The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Let's pretend (hypothetically, of course) that I'm a D.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 9th, 2007 7:57 PM Author: flirting drunken shrine How screwed would I be if this were the case? Let's say I didn't participate in the T14 site and that I was just named today. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875600) |
 |
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:01 PM Author: vivacious university what you said probably determines the answer to this. was it something minor or was it horrible? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875623) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:03 PM Author: flirting drunken shrine Nothing. I'm not really a D. This thread was a joke. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875633) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:05 PM Author: vivacious university that doesn't tell me much. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875638) |
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:05 PM Author: flirting drunken shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875640) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:07 PM Author: vivacious university you should offer them the identities of the worst offenders, like paulie in exchange for your release. this is assuming you just had access to the site and didn't say anything bad about them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875647) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:10 PM Author: flirting drunken shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875658) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:11 PM Author: citrine wonderful faggot firefighter Stop snitching. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875664) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:21 PM Author: Glassy awkward weed whacker 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875707) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:13 PM Author: vivacious university if they want them more than they want you, then commonsense suggests that they may be willing to release you if you give them the info. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875672) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:13 PM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875676) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:16 PM Author: flirting drunken shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875689) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 8:19 PM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875698) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:27 PM Author: Turquoise location even if you put in your real email and they got your IP from that, you could plausibly argue that someone else put your email in when they registered for xoxo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876232) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:29 PM Author: vivacious university the judge, however, is not likely to buy that shit. especially if they can match up the writing style with yours, or have some other evidence. his best bet would be to settle that shit if possible and offer up other Ds to save his own ass. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876235) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:36 PM Author: Turquoise location If you lived in law school housing and had a wireless network without a password, it's more than plausible that someone else did it. In that case there would have been 20 or 30 people who could have done it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876249) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:41 PM Author: vivacious university used YOUR email address? very doubtful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876265) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:41 PM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876267) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:43 PM Author: Turquoise location This could also be the case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876271) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:32 AM Author: Scarlet Candlestick Maker if you're a D your friend is fucked unless he sells you down the river. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876545) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:01 AM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876602) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:42 PM Author: Turquoise location Well if you used your fucking school email address you are sunk. Who would do that?
I'm saying they match your IP to an email that was used to create a moniker here.
There's no reason to think that was you at all, if you were running an open wireless network in law school housing. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 9:20 PM Author: ruddy circlehead give them paulie and they may have mercy on you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8875968) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:07 PM Author: supple shimmering nibblets Give them paulie and this entire board will thank you.
And while you are at it, can you suggest to them that while the amended complaint is a huge improvement with respect to writing style, it still needs work.
For example, they have completely messed up the verb tenses in this sentence:
"That person specifically addressed DOE I’s future classmates, telling them to “watch out for her” when she would begin at Yale Law School in the fall."
This is also the first time I have seen the word "trash" used as a verb in a complaint.
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:21 AM Author: Translucent at-the-ready parlour But you still get outed when the Ps use that information unless I am missing a trick. They can't keep your name confidential. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877260) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:11 PM Author: spruce mind-boggling ape knife 1% chance the suit goes any further than it already has (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876171) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:22 PM Author: Glassy awkward weed whacker That's what everyone said back in June. Where are all the Rule 11 sanctions and sua sponte dismissals everyone was talking about then? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876211) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:23 PM Author: spruce mind-boggling ape knife Dunno. I never claimed that would happen.
btw, by "further" I mean substantively further, obviously. |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:24 PM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876219) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:25 PM Author: Milky exciting cuckold station And everyone that said that back in June was right. The case is at the same deadend it was at back then. Everyone also said GTO would get dismissed from the complaint, and he has.
The only miscalculation was at how patient the judge would be with utterly hopeless litigation.
The reason there are no rule 11 sanctions is because nobody sought them. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:04 AM Author: flirting drunken shrine um, the case actually hasn't gotten any further than it was back in june. they've filed for several extensions and dropped the only named plaintiff. they took a few hours to read the board, added a few defendants, and cleaned up their grammar a little bit. this is progress? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876480) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:10 AM Author: Glassy awkward weed whacker You're neglecting to mention that the ENTIRE CASE is staffed with HYS-trained litigators. one of the most elite litigation boutiques in the country is dedicating 10%(!) of its workforce to THIS CASE. This was absolutely not the case in June, and they're ready to proverbially kick ass. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876494) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:11 AM Author: spruce mind-boggling ape knife put down the Boones Farm and go to bed, Brian (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876502) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:25 AM Author: racy theater stage pocket flask 185. And very true.
Just because Keker is a bit slow right now does not mean that they will just come in and kill folks.
The reason dismissals and rule 11's have not happened is because they have not served anyone with the lawsuit. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:01 PM Author: Electric alcoholic trailer park I love that it took someone this long to explain why there has been no rule 11's sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877579) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:19 PM Author: motley orange pit deer antler Even if Rule 11 sanctions were sought, they would not be granted.
But they will never be sought in the first place, at least by any defendant that is represented by an actual attorney.
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:20 PM Author: Electric alcoholic trailer park True, but that really wasn't my point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877632) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:26 PM Author: motley orange pit deer antler rule 11 was the biggest waste of time i can think of from my civ pro classes in law school. completely useless. never used. when used, never granted.
|
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:22 AM Author: flirting drunken shrine first, i'm not sure you understand how work is divvied up in law firms. these 4 lawyers have not been dedicated to the xoxo lawsuit. for each of them, it is most likely the least important of 4 ongoing projects. second, while there are some interesting legal questions surrounding the tort claims, the main issue in this case isn't legal, it's technical: how are the Ps going to identify these 30+ defendants? the few involved in the t14 hotties site might be easy to track down, but not the rest. having served as supreme court editor of the yale law journal isn't going to help the lawyers solve this problem. |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:22 AM Author: Translucent at-the-ready parlour while i agreed with this post, i am amused that you felt it necessary to clarify that the ass kicking would not be literal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877261) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:24 PM Author: Turquoise location Did you use a real email address that you have ever accessed when you registered for xoxo? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876222) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:26 PM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876230) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2007 10:27 PM Author: Turquoise location I dont know. They probably arent. you can put anything in. anything that rach has to store or log costs him extra money, and it makes no sense to do that if you aren't going to sell the emails to spammers at some point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876233) |
|
Date: December 7th, 2007 11:13 PM Author: sepia unhinged hospital Subject: sentiment sentiment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8995354) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:23 AM Author: racy theater stage pocket flask (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876527) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:31 AM Author: embarrassed to the bone garrison rigpig ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876542) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:17 AM Author: impertinent plaza I'm guessing that those that were recently named are in the most trouble. They seem to have been doing some work to find the identities of the Ds, so I don't see why they would add more Ds that they knew they couldn't have a chance of finding out who they really are. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8876653) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:26 AM Author: racy theater stage pocket flask To keep the judge from getting pissed off and kicking the case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877267) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 11:26 AM Author: Appetizing partner boltzmann I love to hypothetically pretend. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877266) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:21 PM Author: Glassy awkward weed whacker They are going to subpoena Google for the T14 Contest website. I'm screwed because I helped with the website but wasn't a named defendant, and never posted a picture of HI. Still screwed, though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877433) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 12:25 PM Author: flirting drunken shrine i'm in the same boat, we'll split attorney costs if outted, deal? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877449) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2007 1:03 PM Author: ruddy circlehead are you one of the people who refused to take down pictures when asked? if so, why were you so stupid? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=714675&forum_id=2#8877592) |