\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options

Hayek: Favored welfare for all (basic income). Reptiles: MAF

...
" " " "  06/16/12
...
" " " "  06/16/12
OBVIOUS FLAME IS OBVIOUS.
Lib praising Zimbabwe's Gini coefficient  06/16/12
Not flame, it is known, Khaleesi
" " " "  06/16/12
I should have said troll. Poors already have a floor income...
Lib praising Zimbabwe's Gini coefficient  06/16/12
Do you mean a negative income tax? Friedman was proponent, t...
jake from statefarm  06/16/12
Many are MAF. You seem pretty mad generally IMO. And no, not...
" " " "  06/16/12
Only MAF at how polarizing shitlibbery has become recently. ...
jake from statefarm  06/16/12
Oh noes!
" " " "  06/16/12
(actual retard)
.,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,,.,,.,.  06/16/12
180
.,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,,.,,.,.  06/16/12
"The assurance of a certain minimum income for everyone...
" " " "  06/16/12
"It is unfortunate that the endeavor to secure a unifor...
Lib praising Zimbabwe's Gini coefficient  06/16/12
Right. But this doesn't negate his position above
" " " "  06/16/12
"The basic conception of classical liberalism, which al...
" " " "  06/16/12


Poast new message in this thread



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 2:49 PM
Author: " " " "



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898190)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 2:52 PM
Author: " " " "



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898203)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 2:55 PM
Author: Lib praising Zimbabwe's Gini coefficient

OBVIOUS FLAME IS OBVIOUS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898208)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 2:56 PM
Author: " " " "

Not flame, it is known, Khaleesi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898214)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:08 PM
Author: Lib praising Zimbabwe's Gini coefficient

I should have said troll. Poors already have a floor income, not sure what your point is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898253)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 2:56 PM
Author: jake from statefarm

Do you mean a negative income tax? Friedman was proponent, too. And, no, reptiles are not MAF, retard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898217)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 2:58 PM
Author: " " " "

Many are MAF. You seem pretty mad generally IMO. And no, not a neg income tax specifically in Hayek's case

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898219)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:00 PM
Author: jake from statefarm

Only MAF at how polarizing shitlibbery has become recently. It's like they take every liberal position and assume that the opposite is by default the reptile position, regardless of the economics involved. Life is more nuanced than that, fortunately.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898225)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:02 PM
Author: " " " "

Oh noes!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898230)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:09 PM
Author: .,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,,.,,.,.

(actual retard)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898257)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:09 PM
Author: .,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,,..,,,..,,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,,.,,.,.

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898256)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:01 PM
Author: " " " "

"The assurance of a certain minimum income for everyone, or a sort of floor below which nobody need fall even when he is unable to provide for himself, appears not only to be wholly legitimate protection against a risk common to all, but a necessary part of the Great Society in which the individual no longer has specific claims on the members of the particular small group into which he was born."



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898228)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:13 PM
Author: Lib praising Zimbabwe's Gini coefficient

"It is unfortunate that the endeavor to secure a uniform minimum for all who cannot provide for themselves has become connected with the wholly different aims of securing a ‘just’ distribution of incomes."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898273)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 4:51 PM
Author: " " " "

Right. But this doesn't negate his position above

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898738)



Reply

Date: June 16th, 2012 3:04 PM
Author: " " " "

"The basic conception of classical liberalism, which alone can make decent and impartial government possible, is that government must regard all people as equal, however unequal they may in fact be, and that in whatever manner the government restrains (or assists) the action of one, so it must, under the same abstract rules, restraint (or assist) the actions of all others. Nobody has special claims on government because he is either rich or poor, beyond the assurance of protection against all violence from anybody and the assurance of a certain flat minimum income if things go wholly wrong. Even to take notice of the factual inequality of individuals and to make this the excuse of any discriminating coercion, is a breach of the basic terms on which free man submits to government."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1972064&forum_id=2#20898237)