What is the US equivalent to LSE?
| twinkling pozpig | 05/18/10 | | turquoise impressive spot shitlib | 05/18/10 | | twinkling pozpig | 05/18/10 | | Odious church | 05/19/10 | | Swashbuckling property electric furnace | 05/18/10 | | snowy feces toilet seat | 10/03/10 | | Swashbuckling property electric furnace | 10/03/10 | | snowy feces toilet seat | 10/10/10 | | Swashbuckling property electric furnace | 10/14/10 | | chrome generalized bond background story | 05/18/10 | | twinkling pozpig | 05/18/10 | | Cerebral School Death Wish | 05/18/10 | | Alcoholic Address Dragon | 05/19/10 | | twinkling pozpig | 05/19/10 | | Alcoholic Address Dragon | 05/19/10 | | Rusted church building | 05/25/10 | | frozen son of senegal ticket booth | 10/03/10 | | Trip station coffee pot | 10/14/10 | | lilac meetinghouse dingle berry | 10/14/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 14th, 2010 6:59 PM Author: lilac meetinghouse dingle berry
The Penn comparison is pretty accurate
But factoring the fact elite UK institutions generally suck more relative to the US, LSE is more equivalent to something like Emory or Georgetown.
LSE has a lot of sharp undergrads and PhD students, but they suck for most things. If we take the median student at LSE UG, they're more similar to the students you'd find at Georgetown/Emory/WUSTL. If we're taking one-and-done masters students (minus anything commerce related), quality takes a major dip, and would probably be comparable intelligence-wise to UC-San Diego or WashU--meaning, there are a few really sharp people, but the median student is rather pedestrian.
Undergrad finance/business kids are sharp, probably a slight notch below Wharton. Business school is top-10 material. Not HSW level, but similar to Columbia and Tuck.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1314789&forum_id=3#16295207) |
|
|