The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
are there any principled lib justices?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 3rd, 2012 3:52 AM Author: curious hospital there are plenty examples of conservative justices crossing over to vote with the libs. which lib has done the same? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007553) |
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:13 AM Author: Kink-friendly windowlicker area Impossible, using most definitions of "lib"
They are all fucking douche hacks who go with their policy preferences. |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:16 AM Author: Histrionic stock car base O'Connor and she's gone.
:( :( |
 |
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:22 PM Author: curious hospital oconnor isn't a lib. she was nominated by a republican (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008447) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 9:13 PM Author: Histrionic stock car base (guy who hasn't read the ACA decision) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21011514) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:21 AM Author: at-the-ready idea he suggested Breyer often does on law enforcement cases. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007936) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:51 PM Author: curious hospital so does Soto, but I don't really consider those cases as natural political dividing lines. thats like pointing to free speech jurisprudence. is there really a coherent party position? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008586) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:25 AM Author: zombie-like tantric box office i'm a former breyer clerk, and i'll be the first to admit the liberal wing are unprincipled politcal hacks especially compared to the conservatives on the court. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007965) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:27 PM Author: Impressive outnumbered address boiling water no you're not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008469) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:30 AM Author: Supple shrine brethren I like how all of the professors commenting on ACA pretend that Roberts crossing the aisle is the thing that has really shown that the SCOTUS bench is not merely partisan. Yeah, okay. Four justices being predictably in the tank for the liberal vote on every single liberal/conservative divide every single time without exception: not politically partisan, so long as a conservative vote crosses over to them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007987) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:36 AM Author: Histrionic stock car base i'm a libtard and i endorse this message. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008004) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:39 AM Author: naked filthpig What about the fact that he was motivated to switch his vote on the issue by a White House lobbying campaign? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008012) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:44 AM Author: glassy aromatic theatre when you elect libtard presidents, you get libtard judges who don't follow "the law" but are rubber stamps for their agenda (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008033) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:46 AM Author: Abnormal twinkling uncleanness masturbator when you elect [insert opposing political ideology] presidents you get [insert opposing political ideology] judges who don't [insert preferred approach to jurisprudence] but [insert approach to jurisprudence you oppose]. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008040) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 11:32 AM Author: Kink-friendly windowlicker area Following the law is more than a preferred approach to jurisprudence.
Killself shitlib |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:24 PM Author: curious hospital I see all these NYT articles "why can't republicans get their judges to vote how they want?" hmm maybe cuz some of them aren't political hacks like every lib justice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008456) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:27 PM Author: Supple shrine brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008467) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:30 PM Author: Kink-friendly windowlicker area (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008487) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:39 PM Author: abusive abode In fairness, who are the principled conservative judges? Thomas? Thats about it. Scalia would be but every so often he jumps the shark and blows it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008521) |
|
Date: July 3rd, 2012 9:26 PM Author: pearl provocative church http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3prsrh/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21011587) |