Padding hours at BIGLAW
| insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | Abusive athletic conference | 07/28/12 | | Translucent Charismatic Electric Furnace Fanboi | 07/28/12 | | Slate disturbing market trump supporter | 07/28/12 | | Olive Sanctuary | 07/28/12 | | Razzmatazz Buff Trailer Park | 07/03/20 | | godawful mental disorder | 07/28/12 | | pink medicated school cafeteria community account | 07/28/12 | | Slate disturbing market trump supporter | 07/28/12 | | godawful mental disorder | 07/28/12 | | insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | pink medicated school cafeteria community account | 07/28/12 | | godawful mental disorder | 07/28/12 | | vivacious tattoo | 01/28/13 | | Bateful casino ceo | 07/28/12 | | geriatric den | 07/28/12 | | spectacular blood rage bbw | 07/28/12 | | insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | Slate disturbing market trump supporter | 07/28/12 | | insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | Slate disturbing market trump supporter | 07/28/12 | | insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | Multi-colored Unholy Senate Love Of Her Life | 01/27/13 | | geriatric den | 07/28/12 | | insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | geriatric den | 07/28/12 | | insane crackhouse azn | 07/28/12 | | pink medicated school cafeteria community account | 07/28/12 | | Autistic aquamarine lay | 07/28/12 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/27/13 | | orange theater rigor | 01/28/13 | | Vigorous pea-brained party of the first part forum | 07/28/12 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/27/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/27/13 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/27/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/27/13 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/28/13 | | Snowy fragrant tanning salon | 01/28/13 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/28/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/28/13 | | Snowy fragrant tanning salon | 01/28/13 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/28/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/28/13 | | Snowy fragrant tanning salon | 01/29/13 | | Snowy fragrant tanning salon | 01/29/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/28/13 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/28/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 01/28/13 | | Adventurous shitlib idiot | 01/28/13 | | mind-boggling soggy corner | 07/28/12 | | cobalt skinny woman indirect expression | 07/28/12 | | Azure menage nowag | 01/27/13 | | Yapping School Factory Reset Button | 01/28/13 | | brilliant drunken church building | 01/28/13 | | bisexual hyperventilating dragon dysfunction | 01/28/13 | | Nubile nursing home | 10/02/14 | | Provocative free-loading sneaky criminal | 01/28/13 | | vermilion cruise ship | 10/02/14 | | Rebellious hairy legs brethren | 01/28/13 | | Idiotic whorehouse | 01/29/13 | | yellow boyish chapel roommate | 08/05/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 28th, 2012 8:52 PM Author: insane crackhouse azn
First year BIGLAW, NYC. Lit. Working for a completely unreasonable partner who I am SURE pads his hours. Like, 100%. We're slammed on one particular case, and he tells us he won't add new people to the team if current team members are billing less than 250/month each. He tells us all the time that he bills 280+ every month. The thing is--having ACTUALLY BILLED 300 hours last month myself, I KNOW there is NO WAY this guy is actually billing 280.
300 hours is 10 hours a day 7 days a week. Even assuming a relatively efficient billing rate, that means working 9:30-9:30, EVERY SINGLE DAY all month long. It means no dinners with friends, no Sunday afternoon movies, no weekend trips to visit college friends. Nothing. Just work, gym (maybe) and sleep. Every day.
This partner--I'm not saying he never works, but I've also seen that he has dinner with his wife, sees his kids' softball games, stops off on the way home from business trips to see his folks, etc. Unless he never sleeps, it is physically impossible for him to be billing the kind of hours he says he is.
On the other hand, because he seems to have lied to himself long enough to believe it, he thinks if he can "bill" 280 a month, that we should do 250 no problem
There is NO WAY I can actually bill 250 a month ethically, month after month. One month, sure. Maybe even 2-3 in a row. But not 12 months a year.
I feel like I'm more or less being forced to choose between padding my hours or quitting because 250 is not doable in the long run--not honestly, at least.
Time to start looking for a new job? Or is it like this everywhere?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#21201082) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2012 8:54 PM Author: Abusive athletic conference
srsly faggot - perhaps he works 18 hours some days
diaf you rancid, lazy faggot. not everyone is a lazy malcontent faggot.
CHOKE ON A COCK AND DIE
have a blessed day!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#21201108) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2012 9:24 PM Author: insane crackhouse azn
We were slow when I started (November). So I billed probably 130-160 November-Feb. Dept started getting busy around March. My totals for March-July are 200, 230, 260, 300, 280.
The month I billed 230 was the month the partner said he wouldn't add people to the team unless everyone was billing 250 and the work still wasn't getting done.
The guy in the office next to me billed 200 last month and was added to a new case this month. Also, because of the shitty economy circa 2010 (when we were hiring for fall 2012), we only have 5 new associates beginning this fall, and as far as I know the firm isn't trying to hire any laterals.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#21201362) |
 |
Date: January 28th, 2013 12:41 AM Author: Adventurous shitlib idiot
"are you a biglaw lit asasociate?"
yes, and it sounds like I'm a lot more senior than you are.
"yes most juniors are on very large matters and those very large matters last a very long time with consistent work."
one can hope, but in real life almost all cases settle. some settle right before trial. however, most settle at strategic points like before significant discovery, depositions, etc.
"usually they're doc reviews. if one matter dries up, you do more work on another one you're already on,"
so more work magically shows up on other matters? work that wasn't being done by anyone suddenly is created? the case was understaffed thus allowing a now slow associate to pick up the slack?
"or jump on a new one,"
so there are lots of cases just floating around ITE?
"or do pro bono to fill in the time."
these are not billable hours and thus irrelevant.
"back to the point, this leads to very consistent hours as far as biglaw goes."
not really.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#22517291) |
 |
Date: January 28th, 2013 12:56 AM Author: vermilion cruise ship
At minimum, my experience and your experience are wildly divergent.
I do not believe you are a litigation associate.
Doc reviews are as many hours as you want. At a big law shop there are always doc reviews you can get on (lately).
Pro bono does count for billables at some firms.
90 percent of my months have been 165-185.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#22517364)
|
 |
Date: January 28th, 2013 12:24 AM Author: Adventurous shitlib idiot
there was nothing inconsistent about that sentence, you must be very dumb.
1-3 big matters...
1 "VERY" big matter and a few "SMALLER" (i.e. big but not very big) cases.
still don't understand idiot?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#22517207) |
Date: July 28th, 2012 10:36 PM Author: cobalt skinny woman indirect expression
ITT: OP is mad that his partner makes $1M+ yet sounds like a good dad
"eats dinner with his family... Watches his kids softball games..etc etc"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#21201955) |
Date: January 29th, 2013 12:29 AM Author: Idiotic whorehouse
"Unless he never sleeps, it is physically impossible for him to be billing the kind of hours he says he is."
Not true at all. There are a lot of hours in the day if you use them efficiently (not saying I do, but it's possible).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2007632&forum_id=2#22524396) |
|
|