The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
METAPHYSICS IS GAY V. TED CRUZ SATURDAY SMACKDOWN
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:41 AM Author: thriller national Please post the agreed-upon work ITT. Will await twist's guidance re: judging and format. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065329) |
 |
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:58 AM Author: thriller national Going to wait for twist to moderate / administer this, but after a first (cursory) reading of MIG's essay, I'm pretty psyched. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065393) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 12:02 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks Twist said he's not gonna be around much until later tonight (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065407) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 12:03 PM Author: thriller national Well he's still in charge so we're going to wait for him. This will give judges a few hours to suck on these scholarly sweets, though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065410) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 12:22 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks Seems dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065493) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:26 PM Author: thriller national where is ted cruz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065708) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:57 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison He's "polishing" a stolen essay so it can't be googled. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065845) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:00 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness probably. i used my old plagiarism checker software on metaphysics's paper and it came back with 0%. well done. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065857) |
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:44 AM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065339) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:48 AM Author: soul-stirring goyim quite scholarly
176 |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 12:09 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness Tasty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065442) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 12:36 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic clarity to the point of lucidity unnghnn the scholarly sweet treats |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:42 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison SHOCKED SHOCKED to be forced to give this obviously sophomoric paper a high pass. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065782) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 2:06 AM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks Everything I know about you leads me to believe you're exceptionally retarted. this strengthens my belief (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069728) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:00 PM Author: Awkward trust fund resort LOL! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065858) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:13 PM Author: thriller national I like this. Here are some initial thoughts.
I am a bit troubled by what seems to me to be a conflation between the basic posture of scientific realism--which, in your parlance, admitted at one point of the existence of protons simpliciter--and what you read as Dewey's reconciliation of scientific progress with scientific realism. You mention at the outset that we can still be realists about unobserved scientific phenomena should we adopt Dewey's position, but Dewey's position, as I'm reading it, seems best characterized as a way of denying that the debate really exists, or otherwise as merely denying realism.
After all, says Dewey, all we need is to introduce the concept of an instrumentality, and both realism and the principal objection to realism--that realism posits really-existing objects that account for scientific phenomena--can be saved. And yet it seems to me that, in order for us to 'save' realism, Dewey's instrumentality must, at a minimum, retain the very feature of realism that subjects it to irrealist critique in the first instance.
So many questions will be along the line of: isn't Dewey's defintion of an instrumentality just a vacuity? If we define the instrumentality as just that scientific object that, if it existed, would explain all of our scientific observations relevant to that instrumentality, how is this not fundamentally a concession to the irrealist? It seems to me that Dewey's concept of a scientific instrumentality has no more content than 'wherever you go, there you are'; in other words, Dewey's position seems tacitly irrealist.
So my questions are going to be along the lines of: don't scientific realists claim the existence of protons simpliciter, with the caveat that, hey, we might be wrong? If they do, isn't Dewey's solution to the caveat just a way of conceding that the objects of science are irreal, if we define them as just those real things that: (1) do not exist simpliciter; and (2) explain phenomena but not really anything else? That seems to be to be almost textbook irrealism. So I'll want you to tell me: if I'm an irrealist, why can't I claim Dewey as being in my camp? |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:17 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary lol looks like my objections were just like yours
i will say as a general point that i have read many papers in my career that seem to claim that we can, or that some thinker does, have it both ways. this is almost always false; one or both sides of the debate will probably leave unsatisfied with this solution. if the debate is about realism (whether moral realism, metaphysical realism, whatever), the realists will almost always be unhappy with the way in which someone has it both ways |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:25 PM Author: thriller national yup, that's been my experience too. like, i wrote a paper kind of like this (it was better of course :]) about how the dominant and inclusive readings of aristotle's theoria can be reconciled through like some weird kind of supervenience relationship. it was textbook undergrad, a bit too clever by half. my professor sat me down and was like, this is a clever paper and i'm giving you an A for the course, but did you ever stop to consider that even if it is possible that aristotle could both have meant that theoria is a good life and theoria is contemplation of god, and you could marshal textual support for that, that there is any reason on earth to think that aristotle himself might have some kind of proto-jaegwon kim emergence relationship in mind, some several thousand years before its first introduction in the literature? do you really think he was that good, or are you just retarded?
that like, 10 minute conversation alone gave me an entirely new way of approaching my classes from then on. basically, the key to success in philosophy is to approach problems from a position of radical modesty, or otherwise to be smarter than everyone else. interestingly, those who should be in the first camp (me) often start out thinking they're in the second, and the few who should be in the second almost always think they should be in the first. russell's letter to frege was a cute exception to that, though |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:29 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary yeah. well, undergrad is an immodest time. can't be too hard on yourself about something like that. i was the same way, iirc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066010) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:31 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks this is awesome (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066017) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:43 PM Author: drab filthy stage explain "radical modesty" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066390) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 4:43 PM Author: thriller national by that i mean stake out the most modest position u can possibly take, and argue it as completely as u can (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066829) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 1:35 AM Author: Irate dilemma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069614) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:21 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks tyvm. I will reflect seriously upon your comments (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065969) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:56 PM Author: Exhilarant Medicated Generalized Bond good for a standard form of a freshman level ug essay. i'd like to see more SYLLOGISTIC analysis. in fact, that should be the only thing that you do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068404) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 2:05 AM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks you're obviously maf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069724) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 1:33 AM Author: Irate dilemma the prancing scholar has brought us a treat! your argument was a little hard to follow but honestly you've got balls like ifnb for posting in a scholarship contest and i can't believe this even happened. 180, brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069595) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 2:04 AM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks that mostly has to do with the fact that you're not that smart, and very little to do with my writing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069720) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 2:19 AM Author: Irate dilemma maybe so (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069783) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 6:13 AM Author: Irate dilemma wait are you mad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25070331) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 4:17 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison Why did you delete? You actually wrote that for a class didn't you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25072648) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 12:04 PM Author: thriller national scholarship! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065421) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:33 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary my thing today fell through so no worries.
my suggestion is the following: the five judges, individually, offer a cursory rating in this thread with a few comments. later on, in tinychat, when the papers are presented, we ask questions emerging from these comments. this'll give the writers a little time to prepare and make it a little more of a dialogue. afterwards, the judges can confer and offer a collective rating of the paper and the presentation/response. |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:40 PM Author: Wonderful spruce codepig pit no worries. sounds good man. |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:36 PM Author: Startled narrow-minded lettuce gaping i remember when ifnb was the gayest thing on this board (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065744) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:42 PM Author: avocado irradiated hall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065783) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:47 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary before people started working out in their clothes u mean? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065809) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:59 PM Author: emerald dashing dingle berry a greek slandering naked bodybuilding and philosophy, the cornerstones of grecian civilization?
something smells of kebabs in here...is it you, xerxes? |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:00 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness 180 moniqueer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065859) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:43 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068348) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:45 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison Is Ted Cruz done here? He hypes this shit up and then blows the deadline? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065791) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:45 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary he set it at noon pacific (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065794) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:46 PM Author: Wonderful spruce codepig pit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065795) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:47 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison Wtf? I have to wait another hour? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065807) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 1:53 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness JUDGES'S SUBTHREAD (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065833) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:17 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary preliminary rating for metaphysics is gay: 168
This paper is well-written, strong scholarship, and teaches me a lot about Dewey's views on the philosophy of science, a topic with which I am not very acquainted. However, I wonder if it is a little too uncritical with Dewey, or, put another way, whether it fails to vindicate Dewey's view vis-a-vis the current debates within which it situates that view.
MIGtp makes - among others - the following statements: 1. Dewey believes in the objects of particle physics (here I take "believes in" to mean "posits as part of an ontological scheme") *insofar as* they produce certain behavior, and not as natural kinds. 2. Anti-realism is the view that empirical adequacy does not imply some deep truth about the joint-carving capacities of our theories. It is difficult for me to see how these two in tandem do not make Dewey an anti-realist.
Now MIGtp attempts to evade this criticism of Dewey by suggesting that Dewey's mid-tier "hypothetical objects" have some roughness to them which a final, completed science might not. Or maybe there is no final, completed science; in which case they just lack something natural kinds have. But why posit these hypothetical objects at all? What purpose do they serve? Moreover, why should explanatory adequacy suffice as a measure of their existence, if not for the existence of other, more real(?) objects? It seems to me Dewey, under this presentation, might be giving us not the best of both worlds but the worst of both: the anti-realist's dissatisfaction with explanatory adequacy as a measure of deep ontology and of the world's structure, and the realist's ontological promiscuity.
In responding to this criticism I urge MIGtp not to accidentally beg the question against either party in the current debate. For example, the paper's penultimate sentence reads ". . . our set of natural kinds." The realist, of course, does not merely think that there is some subjective, human-determined view of natural kinds, but that there are some objectively real ones out there. |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:22 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks tyvm. I will reflect critically upon your comments (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065972) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:29 PM Author: thriller national what i will say for MIG though; it's clear that he's a very bright UG or has a good UG background, and it's clear he's in an analytic program. there are certain phrases and rhetorical devices that exist, i think, literally only in analytic philo. using 'carving nature at its joints' tells me a lot about you. MIG's use of 'just that' tells me a lot about him. it's like a secret language (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066007) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:30 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary cr. i wonder about these things a lot. i noticed "just that" as well. little winks and nods. i hate some of them tbh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066014) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:32 PM Author: thriller national yeah like i bet for example when u read 'cut the pie however you like, meanings just ain't in the head' it gave u flashbacks to cake right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066023) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:33 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary Grrrr! *making tough face* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066024) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:34 PM Author: thriller national lol u let 433 use your monkeyer? i guess that makes sense (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066027) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:34 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary xo women never not using monkeys for all sorts of purposes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066031) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:35 PM Author: thriller national 180 i'm not as good at pwning as H. is :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066038) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:37 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary close to it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066047) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:44 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068356) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:06 PM Author: Exhilarant Medicated Generalized Bond ljl
"More importantly, that an atom can be better understood today as a nucleus with orbiting electrons, rather than as the earlier plumb pudding model, is not grounds for dismissing the existence of the atom as that referent accountable for certain molecular properties "
the secret language is: "i'm full of shit and just filling the space on the page". |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:01 PM Author: thriller national not at all, that's a perfectly sensible utterance (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068736) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:17 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks an atom determines the molecule. Our description of the atom changes. The atom is whatever that thing is that determines the molecule. That sentences does quite a bit of work to expose the belief in the reality of objects in light of their continuous redescription. You'd know that, but you're obviously not very bright (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068795) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 4:40 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks you missed the entire point of the paper. You can be a realist without believing in object natural kinds. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066803) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 4:41 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary that doesn't seem to be the case the way you presented it, though. i'd have to reread to be sure (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066812) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:14 PM Author: umber theater (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065926) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:16 PM Author: thriller national lol, can't wait for the second part of this succulent scholarly delight (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065942) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:17 PM Author: impressive vivacious circlehead depressive 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065949) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:22 PM Author: Wonderful spruce codepig pit you are pandering to the crowd, little man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25065975) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:35 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison Holy shit you're so screwed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066037) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:36 PM Author: thriller national i can't wait to read the first ever adequate defense of error theory (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066044) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:37 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary this can be a learning experience (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066046) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:39 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison I think we can call it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066058) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:46 PM Author: thriller national i really want to read how my saying vivisection of children is wrong is actually just me saying 'eww, vivisection' tho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066097) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:47 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary but wait! we can have it both ways! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066101) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:47 PM Author: thriller national actual, hard lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066102) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:51 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary cognitivism/non-cognitivism is where i've encountered the most papers with that kind of bent, i think (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066122) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:31 PM Author: coral school fat ankles (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068851) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:39 PM Author: impressive vivacious circlehead depressive doesn't "metaphysics is gay" already have his PhD or something? we need to make the backgrounds of the participants known because it's a fundamentally unfair contest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066057) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:40 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks I graduated from ug. I don't have any other degrees. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066064) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:40 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison (shit lib)
Jesus how about we judge them based on merit. |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:40 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary i'll let the participants decide that. i have no desire to help doobs and pn out these two dudes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066068) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:45 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic stfu tijuana doobs; you snooze, you lose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068359) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:50 PM Author: thriller national 10 minutes to deliver, ted cruz / alia (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066113) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 2:59 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary 1min (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066144) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:01 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness -1 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066147) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:01 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary welp, this was kind of lame, lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066150) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:02 PM Author: thriller national i will say this for ted cruz: i literally cleared a conference call this afternoon off of my schedule today for this. if he just doesn't show up it will be a pretty sick pwn (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066152) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:03 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066157) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:01 PM Author: impressive vivacious circlehead depressive TED CRUZ FLAKE OUT AS I PREDICTED (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066149) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:02 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness Ted cruz, I'm going to assume you're spending this extra time jerking to underage youtube vids and count it heavily against you in scoring. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066154) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:03 PM Author: thriller national if that's the assumption, TC, i will give you a point bump and our scores will cancel no but seriously i propose that each 10 minutes late = -1 LSAT equivalent from score |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:05 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness judging this thing on my phone until i can get home. u lucky, schedule clearing bastard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066168) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:06 PM Author: thriller national i'm honestly MAF about this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066170) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:06 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary tc = tedcruz i imagine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066171) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:07 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness truth. i've got tinychat on the mind. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066176) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:06 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks bros he didn't write anything else, it's over. I'm glad i got 2 thorough comments to ponder, though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066174) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:07 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary i sincerely hth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066178) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:10 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks tyvm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066192) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:10 PM Author: thriller national hope it helps bro in general i want you to know that you seem v. bright by comparison to the typical phil UG. i thought it was a good little rumination |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:11 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks thank you very much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066197) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:11 PM Author: thriller national since we aren't proceeding to subsequent rounds, i would give you an A/A- for an upper division phil course (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066201) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:45 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic kudos to ur sweet treats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068365) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:11 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary cr, he would be among the brightest i've worked with judging by the paper (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066200) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:14 PM Author: Startled narrow-minded lettuce gaping in the final analysis, who pwnd who? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066210) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:14 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary tedcruz pwned judges, judges pwned dewey, dewey pwned metaphysics is gay, metaphysics is gay pwned tedcruz. some of those pwnings might be more properly interpreted as catfishings in current xo cant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066214) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:16 PM Author: thriller national http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5O26Dtubh0 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066224) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:19 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066236) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:46 PM Author: thriller national honestly i never really understood how the fuck wood beats water (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066403) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:49 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary affirmative action, same with paper v. rock (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066417) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 4:35 PM Author: thriller national fucking lol, good point paper covering rock is basically the central premise of shitlib |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:27 PM Author: Startled narrow-minded lettuce gaping are there nudes of any of the parties to be had (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066286) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:27 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary titcqeam (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066289) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:15 PM Author: Multi-colored church wagecucks I'm grateful that tedcruztp gave me the motivation to do this. I enjoyed it very much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066217) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:18 PM Author: racy crackhouse ok so that autist tedcruz is officially done here? can we run him off the board now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066235) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:22 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison Yeah, he is literally done here. Like this board will have any patience for setting PST deadlines and blowing them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066250) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:20 PM Author: umber theater i lost the competition because i didn't finish it before the deadline.
congrats mig - nice essay btw.
however, i will be poasting my finished product later tonight. if you don't want to read it fine. but i will still poast it. i think mig deserves at least one product to compete with since he put all this work into writing.
|
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:22 PM Author: thriller national i'll still read it and judge it on its merits if you wish, though you have rightly conceded the competition to MIG (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066252) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:22 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary agreeing with commacct (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066254) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:24 PM Author: racy crackhouse didn't you give yourself like a month to do this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066264) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:25 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison He set the original deadline for like mid-March. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066276) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 3:29 PM Author: contagious fear-inspiring queen of the night How the hell did you not finish on time? Embarassing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25066303) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 6:05 PM Author: Lascivious scourge upon the earth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067261) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 6:35 PM Author: contagious fear-inspiring queen of the night (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067463) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:46 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068368) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 7:35 PM Author: Wonderful spruce codepig pit i'm just going to go ahead and assume that's not the only reason you lost. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067795) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 7:39 PM Author: Amethyst seedy chad twinkling uncleanness cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067820) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 7:42 PM Author: Wonderful spruce codepig pit holy shit dude, your more brutal than i expect (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067856) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 7:43 PM Author: avocado irradiated hall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067861) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:46 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic ur punishment is that you never change your moniker ever again. this is your scarlet letter. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068373) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 5:18 PM Author: Unhinged business firm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25067070) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:08 PM Author: Wonderful spruce codepig pit pls respond, ted cruz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068178) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 9:47 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic he snoozed he losed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068376) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:20 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison Jesus the more I think about this the more brutal it is. Ted Cruz spent a month hyping this contest. Metaphysics was like I'm done when do you want to post? His article is clear and at least decent.
Then Ted Cruz posts two paragraphs describing the content of an essay he will never write.
Just the most devastating self-pwn of all time. |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:23 PM Author: Beady-eyed Sanctuary it's the scholarly equivalent of this thing i remember someone posting a while ago, years ago, a bukkake video, and everyone was like "look how funny it is there's this one fat guy who just kind of trundles over, dribbles out a few drops, then runs away. even the girl laughs at it" i never really understood what was funny until now but it's basically what ted did (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068526) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:25 PM Author: diverse cruel-hearted senate psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068534) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:43 PM Author: Lilac Soggy Garrison (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068635) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:46 PM Author: avocado irradiated hall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068642) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:00 PM Author: Lascivious scourge upon the earth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068730) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 11:03 PM Author: Stimulating peach box office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068746) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 1:47 PM Author: Lascivious scourge upon the earth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25071598) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2014 10:38 PM Author: Fishy hateful newt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25068608) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 12:49 AM Author: contagious fear-inspiring queen of the night Tijuana doobs, thought you'd be posting this tonight (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069305) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2014 12:53 AM Author: Stirring nofapping mother you just got scammed again (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2500975&forum_id=2#25069337) |