The FEDS are neutral, they don't judge you (jack frost)
| Hairraiser copper step-uncle's house | 04/15/14 | | Black rigpig | 04/15/14 | | Hairraiser copper step-uncle's house | 04/15/14 | | Black rigpig | 04/15/14 | | Hairraiser copper step-uncle's house | 04/15/14 | | Black rigpig | 04/15/14 | | Hairraiser copper step-uncle's house | 04/15/14 | | brindle stirring range | 04/15/14 | | Hairraiser copper step-uncle's house | 04/15/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: April 15th, 2014 1:33 PM Author: Black rigpig
You would still be free to dislike gays in your private life though, and I think that is a relevant point. When the state forces neutrality in the economy it greatly increases the personal liberty of the average person by making it impossible for private beliefs about how people live to be used to threaten them with economic ruin.
I supported Eich being forced out of Mozilla because we live in a world in which workers have few protections, gays can't marry, and conservatives are using private means to advance their cause. That is also how we had to fight virulent racism in the 60s. That doesn't mean that is the best way to handle this sort of thing though. In my ideal society it would be legally impossible to fire anyone personal behavior or views, and such behavior couldn't become truly political because campaign contributions would be limited.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2543990&forum_id=2#25387072) |
|
|