"you didn't build that" gaffe basically over now
| irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | arousing ape | 07/21/12 | | jade soul-stirring office | 07/21/12 | | rose crackhouse jew | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | Rusted racy church | 07/21/12 | | Flickering Green Keepsake Machete | 07/21/12 | | Rusted racy church | 07/21/12 | | Flickering Green Keepsake Machete | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | irradiated boistinker | 07/21/12 | | Flickering Green Keepsake Machete | 07/21/12 | | vivacious macaca range | 07/21/12 | | Razzle chapel | 07/21/12 | | Very tactful national security agency | 07/21/12 | | Razzle chapel | 07/21/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:04 AM Author: irradiated boistinker
do you think in the darkest, deepest corner of his mind Obama has been glad for that?
Not like consciously, but on some level? he was getting gaped with blue collar voters on that issue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136340) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:15 AM Author: irradiated boistinker
yeah roads and infrastructure and guvt R&D is socialism
*sigh*
this is why i find voting republican so hard these days. most of my fellow GOPers are literally mouthbreaing fucking retards like you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136463) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:19 AM Author: irradiated boistinker
bro, it's a deficit.
if you think romney won't try to raise taxes your dreaming.
reagan and bush I were my type of conservatives. they put aside ideology when necessary and raised taxes because they were ACTUAL fiscal conservatives.
i think romney is going to be similar in that he understands you can't supply-side your way out of a deficit (contra what the mouthbreathers that constitute a big part of the GOP think these days)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136508) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:20 AM Author: irradiated boistinker
....are you retarded?
are you aware presidents have a veto power?
Bush I was awesome. i don't even know what you mean "out of touch." if you mean you wanted some down on the ranch type mouthbreather like Bush II, well, fuck you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136527) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:23 AM Author: Very tactful national security agency
bush I was an incumbent who easily won a war and yet got kicked out on his ass, in large part by disenchanting huge parts of his own base. he spent like a retard, appointed fucking faggots like souter, and signed shit bills like the ADA. he was a career politician, washington insider and out of touch faggot.
wtf does the veto power have to do with reagan? he had to negotiate with recalcitrant house dems on budget and tax policy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136544)
|
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:14 AM Author: irradiated boistinker
"There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me -- because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -- look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.
"If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business -- you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
"The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together. There are some things, just like fighting fires, we don’t do on our own. I mean, imagine if everybody had their own fire service. That would be a hard way to organize fighting fires.
"So we say to ourselves, ever since the founding of this country, you know what, there are some things we do better together. That’s how we funded the G.I. Bill. That’s how we created the middle class. That’s how we built the Golden Gate Bridge or the Hoover Dam. That’s how we invented the Internet. That’s how we sent a man to the moon. We rise or fall together as one nation and as one people, and that’s the reason I’m running for President -- because I still believe in that idea. You’re not on your own, we’re in this together."
BECAUSE OF OUR INDIVIDUAL INITIATIVE, but also because we do things together.
Sorry dude, this one's pretty blatantly taken out of context.
but that's politics. he made the mistake and deserves to get hammered on it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136453) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 1:16 AM Author: irradiated boistinker
Romney's been solidly bland so far, which is really his only hope.
i think obama will continue to get killed with middle class whites, the young won't turn out in droves like they did in '08, and MAYBE romney pulls this off.
PA is basically a lock for us now, IMO. that's huge (and not really talked about for some reason)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000345&forum_id=2#21136477) |
|
|