bar bros - q re family law and jdx
| iridescent church | 07/22/14 | | henna stage | 07/23/14 | | iridescent church | 07/23/14 | | henna stage | 07/23/14 | | racy scourge upon the earth | 07/23/14 | | iridescent church | 07/23/14 | | racy scourge upon the earth | 07/23/14 | | henna stage | 07/23/14 | | iridescent church | 07/23/14 | | Amethyst therapy digit ratio | 07/23/14 | | curious milky sanctuary mood | 07/23/14 | | iridescent church | 07/23/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 22nd, 2014 11:51 PM Author: iridescent church
am i right to say that state courts only require personal jurisdiction?
im on DAT THEMIS and the outlines are dogshit on this point. i seem to recall in the federal jurisdiction lecture the lecturer mentioning that state courts are courts of general jurisdiction and can hear any claim as long as there's personal jurisdiction.
is this right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25984969) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:33 AM Author: iridescent church
that's right. ty my brother. that's the ex parte divorce doctrine. much appreciated.
im in a state w/90 day residency rqrmt. i imagine there's in rem for if the marriage occurred there, but DAT THEMIS doesn't even cover it.
~_~
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985416) |
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:20 AM Author: racy scourge upon the earth
i think that is a cr way of looking at it. family law issues are always state law issues so if there is PJ, then they should be able to entertain it.
i dont think you will ever be faced with a Q that deals with whether the court has smj over a divorce, custody, cp/sp, etc. it will probably be focused more on the pj aspect like if the P has lived in the state long enough to file for divorce in it, whether the property is is in the forum, where the child lives, etc
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985352) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:29 AM Author: iridescent church
im a dumb man. i didnt realize that the 90 day residency rqrmt was the general basis for smj to grant a divorce. i didnt piece together that that would also apply to distribution, custody, alimony, etc until just this second.
the reason i was confused about the whole thing is bc the uniform child custody jurisdiction and enforcement act has complex rules regarding smj for granting/modifying child custody.
ty for makign me think this through.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985386) |
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:28 AM Author: curious milky sanctuary mood
lol no
bankruptcy
federal antitrust
federal securities
admiralty
patent/copyright
treason
ambassadors
state vs state
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985382) |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2014 1:31 AM Author: iridescent church
right.
i was more concerned with the family law matter.
confusing post i guess.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2625719&forum_id=2#25985394) |
|
|