regional office of a big firm
| ....,.....,,.....,......,,,, | 06/25/12 | | fIame (retired) | 06/25/12 | | ....,.....,,.....,......,,,, | 06/25/12 | | Enjoy DLA Piper, Proles | 06/25/12 | | ....,.....,,.....,......,,,, | 06/25/12 | | fIame (retired) | 06/25/12 | | ....,.....,,.....,......,,,, | 06/25/12 | | fIame (retired) | 06/25/12 | | ....,.....,,.....,......,,,, | 06/25/12 | | Levi-Civita symbol | 06/25/12 | | ..,..,,,..,.,.,.,.,,,..,.,.,..,.,.,. | 06/26/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 25th, 2012 8:08 PM Author: ....,.....,,.....,......,,,,
I had an interview at a somewhat smaller office of a biglaw firm. I was not exactly happy with the interview but one partner, who is a resident of that office (let's call him partner A) seemed to like me while the other, a non-resident, did not like me that much (partner B). I proceedd to the second stage of the interviews and i would need to meet with them separately, first with 'partner B' (because I go to school in the city where the main office is) and then with 'partner A" and partner C, also a resident at the regional office. I will meet with A and C regardless of how the meeting with B turns out.
partner B is a resident at the main office but he does not otherwise do the hiring. He does spend some time at the small office though.
is it true that when a small office of a biglaw firm hires new attorneys, people in the main office will make final decisions? I am so afraid that partner b does not like me enough.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979325&forum_id=2#20956943)
|
Date: June 26th, 2012 2:40 PM Author: ..,..,,,..,.,.,.,.,,,..,.,.,..,.,.,.
u're fine. the partner did not use your second meeting to determine your third.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1979325&forum_id=2#20962069) |
|
|