The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
ITT: TTT grad Trademark Examining Attorney
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 15th, 2012 6:54 AM
Attended USPTO.
Profits.
U mad? |
 |
Date: February 15th, 2012 6:54 AM |
|
Date: February 16th, 2012 6:14 PM
halp. |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 1:28 PM |
|
Date: February 16th, 2012 6:24 PM |
|
Date: February 16th, 2012 6:28 PM
Review approximately 15 applications a day.
Between 60 and 90. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2012 6:30 PM |
|
Date: February 17th, 2012 6:49 AM
This is the life. |
|
Date: February 17th, 2012 1:42 PM |
|
Date: February 17th, 2012 1:45 PM
Do you accept it? |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 1:16 PM
No. Unless network is clearly generic based on applicant's particular identification of goods/ services.
Although I would say that autoadmit is likely IC 38.
Thx.
|
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 1:30 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 1:54 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 2:37 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:03 PM
But based on this scenario if it (NETWORK) is, as a matter of fact, distinguishable, it's not part of the mark on the spec. |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:05 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 2:59 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:06 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:23 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:29 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:29 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:42 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:49 PM
Caveat: this is a bit outside my area of expertise |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 3:58 PM |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 4:09 PM
Is it your firm that let it lapse in the first place? If so, that sucks for you. |
|
Date: June 8th, 2012 11:01 PM |