ITT: I explain why Republicans will lose the fiscal cliff fight
| Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/08/12 | | dashing locale rigpig | 11/09/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/09/12 | | Aromatic fortuitous meteor | 11/12/12 | | magenta talented electric furnace | 11/12/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/14/12 | | Buck-toothed concupiscible foreskin | 11/14/12 | | Buck-toothed concupiscible foreskin | 11/14/12 | | Buck-toothed concupiscible foreskin | 11/14/12 | | Buck-toothed concupiscible foreskin | 11/14/12 | | massive church building faggot firefighter | 11/08/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/08/12 | | Glittery Degenerate Casino | 11/08/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/08/12 | | dashing locale rigpig | 11/09/12 | | Provocative adulterous tanning salon | 11/09/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/10/12 | | Buck-toothed concupiscible foreskin | 11/14/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/14/12 | | white fantasy-prone laser beams stead | 11/08/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/08/12 | | Passionate location main people | 11/10/12 | | Gold cocky menage | 11/08/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/09/12 | | Beady-eyed base toilet seat | 11/09/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/09/12 | | Buck-toothed concupiscible foreskin | 11/14/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/09/12 | | insecure judgmental twinkling uncleanness area | 11/09/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/09/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 02/15/14 | | Abnormal Arousing Rehab Puppy | 11/09/12 | | abusive associate | 11/09/12 | | Abnormal Arousing Rehab Puppy | 11/09/12 | | Abnormal Arousing Rehab Puppy | 04/12/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 04/12/13 | | Abnormal Arousing Rehab Puppy | 04/12/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 04/12/13 | | Abnormal Arousing Rehab Puppy | 04/12/13 | | Razzle-dazzle silver sound barrier plaza | 11/10/12 | | self-centered market | 11/10/12 | | magenta talented electric furnace | 11/12/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 04/12/13 | | Razzle-dazzle silver sound barrier plaza | 11/12/12 | | Khaki Hilarious Stage | 11/12/12 | | jet effete dingle berry persian | 11/14/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/14/12 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Provocative adulterous tanning salon | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Provocative adulterous tanning salon | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | dashing locale rigpig | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 01/02/13 | | Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home | 11/08/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 8th, 2012 11:32 PM Author: Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home
In fact, they can't possibly win and Obama can't possibly lose.
First, the fiscal cliff is not a single event and it won't even be felt right away. It's a cumulative effect, more akin to a wave as money that was expected in the economy never shows up and consumers facing increased tax bills stop spending. The end result is $600 billion taken out of the economy in 2013. It is a combination of several separate pieces of legislation, all of which begin taking effect in 2013. If you change one policy, the others aren't affected.
It will affect every single American, including the unemployed, the working poor, the middle class, the upper middle class, and especially the rich. Every person will have something to bitch about. All of them.
The things that will happen under the fiscal cliff are, in order of size and importance, for 2013:
1. Expiration of the Bush tax cuts and AMT "patch".
2. Expiration of 2% payroll tax cuts.
3. Sequestration.
4. New Obamacare taxes affecting those making more than $250k.
5. Expiration of emergency unemployment insurance.
6. Other tax provisions, including a) dividend tax increases, b) end of the marriage penalty fix, c) end of the EITC, and d) estate tax going to $1 million.
So there are spending cuts (3) and huge tax increases (the rest) scheduled for next year. The Republican position is that they will not allow any tax increases whatsoever. The problem for them is that the baseline scenario, i.e., doing nothing, is a MASSIVE TAX INCREASE. If Republicans fail to act, the only thing that can happen is for huge tax increases to go into effect. With a Democratic president and Senate, they can do nothing without both signing on. Democrats can get things done by poaching a significant number of votes in both houses of Congress (unlikely, but not impossible).
So they're fucked, and here's why.
1) The expiration of the Bush tax cuts. This is the only issue that they REALLY care about, and their position is that the tax cuts should stay for all taxpayers, including those making more than $250,000. Obama agrees with them on everything except those making more than $250,000. Advantage: Obama. If no compromise is reached, taxes will go up on every American in the name of protecting the richest among us, and less than 3% of the country.
2) Expiration of the 2% payroll tax cuts. This is the easiest one. Taxes will go up on all workers, up to ~$2000 a year. Both parties probably want to extend this for another year, but no one is willing to die for it. It hurts everybody and amounts to a tax increase. Advantage: Democrats. The GOP can either agree to extend this for another year or not. Last year they refused to extend it without other agreements. If Democrats offer to do it as a single piece of legislation it will be the GOP voting against a tax cut.
3) Sequestration. This is the spending reduction. Because the super committee failed to balance the budget, sequestration takes place over the next 10 years, with the cuts split evenly between domestic and military spending. This one could go either way. It hurts both parties to the tune of about $25 billion in 2012. The Democrats are going to lose a lot of money for programs they like, the Republicans are going to lose a lot of money for the Military and basic functions of government (like the judiciary) are going to suffer. You can bet that every single lobbyist in Washington will be urging to Congress not to do this. Advantage: TIE.
4) New Obamacare taxes. These are some new tax increases on people making more than $250k per year and tied to the ACA. Obama's not even going to talk about this. Advantage: Obama. Veto pen fired up and ready to go.
5) Expiration of emergency unemployment insurance. This is the expiration of an emergency spending measure. Democrats probably would spend more on it next year, Republicans almost certainly won't want to do that. Advantage: GOP. This is the only thing they could offer Obama, but it would cause some tea partiers to bolt (which they likely will on any deal anyway). Chances are this one simply lives up to its name as an "emergency" spending measure and disappears.
6) Other tax increases. This is one of the smallest parts of of the fiscal cliff, but the shit in here is hilariously bad politics. If neither party solves these, the results will be very NOTICEABLE tax increases with tons of well tested political soundbites that will haunt Democrats and Republicans alike in the 2014 midterms, such as Death Tax, Making Work Pay Credit, the Marriage Penalty. But if you're a GOP congressman, do you really want to have been part of the gang that raised dividend taxes, raised taxes on the working poor, raised taxes on married people, and lowered the threshold for the death tax so that families with just a million in assets have to pay? Lol, no. 3/4 of those are GOP favored taxes, and all of them are politically unpalatable. Advantage: Democrats. They've got tons of goodies to trade here.
There are a few more things, but they're not that important.
So that's why the Republicans are fucked. This will be Obama's first fight after winning reelection and he's not going to lose. He will tolerate a situation where he doesn't win because if he does he will BE THE SINGLE MOST FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE PRESIDENT EVER. He will have slashed the deficit by 50% and put the United States on a sustainable budgetary path. The US will suffer the effects of a drag on GDP growth and the economy will suffer, but it will still grow! The projections are that it's going to cost 2-3 points of GDP growth versus 2-4 percent growth next year.
Meanwhile, he's willing to deal with the GOP but they will have to agree to let the Bush tax cuts expire for those making more than $250k. That's it. They can get everything they want if they'll agree to do that. But if they do that after the gauntlet they've thrown down they lose.
And after winning reelection and with most Americans agreeing that the GOP has been the obstructionist party, Obama is going to win any battle for the hearts and minds of the American people. The GOP is fighting on ideology and Obama will look pragmatic and reasonable to the vast majority of Americans, even Republicans who disagree with him. The GOP will look like rabid dogs fighting on behalf of millionaires.
That's why the GOP will lose the fiscal cliff fight. Enough will cave and vote with Obama (for a ton of pork) or they'll help institute the largest tax increases in history.
Now, they do have one possible option, and that's the nuclear option of refusing to raise the debt ceiling later in 2013. If they tie the debt ceiling to all of this then they are essentially playing a version of Crazy Russian. If Obama doesn't cave in January, he won't in March. The country will be fucked if we're saying we won't pay our debts, but we'll see if the GOP is that crazy then.
IMHO
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22005037) |
Date: November 8th, 2012 11:48 PM Author: white fantasy-prone laser beams stead
You're probably right in your analysis, but I don't think Bams wins this walking away. If he tries to take a hard line while the Republicans honestly come off as if they're trying to compromise, he'll lose the battle regardless of the fact that he was just reelected.
Boehner already signaled this a bit when he said he was open to revenue increases.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22005180) |
|
Date: November 8th, 2012 11:53 PM Author: Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home
Right, Bams does not win by walking away and he does not want to do that.
McConnell went the other direction. We'll see who plays it best, but I think the GOP was just repudiated nationally. I think the best strategy for the GOP would be to solve the fiscal cliff asap and move on. Just fix some of it, get your moderates to cave on the tax increases and then everyone can fight about other stuff while voters start to forget.
The moderates would have to not be worried about primary challenges, but you really only need 30 or so to get it done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22005228) |
|
Date: November 9th, 2012 12:07 AM Author: Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home
Zero leverage for the GOP. The economy is improving and while he doesn't want to raise taxes on the middle class, he could get away with it in the face of GOP intransigence.
Let's say Obama walks away and the Bush taxes will go up. You're John Boehner. What do you say to get Obama back at the table?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22005313) |
Date: November 9th, 2012 1:02 AM Author: insecure judgmental twinkling uncleanness area
To be fair,
CR.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22005630) |
Date: November 9th, 2012 12:59 PM Author: Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home
Still thinking about it and one way for the GOP to avoid losing and reach a deal is to wait until after Jan. 1. Taxes go up immediately, but effect is minimal in January. Then the can sell any agreement as a tax cut and give away taxes on the richest Americans by saying it was the best deal they could get and they lowered taxes for 98 percent of Americans.
So do not expect a deal until January.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22007654) |
Date: November 10th, 2012 10:32 AM Author: self-centered market
I disagree on a lot of it. I think Republicans go to the mat with the need to reform the entire tax code (message: "close loopholes" "fix the entire thing"). The reformed code will bring in more revenue, though it will be changed enough that they may be able avoid discussing how the increased revenue comes from low rates, broader base (which, tbf, is probably better for the country and long-term stability so no complaint out of me).
I also think you don't pay enough credence to the notion that no vote has to be taken for this to happen. It's harder to pin inaction on someone than it is to stick them with their actions. Also, both bills will have enough for either side to demagogue to justify a no vote if it comes to that (though a vote won't be taken if it won't pass).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22013340)
|
Date: November 14th, 2012 10:03 PM Author: jet effete dingle berry persian
Republicans should get whatever they can in exchange for raising taxes on millionaires. Not 250, but millionaires, especially multimillionaires, many of whom voted Obama. Most 300K bros probably voted Roms.
Remmeber though, if things SUCK in the country, for any reason, Obama's getting the blame. People aren't smart enough to blame John Boehner.
Also, how are Obamacare taxes good for Obama?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22046676) |
Date: January 2nd, 2013 1:28 AM Author: Nubile Out-of-control Nursing Home
Did not expect this to be a multi-round bout.
Obama just enacted the biggest and most progressive tax increase since WWII, so I think I have to score Round 1 to him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2108972&forum_id=2#22351810) |
|
|