How often did ancient humans eat?
| Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | Violet Disgusting Laser Beams Alpha | 07/11/16 | | 180 mauve dysfunction | 07/11/16 | | Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | wine tripping sneaky criminal | 07/11/16 | | 180 mauve dysfunction | 07/11/16 | | Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | blathering brethren public bath | 03/27/17 | | wine tripping sneaky criminal | 07/11/16 | | talented stage | 07/11/16 | | Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | Grizzly pervert area | 07/11/16 | | Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | Snowy hairraiser gunner goyim | 07/11/16 | | Frisky soul-stirring spot mood | 07/11/16 | | Cordovan Chapel Partner | 07/11/16 | | Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | kink-friendly cobalt lay party of the first part | 07/11/16 | | Supple Cruise Ship | 07/11/16 | | navy indian lodge roommate | 03/27/17 | | big-titted wild den corn cake | 03/27/17 | | Trip copper people who are hurt garrison | 03/27/17 | | Garnet razzle son of senegal coldplay fan | 03/27/17 | | Mint Giraffe | 03/27/17 | | big-titted wild den corn cake | 03/28/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: July 11th, 2016 1:01 AM Author: talented stage
wiki says that but who knows.
It has long been taken for granted that the introduction of agriculture had been an unequivocal progress. This is now questioned in view of findings by archaeologists and paleopathologists showing that nutritional standards of Neolithic populations were generally inferior to that of hunter-gatherers, and that their life expectancy may well have been shorter too, in part due to diseases and harder work. Hunter-gatherers must have covered their food needs with about 20 hours work a week, while agriculture required much more and was at least as uncertain. The hunter-gatherers' diet was more varied and balanced than what agriculture later allowed. Average height went down from 5'10" (178 cm) for men and 5'6" (168 cm) for women to 5'5" (165 cm) and 5'1" (155 cm), respectively, and it took until the twentieth century for average human height to come back to the pre-Neolithic Revolution levels.[55] Agriculturalists had more anaemias and vitamin deficiencies, more spinal deformations and more dental pathologies.[56]
However, the decrease in individual nutrition was accompanied by an increase in population.
The traditional view is that agricultural food production supported a denser population, which in turn supported larger sedentary communities, the accumulation of goods and tools, and specialization in diverse forms of new labor. The development of larger societies led to the development of different means of decision making and to governmental organization. Food surpluses made possible the development of a social elite who were not otherwise engaged in agriculture, industry or commerce, but dominated their communities by other means and monopolized decision-making.[57] Jared Diamond (in The World Until Yesterday) identifies the availability of milk and/or cereal grains as permitting mothers to raise both an older (e.g. 3 or 4 year old) child and a younger child concurrently, whereas this was not possible previously. The result is that a population can significantly more-rapidly increase its size than would otherwise be the case, resources permitting.
Recent analyses point out that agriculture also brought about deep social divisions and in particular encouraged inequality between the sexes.[58]
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3281632&forum_id=2#30899319) |
Date: March 27th, 2017 6:06 PM Author: Trip copper people who are hurt garrison
They had to be thinking about food 24 7
Dats why they took the shitty agriculture revolution deal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3281632&forum_id=2#32931545) |
|
|