ca PT test 1... FML
| ....,,,,,,,,,....,..,.,., | 07/27/12 | | .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,...,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,., | 07/27/12 | | Surprisingly Bountiful Alabaster Power Bottom | 07/27/12 | | ....,,,,,,,,,....,..,.,., | 07/27/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:12 PM Author: ....,,,,,,,,,....,..,.,.,
memo was to partner right? howd you handle bjr (was it even an issue? i just dismissed it in my first section because i didnt think it was applicable like it said in smith). i just did each event partner asked about and analogized/distinguished from the case. threw in some shit about conflicted transactions and new shit they have to show under ag's new rule.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2006318&forum_id=2#21189966) |
 |

Date: July 27th, 2012 1:16 PM Author: .,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,...,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,.,
I discussed BJR.
ENOUGH STOP THINKING ABOUT THE EXAM
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2006318&forum_id=2#21189997) |
 |
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:43 PM Author: ....,,,,,,,,,....,..,.,.,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2006318&forum_id=2#21190235) |
|
|