\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

2015 Law Firm Financials

Name Revenue RPL PPP Lawyers Sull...
Motley tanning salon
  02/03/16
Goodwin Procter
Motley tanning salon
  02/03/16
Kirkland shatters?
impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate
  02/03/16
Page 2, please!
impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate
  02/03/16
RAN here to poast this.
impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate
  02/03/16
Paul Weiss
Motley tanning salon
  02/03/16
guillotines, get them?
mauve dingle berry sanctuary
  02/03/16
goodwin procter partners make 2 mil? what the fuck is wrong ...
mauve dingle berry sanctuary
  02/03/16
...
concupiscible garrison electric furnace
  02/04/16
It's not S&C but it's not a total shit firm either. Lay...
carnelian trailer park
  02/11/16
greedy kikefuck partners
Bisexual heaven toilet seat
  02/03/16
King and Spalding
Motley tanning salon
  02/04/16
Doodikoff ecstatic.
Magical yapping skinny woman preventive strike
  02/16/16
It's totally cool if we as equity partners brag to our indus...
Mind-boggling church building gay wizard
  02/04/16
Yeah, if the clients get wind that we took the bonus for the...
lime odious personal credit line
  02/04/16
...
Nighttime copper deer antler coldplay fan
  02/04/16
This is literally what they think.
Ultramarine jew
  02/11/16
...
trip private investor dilemma
  03/02/16
It's not a fucking charity. You get paid what your market ra...
Irate Love Of Her Life Chapel
  02/09/16
I hope underemployed TRUMP supporters break into your home a...
Thriller Opaque Mexican Dog Poop
  02/25/16
cr
Amethyst Public Bath
  02/29/16
Dechert
Motley tanning salon
  02/05/16
McDermott
Motley tanning salon
  02/05/16
McDoormat
impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate
  02/05/16
Troutman Sanders
Motley tanning salon
  02/05/16
Cadwalader
Motley tanning salon
  02/08/16
holy shit they are DONE
concupiscible garrison electric furnace
  02/09/16
Holland and Knight
Motley tanning salon
  02/09/16
Venable
Motley tanning salon
  02/09/16
Akin
Motley tanning salon
  02/09/16
Carlton Fields
Motley tanning salon
  02/09/16
Fenwick West
Motley tanning salon
  02/10/16
Steptoe
Motley tanning salon
  02/10/16
Bryan Cave
Motley tanning salon
  02/10/16
Polsinelli
Motley tanning salon
  02/11/16
Covington
Motley tanning salon
  02/11/16
/*\/*\/*\ FRAUD ALERT /*\/*\/*\
Frum rough-skinned property
  02/11/16
https://www.cov.com/en/professionals/h/eric-holder
Pea-brained demanding sex offender prole
  02/11/16
What about the Baker firms?
glittery canary kitchen gunner
  02/11/16
Cooley
Motley tanning salon
  02/11/16
Nigger wop & gook pls
angry wild university
  02/11/16
Irell & Manella
Motley tanning salon
  02/12/16
White and Case
Motley tanning salon
  02/16/16
Fish & Richardson
Motley tanning salon
  02/16/16
Hogan
Motley tanning salon
  02/16/16
Shutts & Bowen
Motley tanning salon
  02/17/16
Dorsey & Whitney
Motley tanning salon
  02/17/16
Sheppard Mullin
Motley tanning salon
  02/17/16
Lowenstein
Motley tanning salon
  02/17/16
Sidley
Motley tanning salon
  02/18/16
Simply Awesome.
impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate
  02/18/16
Greenberg Traurig
Motley tanning salon
  02/18/16
Bracewell
Motley tanning salon
  02/19/16
Ballard Spahr
Motley tanning salon
  02/19/16
Jenner Block
Motley tanning salon
  02/22/16
Arnold and Porter
Motley tanning salon
  02/22/16
Debevoise
Motley tanning salon
  02/23/16
Crowell and Moring
Motley tanning salon
  02/24/16
Arent Fox
Motley tanning salon
  02/24/16
Weil
Motley tanning salon
  02/24/16
Davis Polk
Motley tanning salon
  02/25/16
WilmerHale
Motley tanning salon
  02/25/16
Latham & Watkins
Motley tanning salon
  02/25/16
DLAPiper
Motley tanning salon
  02/25/16
PIllsbury
Motley tanning salon
  02/26/16
OMM
Motley tanning salon
  02/26/16
Orrick
Motley tanning salon
  02/29/16
lmao
concupiscible garrison electric furnace
  02/29/16
Pepper Hamilton
Motley tanning salon
  02/29/16
Andrews Kurth
Motley tanning salon
  02/29/16
PaulHastings
Motley tanning salon
  02/29/16
BakerBotts
Motley tanning salon
  03/02/16
KL Gates
Motley tanning salon
  03/03/16
fucking bayonets.
concupiscible garrison electric furnace
  03/03/16
Gibson Dunn
Motley tanning salon
  03/03/16
Shearman Sterling
Motley tanning salon
  03/03/16
MoFo
Motley tanning salon
  03/03/16
Mayer Brown
Motley tanning salon
  03/04/16
Cahill
Motley tanning salon
  03/11/16
Fried Frank
Motley tanning salon
  03/11/16
Alston Bird
Motley tanning salon
  03/11/16
Baker Hostetler
Motley tanning salon
  03/11/16
Milbank
Motley tanning salon
  03/11/16
VinsonElkins
Motley tanning salon
  03/11/16
Schulte Roth
Motley tanning salon
  03/14/16
Boies Schiller
Motley tanning salon
  03/14/16
Cleary
Motley tanning salon
  03/21/16
read this thread and try to tell me with a straight face tha...
concupiscible garrison electric furnace
  03/21/16
Cravath
Motley tanning salon
  03/21/16
Simpson
Motley tanning salon
  03/21/16
Skadden
Motley tanning salon
  03/21/16
Sullivan
Motley tanning salon
  03/21/16
Kirkland
Motley tanning salon
  03/25/16


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 5:58 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon

Name Revenue RPL PPP Lawyers

Sullivan 1.32(3) 1.65 3.87(5.2) 792(-1.6)

Skadden 2.41(4.1) 1.44 3.13(7.6) 1677(1.4)

Kirkland 2.31(7.2) 1.42(4.3) 3.6(2.7) 1619(2.7)

Cravath 666.5(2.9) 1.41(-3.8)3.56(5.6) 472(6.8)

Simpson 1.28(2.6) 1.33 3.49(-.4) 961(3.4)

Davis Polk 1.07(-.2) 1.2(-2.9) 3.33(1.2) 895(7.5)

GibsonDunn 1.54(4.7) 1.27(4.1) 3.19(4.6) 1214

Latham Watkins 2.65(1.5) 1.22(-2.2)2.91(.3)

Paul Weiss 1.11(7.1) 1.16(6.4) 4.09(6.4) 949(.6)

Debevoise 757(6.5) 1.23(6.5) 2.64(10.9) 615(NC)

Cleary 1.21(-3) 1.01(-4.9)3.08(-4.7)

Weil 1.16(1.1) 1.1(1.5) 2.52(4.8) 1063(NC)

WilmerHale 1.14(6.4) 1.26(8.7) 1.81(12.8) 907

Covington 742.5(5) 935(2) 1.28(-4) 793(2.5)

Sidley 1.87(6.5) 1.05(5.5) 2.07(3.8) 1,778(1)

BoiseShiller 380(10.1) 1.27(3.3) 3.09(2) 300 (6.4)

Irell 200(-19.2) 1.59(2.3) 3.2(-11.6) 126(-20.9)

Milbank 771(1.3) 1.19(-4) 2.77(.7) 649(5.6)

Cahill 365(-4.1) 1.17(.4) 3.36(-7.1) 312(-4.6)

PaulHastings 1.06(5.6) 1.16(1.3) 2.51(6.1) 912

MayerBrown 1.26(2.8) 835(1.2) 1.56(7.6)

SchulteRoth 405.5(1.2) 1.14(NC) 2.33(.6) 355 (1.1)

ShearmanSter 861(1.8) 1.03(-.5) 1.84(-3.7) 840

White and Case 1.52(1) 795(-.6) 2.02(.7) 1914(2)

BakerBotts 704.5(7.9) 1.01(7.4) 1.81(6.2) 699(.7)

VinsonElkins 628(-4) 1.03(-1.4)1.86(-2.1) 608(-2.5)

Hogan 1.82(2.3) 724(-4) 1.25(3) 2516(6)

King Spalding 1.02(9) 2.5(6)

Cooley 912(13.7) 1.14(7.5) 1.89(8.6)

Dechert 890(6) 1(5.4) 2.5(8.5) 884(.8)

Goodwin Proctor 865.5(10.2) 1.1(5.3) 1.99(14) 790(4.6)

ArnoldPorter 650(-6.5) 975(-2) 1.2(-12.6) 666(-4.7)

FriedFrank 505(9.7) 1.23(10.4)2.21(21.5)

Akin 930(7.1) 1.1(3.8) 1.92(1.6) 851

OMM 689.5(3.7) 1.09(8) 1.76(10.3) 634(-4.4)

MoFo 980(1.1) 1.04(6.1) 1.56(9.9) 941(-5)

Orrick 913(4.1) 995(1) 1.15(12.2)

AlstonBird 688(6.6) 915(7.6) 1.75(12.9) 752

KLGates 1.06(-7) 575(-2) 873(5.3) 1852(-5)

Greenberg 1.32(4) 730(-.7) 1.48(3.5) 1809(4.5)

DLA Piper 2.54(2.5) 675(.7) 1.57(5.4)JennerBlock 465(14) 1.07(4.9) 1.72(6.5) 436(8.7)

Cadwalader 463.5(-3.7) 1.04(-2.8) 2.21(-6.8) 448(-1)

Fenwick West 363.5(11.2) 1.2(5.7) 1.6(5.2)

Fish&Richardson 395(10.5) 1.17(13) 1.49(23.1) 338(-2)

Pillsbury 557(-.5) 930(-2.1) 1.19(1.7) 598

McDermott 891.5(-.9) 910(1.1) 1.58(3.3) 981(-1.6)

ShephardMullin 559.5(9.6) 925(5.7) 1.45(5.9)

Holland Knight 744(8) 712 1.25(10) 1044(3.5)

Bryan Cave 617(-2.9) 680(4.6) 805(-1.2) 910(-6.9%)

BakerHostetler 636(9.4) 700(6.1) 930(14.8) 905(3.1)

Troutman 468.5(11) 750(5) 970(21) 626(5.6)

Venable 477(7.9) 800(2) 1.06(11) 596(5.7)

Steptoe 357.5(1.4) 955(4.4) 940(3.3) 374(-2.9)

AndrewsKurth 297(-3.3) 930(2.2) 1.25(2.5) 320(-5)

Lowenstein 252(9.8) 915(9.6) 1.56(14.3) 276(NC)

CrowellMoring 363(-1.5) 825(.6) 1.04(.5) 441 (-2)

DorseyWhitney 336.5(-.6) 660(-2.2)600(-.8) 512(2.4)

PepperHamilton 388.5(1) 785(4) 1.03(8.5) 486(-2.8)

Bracewell 296.5(-12.1)710(-5.3)1.19(-10.5)417(-7.2)

Ballard Spahr 337.5(8.2) 665(5.6) 600(5.3) 507(2)

Arent Fox 282.5(2) 810(NC) 935(NC) 349(1)

Carlton Fields 223(3.5) 630(-.8) 835(.6) 353(4.2)

Polsinelli 410(11.4) 570(7.5) 725(11.5)

Shutts&Bowen 147(7.7) 590(1.7) 465(5.7) 249(6)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29742380)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 5:59 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Goodwin Procter

Goodwin Procter's gross revenues rose by 10.2 percent in 2015, reaching $865.5 million, according to The American Lawyer’s reporting. Revenue per lawyer rose 5.3 percent to $1.1 million, while profits per partner rose 14 percent to $1.99 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202748668740/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-A-Strong-Year-for-Goodwin-Procter-#ixzz3z6MAuicY



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29742381)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 7:24 AM
Author: impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate

Kirkland shatters?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29742454)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 7:24 AM
Author: impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate

Page 2, please!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29742455)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 7:24 AM
Author: impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate

RAN here to poast this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29742457)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 10:06 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Paul Weiss

Paul Weiss raked in $1.109 billion in revenues last year, up by 7.1 percent from $1.036 billion in 2014. Growth in profits per equity partner kept pace, as the firm's all-equity partnership saw average take-home profits surge past the $4 million mark for the first time. PPP stood at $4.09 million, up 6.4 percent from $3.845 million in 2014.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202748743109/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Paul-Weiss-Partner-Profits-Top-4-Million#ixzz3zAHmheVa



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29748039)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 10:11 PM
Author: mauve dingle berry sanctuary

guillotines, get them?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29748083)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 10:11 PM
Author: mauve dingle berry sanctuary

goodwin procter partners make 2 mil? what the fuck is wrong with this country? isn't that some total horseshit firm?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29748077)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 4th, 2016 6:24 AM
Author: concupiscible garrison electric furnace



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29749702)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: carnelian trailer park

It's not S&C but it's not a total shit firm either. Lay worst a top 3 but probably top 2 firm in Boston.

I don't work there by the way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29803274)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 3rd, 2016 10:11 PM
Author: Bisexual heaven toilet seat

greedy kikefuck partners

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29748081)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 4th, 2016 5:58 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: King and Spalding

King & Spalding’s revenue broke the $1bn mark for the first time last year, as its global turnover rose by 9 per cent.

The firm saw its revenue increase from $934m (£638m) in 2014 to $1.02bn (£700m) in the last financial year.

Average profit per equity partner similarly rose from $2.36m to $2.5m, a percentage increase of just under 6 per cent.

http://www.thelawyer.com/king-spalding-turnover-breaks-1bn-barrier/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29749676)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2016 10:39 PM
Author: Magical yapping skinny woman preventive strike

Doodikoff ecstatic.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29847279)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 4th, 2016 6:50 AM
Author: Mind-boggling church building gay wizard

It's totally cool if we as equity partners brag to our industry publication of record about how much insane fucking money we're making.

Oh but from an optics standpoint, we have to freeze associate bonuses and salary to avoid looking greedy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29749716)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 4th, 2016 9:38 AM
Author: lime odious personal credit line

Yeah, if the clients get wind that we took the bonus for the guy who does all their work from $25k to $30k, they're going to push back on bills. You know how it is in this tough economy. But I doubt they'll notice the article gloating about how I took home a record $3 million last year.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29750055)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 4th, 2016 9:39 AM
Author: Nighttime copper deer antler coldplay fan



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29750064)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 9:49 AM
Author: Ultramarine jew

This is literally what they think.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29803197)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 2nd, 2016 7:26 AM
Author: trip private investor dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29959792)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2016 8:32 AM
Author: Irate Love Of Her Life Chapel

It's not a fucking charity. You get paid what your market rate is worth.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29786450)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2016 5:33 PM
Author: Thriller Opaque Mexican Dog Poop

I hope underemployed TRUMP supporters break into your home and slit your throat from ear to ear.

"He should've known to invest more in home security," I'll say. "Those companies don't make all the money they do for nothing."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29915066)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 29th, 2016 8:51 AM
Author: Amethyst Public Bath

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29943178)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 5th, 2016 6:12 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Dechert

Dechert grew gross revenue 6 percent in 2015 and bumped up partner profits by 8.5 percent in a year in which the firm's litigation practice saw double-digit increases.

And in what firm leadership called a "sign of health," Dechert grew revenue per lawyer (RPL) more than 5 percent to surpass the $1 million mark for the first time.

Read more: http://www.thelegalintelligencer.com/id=1202748907047/Dechert-Grows-PPP-85-Percent-Revenue-6-Percent#ixzz3zI6Y7bUk



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29756689)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 5th, 2016 6:13 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: McDermott

After four years of rising revenue, McDermott Will & Emery saw its gross revenue slip in 2015, while profits rose 3.3 percent for the firm’s somewhat diminished equity partnership.

The Chicago-based firm brought in $891.5 million in revenue last year, a modest decline of 0.9 percent from the $900 million it posted in 2014. The firm’s revenue still sits below pre-recession levels, when it peaked at $978 million in 2007.

Profits per equity partner were $1.58 million, compared to $1.53 million in 2014. Net income was relatively flat, dropping 0.8 percent to $308 million. The firm had fewer equity partners to share the wealth: 195, down from 203 in 2014.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202748899466/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-McDermott-Sees-Modest-Revenue-Decline#ixzz3zI6q1iSI



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29756690)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 5th, 2016 7:35 AM
Author: impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate

McDoormat

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29756742)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 5th, 2016 9:27 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Troutman Sanders

Troutman Sanders had a blockbuster year in 2015, reporting $468.5 million in revenue, up 11 percent, and net income of $180.8 million, up 14 percent. Profit per equity partner jumped from $805,000 to $970,000—after a $55,000 increase in 2014.

Read more: http://www.dailyreportonline.com/id=1202748872877/Troutman-Sanders-Posts-EyePopping-Year#ixzz3zIthBPar



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29757040)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 8th, 2016 6:13 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Cadwalader

Gross revenue at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft fell 3.7 percent to $463.5 million in 2015, while partner profits declined 6.8 percent to $2.06 million, the firm reported.

Revenue per lawyer also took a hit, dropping 2.8 percent to $1.04 million. The firm added 11 new lateral partners last year, but overall lawyer headcount decreased from 452 to 448.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749052997/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Profits-Continue-to-Slide-at-Cadwalader-#ixzz3zZeUcOyh



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29779014)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2016 6:30 AM
Author: concupiscible garrison electric furnace

holy shit they are DONE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29786294)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2016 5:57 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Holland and Knight

Steven Sonberg, managing partner of the Miami-based firm since 2008, grew gross revenue by 8 percent to $744 million and profits per partner by 10 percent to $1.25 million in 2015.

The revenue was down slightly from the previous year when growth in gross revenue stood at 10 percent. Profits per partner grew by about 10 percent for each of the past two years at one of Florida's largest law firms.

Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202749144464/Holland-amp-Knight-Posts-8-Percent-Revenue-Growth#ixzz3zfQm3rjX



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29786263)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2016 5:59 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Venable

Steven Sonberg, managing partner of the Miami-based firm since 2008, grew gross revenue by 8 percent to $744 million and profits per partner by 10 percent to $1.25 million in 2015.

The revenue was down slightly from the previous year when growth in gross revenue stood at 10 percent. Profits per partner grew by about 10 percent for each of the past two years at one of Florida's largest law firms.

Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202749144464/Holland-amp-Knight-Posts-8-Percent-Revenue-Growth#ixzz3zfQm3rjX



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29786271)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2016 6:05 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Akin

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld saw gross revenue rise 7.1 percent to $930 million in 2015, the year following a lateral hiring spree by the 851-lawyer firm.

Revenue per lawyer at Akin Gump was up 3.8 percent, to $1.1 million, while partner profits inched up 1.6 percent, to $1.92 million, in the first full year after the firm took on a large team from now-defunct Bingham McCutchen.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749182288/Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Gross-Revenue-Jumps-at-Akin-Gump#ixzz3zfSyhbyA



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29786272)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 9th, 2016 6:10 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Carlton Fields

Net income for the Tampa-based law firm rose 6.5 percent to $65.5 million last year from $61.5 million the year before. Otherwise, the financial results were flat, including the closely watched profit per partner category, which inched up 0.6 of a percent to $835,000 from $830,000. Revenue per lawyer dropped 0.8 of a percent to $630,000 from $635,000

Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202749169282/Carlton-Fields-Posts-Higher-Revenue-Net-Income#ixzz3zfU8w8dO



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29786277)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2016 8:57 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Fenwick West

Buoyed by the flourishing tech sector, Fenwick & West continued its growth streak in 2015, with revenues surging 11.2 percent to $363.5 million.

Revenue per lawyer at Fenwick rose 5.6 percent to $1.2 million and net income shot up 8.4 percent to $141.5 million. The firm, which crossed the 300-lawyer threshold in 2015, reported profits per partner of $1.6 million, an increase of 5.2 percent.

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202749304147/Revenue-Up-11-Percent-at-Fenwick#ixzz3zm0dSUcN



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29795695)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2016 9:02 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Steptoe

In fiscal year 2015, the firm grew its gross revenue by $5 million to $357.5 million, a 1.4 percent increase, the firm reported to the American Lawyer this month. Revenue per lawyer rose by $40,000 to $955,000. And profits per partner were up $30,000 to $940,000.

Read more: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202749255778/The-Am-Law-100-The-Early-Numbers-Steptoes-TurnAround-Cuts-Lawyers-Yet-Grows-Revenue#ixzz3zm1ubkYf



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29795715)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 10th, 2016 9:04 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Bryan Cave

The St. Louis-based firm reported $617 million in gross revenue last year, down 2.9 percent from 2014. The most recent year Bryan Cave posted rising revenue was 2013, when the firm pulled in $643 million.

Net income also fell in 2015, down 6.6 percent to $163 million. Profits per partner declined a modest 1.2 percent to $805,000 last year, as the firm’s equity partnership shrank by 5.2 percent to 203 partners. The firm's nonequity partner tier grew 2.8 percent to 190 partners. Average compensation for all partners declined 2.4 percent to $605,000.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749252026/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Revenue-Profits-Down-at-Bryan-Cave#ixzz3zm2XhWnm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29795730)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 7:28 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Polsinelli

Revenue at the Kansas City, Missouri-based firm rose 11.4 percent to $410 million last year, while revenue per lawyer was up 7.5 percent to $570,000. In contrast to the prior year, when profits per partner declined, PPP jumped 11.5 percent to $725,000 in 2015.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749396056/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Polsinelli-Posts-AcrosstheBoard-Gains--#ixzz3zrUWUnVG



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29802899)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 7:31 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Covington

In 2015, the firm experienced 5 percent growth in gross revenue, to $742.5 million. It was a $33.5 million increase from the year before. Revenue per lawyer was up 2 percent, to $935,000. Yet profits per partner sunk 4 percent, to $1,275,000, or a $60,000 decrease from 2014, the firm told The National Law Journal this month.

Read more: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202749379086/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Covingtons-Double-Down-on-Investments-Causes-Dip-in-Profits#ixzz3zrVUWUJu



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29802903)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 10:30 AM
Author: Frum rough-skinned property

/*\/*\/*\ FRAUD ALERT /*\/*\/*\

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29803369)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 10:39 AM
Author: Pea-brained demanding sex offender prole

https://www.cov.com/en/professionals/h/eric-holder

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29803405)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 7:37 AM
Author: glittery canary kitchen gunner

What about the Baker firms?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29802907)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 7:38 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Cooley

Cooley saw net income skyrocket 21.1 percent to $369.5 million as revenue surged 13.7 percent to $912 million.

That translated into revenue per lawyer of $1.14 million, an enviable 7.5 percent increase. Profits per partner rose 8.6 percent to $1.89 million.

http://www.therecorder.com/home/id=1202749443856/?slreturn=20160111073703

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29802908)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2016 10:10 AM
Author: angry wild university

Nigger wop & gook pls

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29803254)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 12th, 2016 6:29 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Irell & Manella

After losing nearly a sixth of its attorneys one year ago, Irell & Manella saw its gross revenue plunge 19.2 percent to $200 million and its net income drop 23.3 percent to $125 million in 2015. Profits per partner also fell 11.6 percent to $3.2 million.

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202749556628/At-Smaller-Irell-Revenue-Shrank-19-Percent#ixzz3zx6LLvX0



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29810817)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2016 10:27 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: White and Case

White & Case maintained its revenues and profits at a high plateau in 2015, inching up about 1 percent to $1,523,500,000 in revenue and $2.02 million in profits per partner, while revenue per lawyer ticked down from $800,000 to $795,000.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749831697/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-White--Case-Shifts-into-Growth-Mode#ixzz40ONmQ4zN



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29847187)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2016 10:33 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Fish & Richardson

After revenue fell 1.4 percent in 2014, the firm achieved double-digit gains across all key metrics in 2015. Gross revenue was up by 10.5 percent to $395 million, and average revenue per lawyer climbed 13 percent to $1.17 million.

The firm’s bottom-line performance was even stronger, with net income leaping 24.8 percent to $158.5 million, driving a 23.1 percent increase in average profit per equity partner, to $1.49 million. The firm’s profit margin rose by four percentage points, to 40 percent.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749792456/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Profits-Leap-at-Fish--Richardson#ixzz40OPF3iwK



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29847234)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2016 10:33 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Hogan

Revenue grew from $1.78 billion in 2014 to $1.82 billion in 2015, an increase of 2.3 percent, Hogan Lovells reported to The American Lawyer this month. Revenue per lawyer declined by 4 percent, or $30,276, to $723,698.

Read more: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202749738453/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Hogan-Lovells-Growth-Hampered-by-Currency-Exchange-Rates#ixzz40OPMQBYz



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29847240)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2016 7:13 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Shutts & Bowen

Shutts & Bowen set a revenue record last year while posting a 7.7 percent gain in gross revenue and a 9.6 percent increase in net income.

That's up considerably from last year when the Miami-based firm posted a 3 percent increase in gross revenue, landing at 175 on the Am Law 200 ranking of top law firms by revenue, and 2 percent in net income.

Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202749831258/Shutts-amp-Bowen-Has-Record-147-Million-in-Revenue#ixzz40QW9SFBJ



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29848917)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2016 7:16 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Dorsey & Whitney

Gross revenue dipped 0.6 percent to $336.5 million in 2015 at Dorsey & Whitney, a 512-lawyer firm with its roots in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Revenue per lawyer dropped 2.2 percent to $660,000 while profits per partner were down 0.8 percent to $600,000.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749821136/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Dorsey-Sees-Slight-Declines-in-Revenue-Profits#ixzz40QX094JJ



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29848924)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2016 7:17 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Sheppard Mullin

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton surfed a financial surge in 2015, as gross revenue rose by 9.6 percent to $559.5 million and net income rose by 11.9 percent to $174 million. Revenue per lawyer grew 5.7 percent to $925,000 and profits per partner increased 5.9 percent to $1.45 million.

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202749855716/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Revenue-Profits-Rise-at-Sheppard-Mullin#ixzz40QXAy2bI



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29848925)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2016 7:21 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Lowenstein

Lowenstein Sandler, which in recent years has pulled away from McCarter & English as New Jersey's top-grossing homegrown firm, is a strong bet to retain that status after marked improvements in its gross revenue and other financial metrics for fiscal 2015.

The firm—based in Roseland but with a substantial transactional practice operating out of New York—posted a 9.8 percent increase in revenue, to $252 million.

Read more: http://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202749797974/Lowensteins-Revenue-up-98-Percent-PPP-Increases-143-Percent#ixzz40QYIaxNp



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29848939)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2016 6:13 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Sidley

The American Lawyer rounded up to $1.867 billion, making for a 6.5 jump in gross revenue in a year when Sidley posted increases across the board. The firm cracked the $1 million mark in revenue per lawyer—up 5.5 percent—and profits per equity partner rose 3.8 percent to surpass $2 million for the first time. Compensation for all partners increased 6.3 percent to $1.36 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202749907968/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Sidley-Partners-Pass-2-Million-Mark-#ixzz40W7afXu6



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29857391)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2016 7:26 AM
Author: impertinent mildly autistic son of senegal associate

Simply Awesome.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29857491)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2016 6:22 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig reported a healthy year in 2015 with gross revenue rising 4 percent to $1.32 billion and profit per partner up 3.5 percent to $1.475 million.

Net income at the international law firm also increased 5.2 percent to $448 million. The lawyer head count rose 4.5 percent to 1,809 lawyers in 38 offices.

The latest financial results are similar to those in 2014 with the exception of revenue per lawyer, which dropped 0.7 of a percent to $730,000 last year.

Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202749914188/UPDATE-Greenberg-Traurig-Results-Fed-by-4-Revenue-Growth#ixzz40W8REhgW



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29857398)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 19th, 2016 7:34 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Bracewell

The firm's gross revenue hit $296.5 million in 2015, down from $337.5 million in 2014, and net income came in at $86 million compared with $105 million in 2014. The average revenue per lawyer was $710,000, down 5.3 percent from $750,000 in 2014, and profits per partner averaged $1.19 million in 2015, down 10.5 percent from $1.33 million the previous year.

Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202750030107/Firm-Finance-Gross-Revenue-Net-Income-Slip-in-2015-at-Bracewell#ixzz40cIVi1mo



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29865917)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 19th, 2016 7:37 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Ballard Spahr

Ballard Spahr grew gross revenue by 8.2 percent in 2015 thanks in large part to two contingency fee payments the firm collected last year.

Read more: http://www.thelegalintelligencer.com/id=1202749927150/Ballard-Spahr-Grows-Revenue-82-Percent-PPP-53-Percent#ixzz40cJEuZNY



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29865926)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2016 6:26 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Jenner Block

For the second consecutive year, Jenner & Block’s revenue surged in 2015, rising 14 percent to $465 million. Revenue per lawyer and profits per partner also increased, with RPL up 4.9 percent to $1.065 million and PPP jumping 6.5 percent to $1.72 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750196228/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Another-Strong-Year-for-Jenner--Block#ixzz40tYx2ERW



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29888042)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2016 7:03 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Arnold and Porter

Arnold & Porter’s gross revenue fell from $694.5 million in 2014 to $650 million, and Bracewell’s income dropped from $337.5 million to $296.5 million last year, according to the firms, which on Friday both confirmed numbers first reported by AmLaw publications.

In addition to the decline in revenue, Arnold & Porter reported that its profits per partner plummeted 12.6 percent from nearly $1.4 million in 2014 to just more than $1.2 million last year. That hit to per partner profit came amid a decrease in the total average attorney headcount at the firm, which fell by 33

http://www.law360.com/articles/761142/revenue-was-down-at-bracewell-and-arnold-porter-in-2015

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29888078)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2016 2:50 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Debevoise

Average profits earned by the firm’s 134 partners grew 10.9 percent, from $2.38 million to $2.64 million, marking a record high and Debevoise’s third straight year of profitability growth.

Debevoise’s overall gross revenue also grew, though at a slower pace. The firm collected $756.9 million in fees in 2015, up 6.5 percent from the prior year.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750397068/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Debevoise-Sees-Jump-in-Partner-Profits#ixzz411SUgZ32



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29897819)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2016 6:21 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Crowell and Moring

Crowell & Moring’s gross revenue went down by $5.5 million, or 1.5 percent, to $363 million in 2015, the law firm told The American Lawyer. Revenue per lawyer stayed about the same, growing only from $820,000 to $825,000. Profits per partner changed the same amount, from $1.03 million to $1.035 million. Net income dropped by $1 million to $99 million in 2015.

Read more: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202750399646/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Crowell-amp-Moring-Reports-Slight-Drop-in-Revenue#ixzz415ErvOOU



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29903397)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2016 6:55 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Arent Fox

Gross revenue increased about 2 percent to $282.5 million. Revenue per lawyer gained $10,000, to $810,000. And net income hit $100 million, a 2 percent increase from 2014, the firm told The American Lawyer this month

Read more: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202750315732/The-Am-Law-200-the-Early-Numbers-Arent-Fox-Weathers-Slowdown-Amid-Some-Growth#ixzz415NFMG4q



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29903426)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2016 3:35 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Weil

Amid declines in partner head count, profits per partner rose by a healthy 4.8 percent over 2014, reaching $2.521 million, Weil reported. Across the firm, revenues crept up by 1.1 percent, from $1.151 billion to $1.164 billion.

“The year was something we’re actually pleased with, with the firm exhibiting steady growth,” said Barry Wolf, Weil’s executive partner.

The firm’s lawyers were slightly more productive than the previous year, with revenue per lawyer rising 1.5 percent to $1.095 million. Net profits, meanwhile, edged up just a half a percent last year to $413.5 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750508118/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Revenue-Edges-Up-at-Weil-Amid-Solid-Profits#ixzz417UOnE1E



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29906291)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2016 6:18 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Davis Polk

Profits per partner among the firm’s all-equity partnership rose to $3.33 million last year, up a slender 1.2 percent from 2014. Overall revenues edged very slightly downward, from $1.072 billion to $1.070 billion. Net earnings stood at $510 million, up 1.2 percent.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750563476/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Engines-Cool-at-Davis-Polk-#ixzz41B4ZLoVd



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29911435)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2016 7:59 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: WilmerHale

Gross revenue grew by almost $70 million, to $1.14 billion in 2015 compared to the year before. Revenue per lawyer was up by $100,000, to $1.255 million. And profits per partner sailed to $1.81 million, from $1.605 million in 2014.

Read more: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202750505289/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Wilmer-Soars-in-Revenue-Profits-With-HighStakes-Crisis-Work#ixzz41BTz3Ee5



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29911633)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2016 5:31 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Latham & Watkins

Last year's Am Law 100 leader squeezed out a revenue increase of about 1.5 percent, to $2.65 billion, after surging 14 percent in 2014. Profits per partner stayed roughly flat at about $2.9 million, and revenue per lawyer decreased slightly to $1.2 million, thanks to a cool second half for deals.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750626526/The-Am-Law-100-Growth-Slows-at-Latham--Watkins#ixzz41DnrG6pU



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29915049)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2016 5:35 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: DLAPiper

DLA’s gross revenue rose 2.5 percent in the last fiscal year, to a new high of $2.54 billion, while average revenue per lawyer inched up 0.7 percent, to $675,000. The firm’s net income fell 9.2 percent to $605.5 million, however, and its profit margin slumped three percentage points, to 24 percent.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750656611/The-Am-Law-100-DLA-Revenue-Tops-25-Billion-But-Profits-Fall#ixzz41DovFrXe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29915076)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2016 7:12 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: PIllsbury

Revenue and revenue per lawyer shrank slightly at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman in 2015, while headcount, and profits per partner inched upGross revenue dipped 0.5 percent to $557 million, while revenue per lawyer dropped 2.1 percent to $930,000. The firm's net income dropped 6.3 percent to $180 million. But with 13 fewer equity partners, PPP increased 1.7 percent to $1.185 million. Pillsbury chair and CEO James Rishwain Jr. said he is not getting caught up any one individual number and that, instead, he is looking ahead at the "big picture" for 2016, with Pillsbury focusing on growth.

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202750724123/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-Pillsburys-Net-Income-Falls-6-Percent#ixzz41H8nxxaE



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29920780)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 26th, 2016 7:18 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: OMM

The 634-lawyer firm reported that gross revenue grew by 3.7 percent to $689.5 million in 2015, while net income jumped 10.9 percent to $299 million.

At the same time, O’Melveny’s profits per partner surged 10.3 percent, rising from $1.595 million in 2014, to $1.76 million in 2015. Revenue per lawyer increased 8 percent to $1.085 million last year.

“Our work levels increased across the board,” said Bradley Butwin, a litigator elected O’Melveny’s chair in 2011. He said that the value of partner shares in the firm grew 16 percent last year.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750719750/The-Am-Law-100-OMelveny--Myers-Makes-a-Rebound#ixzz41HAFcmHo



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29920789)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 29th, 2016 7:05 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Orrick

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe did exactly as it predicted one year ago: it grew its top line. Gross revenue increased 4.1 percent to $913 million, though revenue per lawyer was up just 1 percent to $995,000.

Profits per equity partner surged 12.2 percent, mostly because the firm reported 13 fewer equity partners in 2015.

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202750863990/Orrick-Grows-Top-Line-Partner-Profits#ixzz41YeIuIod



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29942933)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 29th, 2016 8:41 AM
Author: concupiscible garrison electric furnace

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29943147)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 29th, 2016 7:12 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Pepper Hamilton

In a year when it experienced lower demand, Pepper Hamilton was able to grow gross revenue 1 percent thanks in large part to an especially strong corporate practice and contingent fees from its intellectual property practice.

Gross revenue grew from $384.5 million in 2014 to $388.5 million last year.

Revenue per lawyer (RPL) grew 4 percent, as the firm's head count decreased slightly over the year. Revenue per lawyer was $785,000, compared to $755,000 in 2014. Profits per equity partner (PPP) broke the $1 million mark for the first time, growing 8.5 percent from $945,000 to $1.03 million.

Read more: http://www.thelegalintelligencer.com/id=1202750873255/Pepper-Hamilton-Grows-Revenue-1-Percent-PPP-85-Percent#ixzz41YgGmQai



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29942967)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 29th, 2016 7:13 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Andrews Kurth

In 2015, gross revenue at Andrews Kurth was $297 million, compared with $307 million in 2014, and net income came in at $90 million compared with $105 million the previous year. Revenue per lawyer averaged $930,000 in 2015, up 2.2 percent when compared with $910,000 in 2014, and profits per partner averaged $1.235 million, up 2.5 percent when compared with $1.205 million a year earlier.

Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202750806754/Gross-Revenue-Net-Income-Drop-in-2015-at-Andrews-Kurth#ixzz41YgSPfEe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29942971)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 29th, 2016 9:06 PM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: PaulHastings

The firm saw gross revenue rise 5.6 percent to $1.06 billion after passing the billion-dollar mark for the first time last year. Profits per partner kept pace, rising 6.1 percent to $2.5 million, while revenue per lawyer inched up 1.1 percent to $1.16 million at the 912-lawyer firm.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202750947036/The-Am-Law-100-Paul-Hastings-Sees-Growth-Across-the-Board#ixzz41c4KEH00



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29947890)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 2nd, 2016 6:52 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: BakerBotts

More specifically, the firm's revenue per lawyer climbed 7.4 percent to $1,010,000 in 2015, up from $940,000 in 2014. The firm reported its gross revenues jumped 7.9 percent to $704.5 million in 2015, an increase from $653 million in 2014. The firm's net income rose slightly, 0.5 percent, to $301 million in 2015, up from $299.5 million in 2014. But its profits per partner climbed more steeply, rising 6.2 percent to $1,805,000 in 2015, up from $1,700,000 in 2014.

Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202751086605/Baker-Botts-Tops-1M-in-Revenue-Per-Lawyer#ixzz41kIOu07W



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29959766)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 3rd, 2016 6:26 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: KL Gates

K&L Gates saw gross revenue dip 7 percent in 2015, a year in which the firm's head count dropped a net of 100 lawyers, or 5 percent.

In a prepared statement, K&L Gates said revenue fell from about $1.15 billion in 2014 to $1.06 billion in 2015. The firm declined to comment beyond the statement, which also noted that profits per "fully participating" equity partners rose 5.3 percent from about $830,000 to more than $873,000.

Read more: http://www.thelegalintelligencer.com/id=1202751162101/KL-Gates-Sees-Revenue-Fall-7-Percent-PPP-Rise-53-Percent#ixzz41q2FoyC2



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29967362)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 3rd, 2016 6:32 AM
Author: concupiscible garrison electric furnace

fucking bayonets.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29967377)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 3rd, 2016 6:34 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Gibson Dunn

The firm posted a 4.7 percent increase in gross revenues, topping $1.535 billion. Profits per partner were also up, rising 4.6 percent to about $3.19 million. Revenue per lawyer grew 4.1 percent from 2014, to nearly $1.27 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751196833/The-Am-Law-100-Another-Record-Year-for-Gibson-Dunn#ixzz41q4EL6EM



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29967382)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 3rd, 2016 6:34 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Shearman Sterling

After two strong years of catch-up, Shearman & Sterling's turnaround plan hit a speed bump in 2015. Gross revenues grew less than 2 percent to about $860 million, while revenue per lawyer stayed level at $1.025 million, and profits per partner declined 3.7 percent to $1.835 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751193304/The-Am-Law-100-Profits-Dip-at-Shearman--Sterling#ixzz41q4LwTIf



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29967384)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 3rd, 2016 7:40 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: MoFo

After a down year in 2014, Morrison & Foerster saw gross revenue inch up 1.1 percent in 2015 to $979.5 million.

Revenue per lawyer rose 6.1 percent to $1.04 million and profits per equity partner surged 9.9 percent to $1.56 million. Net income rose 1.8 percent to $375.5 million.

Read more: http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202751241681/The-Am-Law-100-MoFo-Boosts-Profits-Despite-Nearly-Flat-Revenue#ixzz41qKnJqoj



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29967471)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 4th, 2016 6:19 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown saw modest growth in 2015, with gross revenue increasing 2.8 percent to $1.257 billion, while revenue per lawyer inched up 1.2 percent to $835,000. Profits per equity partner rose a healthy 7.6 percent to $1.56 million.

The firm’s lawyer headcount increased slightly, rising 1.4 percent to 1,507. The number of equity partners rose 2.1 percent to 286 and the nonequity partner ranks declined less than one percent to 321. Average compensation for all partners rose 7.9 percent to $890,000.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751330446/The-Am-Law-100-Revenues-Edge-Up-at-Mayer-Brown#ixzz41vr4Dj99



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#29977266)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2016 7:06 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Cahill

The firm’s gross revenue dipped 4.1 percent, to $364.5 million, while net income dropped 7.1 percent, to $208 million. Profits per partner were also down last year, slipping another 7.1 percent, to $3.36 million, while revenue per lawyer inched up 0.4 percent, to $1.17 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751922568/The-Am-Law-100-Revenue-Partner-Profits-Dip-at-Cahill-Gordon#ixzz42ayTwGnj



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30031774)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2016 7:06 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Fried Frank

The firm’s gross revenue passed half a billion dollars for the first time in the fiscal year ended Feb. 29, 2016, rising almost 10 percent, to $504.5 million. Average revenue per lawyer climbed 10.4 percent, to a record high of $1.23 million.

Fried Frank’s bottom line performance was even more impressive. Net profit leapt 18.1 percent, to $228.5 million, driving a 21.5 percent increase in average profit per equity partner, to $2.2 million—another firm record. Its profit margin increased by three percentage points, to 45 percent.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751870681/The-Am-Law-100-A-Big-Year-for-Fried-Frank-as-New-Strategy-Pays-Off#ixzz42aybFOlg



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30031775)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2016 7:48 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Alston Bird

Revenue increased 6.6 percent to $688 million and net income increased 10 percent to $247.6 million. That pushed profit per equity partner up to $1,745,000—a $200,000 increase.

Transactional work was busy, said the firm's managing partner, Richard Hays, with the firm advising clients on several billion-dollar deals. Litigation activity also increased, after a lull in 2014 following the resolution of some big cases—notably, a late-2013 settlement for Toyota Motor Corp. in class actions over claims of sudden acceleration defects in cars

Read more: http://www.dailyreportonline.com/id=1202750632624/BillionDollar-Deals-and-Big-Suits-Boost-Revenue-Profit-at-Alston-amp-Bird#ixzz42b9A16b0



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30031831)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2016 7:48 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Baker Hostetler

Still buoyed by its trustee work for Bernard Madoff investors, Baker & Hostetler posted strong financial gains across the board in 2015, with gross revenue rising 9.4 percent, to $633.5 million. Profits per equity partner jumped 14.8 percent, to $930,000, while revenue per lawyer rose 6.1 percent, to $700,000.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751324012/The-Am-Law-100-Profits-Rise-at-Baker--Hostetler-?back=TX#ixzz42b9DM8hu



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30031833)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2016 7:49 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Milbank

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCoy saw gross revenue and partner profits rise slightly in 2015, after two previous years of strong financial growth.

The 649-lawyer Wall Street firm saw its attorney head count rise 5.6 percent in 2015, up from 614 the year before. Milbank reported $771 million in gross revenue last year, an increase of 1.3 percent. Profits per partner remained mostly flat, ticking up 0.7 percent, to $2.765 million, as revenue per lawyer dropped 4 percent, to $1.19 million. Milbank’s net income rose 1.9 percent in 2015, to $402.5 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202751817832/The-Am-Law-100-Milbank-Posts-Modest-Financial-Gains#ixzz42b9I4dkr



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30031834)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2016 7:49 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: VinsonElkins

Gross revenue at Vinson & Elkins declined by 4 percent in 2015 compared with 2014 and net income dipped slightly by 1.4 percent, but chairman Mark Kelly said financial results were impacted by low oil prices and a big investment in contingent-fee litigation.

Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202751451090/Gross-Net-Dip-in-2015-at-Vinson-amp-Elkins#ixzz42b9On9pf



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30031836)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2016 9:23 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Schulte Roth

Revenue at the firm rose to $405.5 million in 2015, an increase of 1.2 percent. Profits per partner were up less than 1 percent, to $2.33 million, on net income of $198 million. Average revenue per lawyer stood unchanged at $1.14 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752080965/The-Am-Law-100-Schulte-Roth-Holds-Steady-in-Revenue-Profits#ixzz42spRaVFB



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30053115)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 14th, 2016 9:23 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Boies Schiller

Gross revenue at Boies Schiller reached $380 million, a 10.1 percent boost over 2014. The number of equity partners at the firm increased by four lawyers, to 47 partners. They shared average profits of $3.1 million, up 2 percent from 2014. The firm reported revenues per lawyer of $1.27 million in 2015, up 3.3 percent.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752059309/The-Am-Law-100-Boies-Schiller-Rides-High-on-Litigation-Waves#ixzz42spWJwb5



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30053116)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2016 6:59 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Cleary

Coming off a record year in 2014, the firm saw its gross revenue decline 3 percent in 2015, to $1.213 billion. Revenue per lawyer dipped 4.9 percent, to $1.01 million, while profits per equity partner slid 4.7 percent, to $3.08 million. Net income stood at $582 million, down 2.6 percent from $597.5 million in 2014.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752596745/Special-Report-A-Return-to-Earth-for-Elite-New-York-Firms#ixzz43XApT7OW



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30103798)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2016 7:17 AM
Author: concupiscible garrison electric furnace

read this thread and try to tell me with a straight face that massive layoffs aren't imminent

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30103816)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2016 7:43 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Cravath

Although the firm advised on a record-breaking $927 billion in deals in 2015, revenues rose a modest 2.9 percent, to $666.5 million, according to reporting by The American Lawyer. Profits per partner at the single-tier grew more than twice as much as last year, however, surging 5.6 percent to $3.56 million. Net income rose 4.6 percent, to $320 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752596745/Special-Report-A-Return-to-Earth-for-Elite-New-York-Firms#ixzz43XM7o014



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30103861)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2016 7:44 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Simpson

After a banner year in 2014 that saw double-digit revenue and profitability growth, the firm couldn’t sustain the trajectory in 2015.

Financial growth last year stalled, with profits per partner at the all-equity firm declining 0.4 percent, to $3.49 million, according to reporting by The American Lawyer. The firm’s revenues increased by 2.6 percent, to $1.278 billion, but average revenues per lawyer declined by 0.7 percent. Net income slipped from $651.7 million to $648.9 million, a decline of 0.4 percent.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752596745/Special-Report-A-Return-to-Earth-for-Elite-New-York-Firms#ixzz43XMADhR4



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30103862)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2016 7:44 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Skadden

The corporate good news drove a revenue surge of 4.1 percent, to $2.41 billion. The firm also became more profitable, with profits per partner at the single-tier firm jumping 7.6 percent, to $3.13 million, according to reporting by The American Lawyer. Net income stood at $1.172 million, up 5.3 percent from 2014.

Lawyer numbers inched up 1.4 percent, to 1,677, while partner head count slid 2.1 percent, to 375.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752596745/Special-Report-A-Return-to-Earth-for-Elite-New-York-Firms#ixzz43XME65KD



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30103863)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2016 7:44 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Sullivan

In a record year for M&A, the single-tier firm was involved in lots more blockbuster deals than in 2015, driving increases of 3 percent in revenues and 5.2 percent in profits per partner, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

Partners took home an average of $3.87 million last year, and profit margins crept to just shy of 50 percent, while revenues swelled to $1.314 billion. Net income rose 4.1 percent, to $650.4 million.

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202752596745/Special-Report-A-Return-to-Earth-for-Elite-New-York-Firms#ixzz43XMI0JjZ



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30103865)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 25th, 2016 7:49 AM
Author: Motley tanning salon
Subject: Kirkland

Kirkland & Ellis had another strong year in 2015, with gross revenue rising 7.2 percent, to $2.305 billion, according to preliminary reporting by The American Lawyer.

While net income increased 7.0 percent, profits per equity partner rose just 2.7 percent, to $3.604 million, as profits were divided among more equity partners. Revenue per lawyer increased 4.3 percent, to $1.424 million. (The firm declined to comment on its financial results for the fiscal year, which ended Jan. 31.)

Read more: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202753117386/The-Am-Law-100-Kirkland--Ellis-Keeps-Revenue-Rising#ixzz43ula0KAA



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3117028&forum_id=2#30132630)