Date: July 3rd, 2012 3:52 AM
Author: ,,,...,,......,,....

there are plenty examples of conservative justices crossing over to vote with the libs. which lib has done the same?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007553)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:13 AM
Author: ...,,.,..,,..........,,,.,.,....,,....,.........,

Impossible, using most definitions of "lib"

They are all fucking douche hacks who go with their policy preferences.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007889)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:16 AM
Author: ..,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:..

O'Connor and she's gone.

:( :(

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007901)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:22 PM
Author: ,,,...,,......,,....

oconnor isn't a lib. she was nominated by a republican

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008447)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 9:13 PM
Author: ..,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:..

(guy who hasn't read the ACA decision)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21011514)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:21 AM
Author: fIame (retired)

Breyer often does on law enforcement cases.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007936)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:51 PM
Author: ,,,...,,......,,....

so does Soto, but I don't really consider those cases as natural political dividing lines. thats like pointing to free speech jurisprudence. is there really a coherent party position?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008586)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:25 AM
Author: Stipple Bongos Dog Dick ("_______ here, and even i think ___________ is a _________")

i'm a former breyer clerk, and i'll be the first to admit the liberal wing are unprincipled politcal hacks especially compared to the conservatives on the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007965)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:27 PM
Author: ..,.,..,,,..,,,,...,,,.,.,.,..

no you're not

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008469)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:30 AM
Author: .,.,.;.,..,..,.,:,,:,..,..,::,..,:,.,.:...:,:;.:,.

I like how all of the professors commenting on ACA pretend that Roberts crossing the aisle is the thing that has really shown that the SCOTUS bench is not merely partisan. Yeah, okay. Four justices being predictably in the tank for the liberal vote on every single liberal/conservative divide every single time without exception: not politically partisan, so long as a conservative vote crosses over to them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21007987)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:36 AM
Author: ..,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:..

i'm a libtard and i endorse this message.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008004)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:39 AM
Author: Albert Clifford "A.C." Slater

What about the fact that he was motivated to switch his vote on the issue by a White House lobbying campaign?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008012)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:44 AM
Author: ,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.................

when you elect libtard presidents, you get libtard judges who don't follow "the law" but are rubber stamps for their agenda

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008033)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 10:46 AM
Author: dr. joseph smith's rotting corpse, esq. (like a boss)

when you elect [insert opposing political ideology] presidents you get [insert opposing political ideology] judges who don't [insert preferred approach to jurisprudence] but [insert approach to jurisprudence you oppose].

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008040)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 11:32 AM
Author: ...,,.,..,,..........,,,.,.,....,,....,.........,

Following the law is more than a preferred approach to jurisprudence.

Killself shitlib

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008238)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:24 PM
Author: ,,,...,,......,,....

I see all these NYT articles "why can't republicans get their judges to vote how they want?" hmm maybe cuz some of them aren't political hacks like every lib justice

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008456)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:27 PM
Author: .,.,.;.,..,..,.,:,,:,..,..,::,..,:,.,.:...:,:;.:,.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008467)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:30 PM
Author: ...,,.,..,,..........,,,.,.,....,,....,.........,



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008487)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 12:39 PM
Author: Cow goes Moo

In fairness, who are the principled conservative judges? Thomas? Thats about it. Scalia would be but every so often he jumps the shark and blows it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21008521)

Date: July 3rd, 2012 9:26 PM
Author: .,..;..,;..;,..,.;.,...,.,.;,.,;.,,..,;.,.

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3prsrh/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1985311&forum_id=2#21011587)