The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
ROFL. So the shitlib argument against zimmerman is...
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:13 PM
Just lol shitlibs.
*Wants to create a world where conscientious neighbors open themselves up to violent assault with no recourse to self defense simply by watching suspicious people and reporting to police* |
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:14 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:25 PM
That word "instructed" is just a lie.
“Okay, we don't need you to do that,” is what the dispatcher actually said.
Even if the dispatcher had used the word "instructed," which he didn't, as a matter of law the dispatcher has no power to instruct anyone.
The judge should strike the affidavit as being false. |
 |
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:36 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:38 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:48 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:35 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:37 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:38 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:39 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 1:44 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:30 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:46 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:51 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:34 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:36 PM
Please explain why, retardishitcans, you've come to the conclusion that no murder investigation is appropriate. tyvmia. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:39 PM
but your description of the facts is quite a bit thinner than the undisputed facts. just about every justified self-defense can be made to look bad using your technique. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:52 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:54 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:57 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:04 PM
but if we want to talk about facts that just can't be denied, we already know that Zimmerman called the cops, that Zimmerman was injured on the front and back of his head, that the funeral parlor owner said that Trayvon showed no injuries, that the cops recorded Zimmerman's injuries as well as grass and wet stains on Zimmerman's back, that the EMTs looked over Zimmerman's injuries (as did the police in that video), that an eye witness has stated on multiple occasions that the eventual shooter was on his back and the eventual dead guy was "pummeling" the eventual shooter and that the eventual shooter was crying out for help, and so on. so your statement of the facts is barely even a caricature. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:06 PM
Go directly to 0L hell. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:08 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:10 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:12 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:16 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:41 PM
This was politically unpopular, so the governor appointed a special prosecutor to get the results that would placate the angry mob.
It's clear from the affidavit they have nothing good on Zim, and a good judge would throw this case out. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:56 PM
Do I think it's a slam dunk? No. But it's not nothing. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:59 PM
When you can't even get your facts straight.. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:03 PM
However, babbling on in generalizations and insults is unreasonable and will not be tolerated. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:15 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:26 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:08 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:09 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/screams-on-911-call-not-zimmermans-forensic-expert-says/2012/04/01/gIQAGHNupS_story.html |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:11 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:13 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:15 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:18 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:22 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:24 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:19 PM
Dude there is tons of shit out there. Notice how ALL those articles are from the 1st or 2nd and not after? |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:23 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:33 PM
Also, an expert selling his own tool has a big motivation for going on national news by making a big claim in order to profit.
Finally, read the article. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:38 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:47 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:54 PM
|
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:07 PM
Kind of funny that if you were not such a fucking moron you would know that they did not have Tray's voice so the >50% match claim was made in the vaccuum. If Zimmerman was in the sealed room alone with just a mic and he screamed these so-called experts would say that the "chance it was his scream is under 50%". The point is, even if his matching softwar was actually legitimate (it aint), the "%" needs to be put in the context of the situation. With only two possible people, you NEED to have the second in order to make any assesment. What happens if they plugged Tray's voice in and found that his was only a 5% match (in comparison to Zim's 48% or w.e)? Anyone with half a brain would realize than that the odds Zim screamed are VERY high, even if the match was "only" 48%.
Your type of stupidity pains me. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:16 PM Bro if I'm reading this thread correctly, I think you and the dood you're responding to agree that the audio analysis done by this shitlib boomer attention whores was -120. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:19 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:17 PM
|
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:19 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:48 PM
Dr. James L. Wayman Biography Dr. Jim Wayman is a research administrator in the Office of Graduate Studies and Research at San Jose State University He received the Ph.D. degree in engineering in 1980 from the University of California, Santa Barbara. In the 1980s, under contract to the U.S. Department of Defense, he invented and developed a biometric authentication technology based on the acoustic resonances of the human head. He joined San Jose State University in 1995 to direct the Biometric Identification Research Program, serving as Director of the U.S. National Biometric Test Center at San Jose State from 1997-2000. He is co-editor of J.Wayman, A. Jain, D. Maltoni and D.Maio (eds) Biometric Systems (Springer, London, 2005), a Fellow of the British Institution of Engineering and Technology, U.K. "Head of Delegation Working Group 1" on the ISO/IEC JTC1 SC37 standards committee on biometrics, a "core member" of the U.K. Biometrics Working Group, and a member Biometrics Experts Committee of the U.K. Home Office. He is a member of the U.S. National Academies of Science/National Research Council Committee "Whither Biometrics?", the NRC Panel on Information Technology, and previously served on the NRC "Authentication Technologies and their Implications for Privacy" committee. He is an honorary Professor of Electronics at the University of Kent, holds 4 patents in speech processing and has served as a paid biometrics advisor to 8 national governments.
|
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:33 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:39 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:42 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:48 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 2:48 PM
I posted the relevant parts of the statute here: http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1923726&mc=1&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:01 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:02 PM
|
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:04 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:14 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:24 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:27 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:08 PM Author: fscknut
The charges were filed, which means PC has already been established.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1923802&forum_id=2#20461668) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:33 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:05 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:08 PM
If you're correct then I retract what I said above. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:10 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:11 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:12 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:54 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 5:58 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 4:15 PM To be fair, you started off arguing that government officials cannot be trusted, and now government officials' trustworthiness is your basis for making the claim that PC was established. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 3:53 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 5:21 PM |
|
Date: April 14th, 2012 7:18 PM |