Date: June 28th, 2012 2:43 PM
Author: slim_shady_man

Third, contrary to THE CHIEF JUSTICE's contention, our precedent does indeed support “[t]he proposition that Congress may dictate the conduct of an individual today because of prophesied future activity.” Ante, at 26. In Wickard, the Court upheld a penalty the Federal Government imposed on a farmer who grew more wheat than he was permitted to grow under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938(AAA). 317 U.S., at 114–115. He could not be penalized, the farmer argued, as he was growing the wheat for home consumption, not for sale on the open market. Id., at 119. The Court rejected this argument. Id., at 127–129. Wheat intended for home consumption, the Court noted, “overhangs the market, and if induced by rising prices, tends to flow into the market and check price increases [intended by the AAA].” Id., at 128.

Similar reasoning supported the Court's judgment in Raich, which upheld Congress' authority to regulate marijuana grown for personal use. 545 U.S., at 19. Homegrown marijuana substantially affects the interstate market for marijuana, we observed, for “the high demand in the interstate market will [likely] draw such marijuana into that market.” Ibid.

*50 Our decisions thus acknowledge Congress' authority, under the Commerce Clause, to direct the conduct of an individual today (the farmer in Wickard, stopped from growing excess wheat; the plaintiff in Raich, ordered to cease cultivating marijuana) because of a prophesied future transaction (the eventual sale of that wheat or marijuana in the interstate market). Congress' actions are even more rational in this case, where the future activity (the consumption of medical care) is certain to occur, the sole uncertainty being the time the activity will take place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20977048)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:45 PM
Author: Albert Clifford "A.C." Slater

"Selling" marijuana and "selling" wheat vs. "consuming" health care. Action vs. inaction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980287)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: wishiwerntapostr

Okay, well you're a retard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980299)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: gooroo

oh stop being a douche he was just flaming.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980306)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: gooroo

LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980301)

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:16 PM
Author: slim_shady_man



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980643)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:59 PM
Author: Seeing Eye Dog Dragging Asian Woman Into Traffic

As it appears in all caps in the middle of a sentence, "THE CHIEF JUSTICE" always comes off as sarcastic/condescending.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980432)

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:05 PM
Author: wishiwerntapostr

lol it does

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980491)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:44 PM
Author: slim_shady_man



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980274)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:46 PM
Author: wishiwerntapostr

I'm inclined to agree, ssm, but it's you, ssm, and you're pretty suspect when it comes to legal reasoning. Sorry, ssm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980295)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: slim_shady_man

Link to where my legal reasoning failed to live up to what you believe is the standard of legal reasoning?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980307)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:49 PM
Author: wishiwerntapostr

See the above poast, in which you wrote, "my legal reasoning failed to live up to what you believe is the standard of legal reasoning?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980332)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:51 PM
Author: slim_shady_man

lol 180 brother. How ir8 are you with the OBamacare opinion today though? Seriously.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980344)

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:58 PM
Author: wishiwerntapostr

I really enjoyed it. Was in a good mood for most of the day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980422)

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:06 PM
Author: slim_shady_man

What about the rest? What bothered you brother?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980514)

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:20 PM
Author: wishiwerntapostr

Roberts stone cold control as he Marshalled Obama.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980685)

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:12 PM
Author: ,,,...,,......,,....

overuse of parentheses

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980583)