Date: May 31st, 2012 6:02 PM
Author: Captain James T. Kirk

An employee in a highly visible position of substantial responsibility publicly states his intention to use the physical attractiveness of job applicants' wives as a hiring criterion.

His statement reflects 1) a presumption that the only job applicants who receive serious consideration will be male and 2) that criteria manifestly irrelevant to the applicant's qualifications will determine hiring decisions.

The practices he describes are illegal in some jurisdictions, although I don't know if they're illegal in Tennessee.

Should he be fired for exposing his institution to liability in a lawsuit for employment discrimination?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1960750&forum_id=2#20801215)

Date: May 31st, 2012 6:08 PM
Author: Captain James T. Kirk

oh, not hypothetical

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/vandy-coach-james-franklin-looking-few-hot-wives-160107520.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1960750&forum_id=2#20801239)

Date: May 31st, 2012 6:14 PM
Author: Gitmo Detainee tearing up his HOPE poster

Subtle anti-gay marriage trolling

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1960750&forum_id=2#20801269)