constitutionality of congressionalenactments has generally been thought beyond the jurisdiction of administrative agencies.” Thunder Basin, 510 U. S., at 215 (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted).
We need not, and do not, decide whether the MSPB’s view of its power is correct, or whether the oft-statedprinciple that agencies cannot declare a statute unconstitutional is truly a matter of jurisdiction. See ibid. (describing this rule as “not mandatory”). In Thunder Basin, we held that Congress’ intent to preclude district court jurisdiction was fairly discernible in the statutory scheme“[e]ven if ” the administrative body could not decide the constitutionality of a federal law. Ibid. That issue, we reasoned, could be “meaningfully addressed in the Court of Appeals” that Congress had authorized to conduct judicial review. Ibid. |
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:29 AM Author: razzle theater stage goal in life hope the pencil necked bluebook authors see this as the up-yours it obviously is (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866525) |
 |
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:31 AM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess I don't much care for the bluebook, but as a lawyer who's accustomed to seeing id., not ibid. in legal documents, I found this confusing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866532) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:58 AM Author: Vivacious dark round eye to be fair, the "pencil-necked bluebook authors" have more prestige in their pube hair than any Thomas clerk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866621) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:07 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess his clerks are hot though
http://www.law.duke.edu/images/news/4773.jpg
http://www.law.duke.edu/images/news/6942.jpg |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:08 PM Author: Vivacious dark round eye is this a huge surprise given what the public knows about Justice Thomas? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866666) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:10 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess tbf, both of these girls were hired by gorsuch, whom I don't believe to be a creep (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866677) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:10 PM Author: Razzmatazz Iridescent Kitty Cat Amazing. An ugly chick really has no hope. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866676) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:18 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess yeah... here's a thomas clerk who went to lsu (!! - though tbf, Bristow fellowship and Edith Jones clerk)
http://www1.law.lsu.edu/news/files/2012/02/Stratton-MichelleShamblin.jpg
here's a milf he hired well into her 30s (boggs)
http://www.winston.com/siteFiles/headshots/16235.gif
girl on the left (kavanaugh)
http://www.gwu.edu/~magazine/archive/2005_law_fall/images/feat_tyler2.jpg
decent woc, lolsy nyu magazine photoshop
http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/magazine/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2008notes_Thompsonportrait250.jpg |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:07 PM Author: Crystalline mischievous locale ladyboy unhhhh
conservaheroines.... |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:05 PM Author: Harsh blathering brunch milk yeah, some random CLS douchenozzle is more prestigious than a SCOTUS clerk, even Thomas...right... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883895) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:06 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883905) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:07 PM Author: Crystalline mischievous locale ladyboy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883914) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:07 PM Author: Crystalline mischievous locale ladyboy this may be among the most retarded things ever posted here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883916) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:10 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883947) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:19 PM Author: dun vibrant karate LOL, no. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20884028) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:17 PM Author: Beady-eyed Aqua Shitlib posner already dressed them down so much better (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866713) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: Marvelous yarmulke YNY (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866529) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:31 AM Author: salmon pozpig The Supreme Court has long used different rules than the Bluebook, including use of 'ibid.' Google and ye shall find. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866530) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:33 AM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess yeah, in ginsburg's opinion in wood v. milyard this term, she weirdly switches between id. when citing different page numbers, and ibid. when she's citing the same page as she did previously (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866536) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: salmon pozpig That's proper under their rules. I think it's more intuitive than the Bluebook rule, and I would be quite happy if the SCOTUS rules superseded all the Bluebook rules. Particularly, I don't like italicizing non-Latin signals like 'see.' (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866567) |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:11 PM Author: Razzmatazz Iridescent Kitty Cat I much prefer the NY rules over both. Jurisdictions that actually stick to Bluebook piss me off.
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/New_Styman.htm |
|
Date: June 11th, 2012 12:00 PM Author: Razzmatazz Iridescent Kitty Cat lol at anyone giving a shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20866625) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:08 PM Author: Crystalline mischievous locale ladyboy i'm 95% sure this stupid, inconsequential shit is handled by the career administrative bluebooking nerds that the supreme court hires and not by clerks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883923) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:11 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess I don't know. if that were the case, you'd see ibid's in every scotus opinion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883956) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:13 PM Author: Crystalline mischievous locale ladyboy i bet one of these dbags runs an office with monkeys that take care of this shit.
Officers:
Counselor to the Chief JusticeJEFFREY P. MINEAR ClerkWILLIAM K. SUTER LibrarianLINDA MASLOW MarshalPAMELA TALKIN Reporter of DecisionsCHRISTINE L. FALLON Court CounselSCOTT HARRIS CuratorCATHERINE E. FITTS Director of Information TechnologyROBERT J. HAWKINS Public Information OfficerKATHLEEN L. ARBERG
Organization Structure
Court Officers assist the Court in the performance of its functions. They include the Counselor to the Chief Justice, the Clerk, the Librarian, the Marshal, the Reporter of Decisions, the Court Counsel, the Curator, the Director of Information Technology, and the Public Information Officer. The Counselor is appointed by the Chief Justice. The Clerk, Reporter of Decisions, Librarian, and Marshal are appointed by the Court. All other Court Officers are appointed by the Chief Justice in consultation with the Court.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/about_us.aspx |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:14 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess I don't really see where any of these dudes would have that in their job description (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20883987) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:18 PM Author: Crystalline mischievous locale ladyboy ClerkWILLIAM K. SUTER
LibrarianLINDA MASLOW
MarshalPAMELA TALKIN
Reporter of DecisionsCHRISTINE L. FALLON
okay, maybe not marshal but one of the other ones. |
|
Date: June 13th, 2012 11:21 PM Author: Soul-stirring Jewess well all I can say is that at my coa, the clerk does not bluebook, at most they format opinions (and do a shit-ton of other stuff, mostly stuff involving the parties and their submissions to the court) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1968296&forum_id=2#20884044) |