What is the US equivalent to LSE?
| Gay roast beef | 05/18/10 | | Passionate brunch personal credit line | 05/18/10 | | Gay roast beef | 05/18/10 | | maroon hideous wrinkle | 05/19/10 | | Charismatic frisky hissy fit ticket booth | 05/18/10 | | Translucent lodge | 10/03/10 | | Charismatic frisky hissy fit ticket booth | 10/03/10 | | Translucent lodge | 10/10/10 | | Charismatic frisky hissy fit ticket booth | 10/14/10 | | pale whorehouse psychic | 05/18/10 | | Gay roast beef | 05/18/10 | | exciting disturbing institution stain | 05/18/10 | | dashing ruby garrison dog poop | 05/19/10 | | Gay roast beef | 05/19/10 | | dashing ruby garrison dog poop | 05/19/10 | | provocative hairy legs | 05/25/10 | | concupiscible ungodly idiot | 10/03/10 | | fragrant shimmering home | 10/14/10 | | Painfully honest azn | 10/14/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 14th, 2010 6:59 PM Author: Painfully honest azn
The Penn comparison is pretty accurate
But factoring the fact elite UK institutions generally suck more relative to the US, LSE is more equivalent to something like Emory or Georgetown.
LSE has a lot of sharp undergrads and PhD students, but they suck for most things. If we take the median student at LSE UG, they're more similar to the students you'd find at Georgetown/Emory/WUSTL. If we're taking one-and-done masters students (minus anything commerce related), quality takes a major dip, and would probably be comparable intelligence-wise to UC-San Diego or WashU--meaning, there are a few really sharp people, but the median student is rather pedestrian.
Undergrad finance/business kids are sharp, probably a slight notch below Wharton. Business school is top-10 material. Not HSW level, but similar to Columbia and Tuck.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1314789&forum_id=3#16295207) |
|
|