Lateral from V100 to V20?
| thaprotester | 07/02/12 | | Zero Dark Turdy | 07/02/12 | | thaprotester | 07/02/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 07/02/12 | | thaprotester | 07/02/12 | | Guys at HBS did that all the time. It was NBD, | 07/02/12 | | thaprotester | 07/02/12 | | fIame (retired) | 07/02/12 | | thaprotester | 07/02/12 | | fIame (retired) | 07/02/12 | | ClassAction | 07/02/12 | | bubblegum | 07/02/12 | | fIame (retired) | 07/02/12 | | thaprotester | 07/02/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 2nd, 2012 2:02 PM Author: thaprotester
Currently at a mediocre V100 but received interview at V20. Currently a second year, so 1.5yrs of experience so far.
Are there any downsides to lateraling up like this? Does it look too soon to be switching firms from a future resume perspective? How long would I have to stick it out at the new firm based on this info?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984709&forum_id=2#21002830) |

Date: July 2nd, 2012 4:28 PM Author: ClassAction
This is firm dependent. If the firm is Wachtell or Williams & Connolly, then you'd be stupid not to move. If the firm is some run of the mill firm, it probably isn't really all that more prestigious or recognizable than your V100.
I would look at your practice area, the city you want to live and then check chambers. If the new firm is band 1 for your practice area and your old firm is band 2 or lower, make the switch. If the new firm is band 2 or lower, the lateral move won't matter much.
Also V20 firms often have worse hours, similar compensation, more competition and surprisingly higher turnover.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1984709&forum_id=2#21003591) |
|
|