So will Obama be forced to resign over this Benghazi stuff or no
| Histrionic bbw quadroon | 05/10/13 | | spruce foreskin | 05/10/13 | | Insecure idiot | 05/10/13 | | Angry forum persian | 05/10/13 | | Elite Vivacious Boltzmann | 05/10/13 | | Elite Vivacious Boltzmann | 05/10/13 | | cream messiness theatre | 05/10/13 | | Histrionic bbw quadroon | 05/10/13 | | cream messiness theatre | 05/10/13 | | Ebony coffee pot office | 05/10/13 | | Bull headed mind-boggling twinkling uncleanness gunner | 05/11/13 | | aphrodisiac address degenerate | 05/10/13 | | Ivory passionate mood | 05/10/13 | | drab lodge | 05/10/13 | | Vibrant crystalline gay wizard incel | 05/10/13 | | odious mischievous crackhouse laser beams | 05/10/13 | | navy razzle corner | 05/10/13 | | Ebony coffee pot office | 05/10/13 | | Fragrant Alpha | 05/10/13 | | flesh beta theater stage | 07/14/13 | | flesh beta theater stage | 07/14/13 | | lfo | 12/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:26 PM Author: Insecure idiot
Its just the right wing hype machine, but it would be pretty lolzy if the House impeached him. obviously no way the senate convicts, but it would be great for the lulz.
sadly John Boehner is no Newton Leroy Gingrich, so this won't happen.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2betting#23172141) |
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:31 PM Author: Angry forum persian
no idea but this is the title of the article on the front of foxnews.com:
AP/Reuters
"Newly released emails are raising additional questions about the Obama administration's story-line on the Benghazi attack, showing top-level efforts to downplay terrorism ahead of public statements by UN Ambassador Susan Rice."
assuming this is true, i think it's just sort of a big "so what".
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2betting#23172153)
|
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:51 PM Author: Elite Vivacious Boltzmann
Love the idiot-liberal Google+ comments on the story:
"I agree totally with you, +Joshua Deighan The problem is that the USA has a history of, and believes in, adversarial justice, which by definition means that SOMEONE must bear the blame, irrespective of facts. Once a "blame" target has been identified, then the looney-tunes from BOTH sides have a "valid" argument (in their minds) of why "X" (the blame) is lousy for America, or his/her political party, or why all OTHER bad things can be attributed to him/her/it."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2betting#23172257) |
|
|