« Back to News

TEACHING AND LEARNING

A Pedagogy Questioned

Penn grad student says she’s under fire on campus and off for using a teaching technique that involves specifically calling on students from underrepresented groups.

By Colleen Flaherty

October 20, 2017

91 COMMENTS

Stephanie McKellop

Anyone who’s ever taught a class knows some students say more than others. And most professors eventually develop some way of encouraging quieter students to contribute. In one more formal discussion-management technique, called progressive stacking, professors call on students who may be -- for a variety of reasons -- less likely to have their say. While every student is different, the reasons typically reflect the implicit biases observed outside the classroom, such as those related to race, gender, religion, sexual orientation or disability status. So, according to progressive stacking, a professor would call on a black or Latina woman before a white man, for example.

There’s the rub, at least in one class at the University of Pennsylvania. Stephanie McKellop, a graduate teaching assistant in history there, says she is under attack by fringe-right groups for using progressive stacking in her classes and then tweeting about it. Worse, she says, the university is cowing to such groups instead of supporting her. She’s claimed on social media that her classes were canceled this week and she may be asked to leave her program.

Here's some of what McKellop tweeted earlier this week. Her social media accounts are private, but the posts have since been shared by her supporters, some of whom have contacted Penn on her behalf. The trouble apparently began with a post in which she wrote, "I will always call on my black women students first. Other [people of color] get second-tier priority. [White women] come next. And, if I have to, white men." In a later post, she wrote, "Penn thinks I'm racist and discriminatory towards my students for using a very well worn pedagogical tactic which includes calling on [people of color]."

Tweets from Stephanie McKellop: I tweeted about evening the disparities in the classroom with a pedagogical technique called progressive stacking (link to Wikipedia page on progressive stacking). Because this involves calling on black students more readily than white men, the white nationalists and Nazis were very upset. [They] engaged in doxing and I have screen shots of every stage of their mission that they tweeted publicly, to dogpile [on] the [university] saying I’m racist.Steven J. Fluharty, dean of the School of Arts and Sciences, refuted some of those claims in a statement Thursday, saying that McKellop has not been removed from her program and that Penn has “and will continue to respect and protect the graduate student’s right to due process.”

Penn knows and values the “importance of ensuring that students in groups that were historically marginalized have full opportunity to participate in classroom discussions,” Fluharty added. “Penn is strongly committed to providing respectful work and learning environments for all members of our community.”

Yet Fluharty seemed to validate McKellop’s claim that Penn has taken issue with her teaching style, saying that Penn is “looking into the current matter involving a graduate student teaching assistant to ensure that our students were not subjected to discriminatory practices in the classroom and to ensure that all of our students feel heard and equally engaged.”

McKellop did not immediately respond to an interview request Thursday. A spokeswoman for Penn said that McKellop has not been barred from teaching, but she provided no further details. McKellop’s adviser did not respond to a request for comment.

A number of academics expressed support for McKellop on social media and for progressive stacking. In general, it doesn't mean excluding men or white students from conversations, or forcing underrepresented students to talk. Instead, it means calling on students who want to talk in the reverse order that one might predictably do so, based on social biases.

Jessie Daniels, a professor of sociology at Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, said progressive stacking has been around at least since she was in graduate school in the 1990s. She still uses it informally, to right her own tendency to call on men more frequently than women.

“If I have a class of 40 students, since Hunter is predominantly young women, I may have four or five young men in class,” Daniels said. “There’s still implicit bias, where we value men’s voices more than women’s voices, or men’s voices are deeper and carry more in a class. So I’m always trying to overcome my own bias to pick on men in class more than the women.”

As to whether purposely asking a woman to answer a question over a man was a kind of discrimination, Daniels said, “That gets it the wrong way around. This is a way of dealing with discrimination that we as professors can introduce into the classroom. It’s a good strategy, if you can do it.”

Daniels said she thought that the online backlash against McKellop seemed ripped from the “playbook” of the far right, which has attacked numerous professors involved in issues of race in recent months. Worse still, she said, McKellop, as a graduate student, is a particularly vulnerable target.

Cathy Davidson, director of the Futures Initiative at CUNY’s Graduate Center, has long advocated for inclusive teaching methods, including via the Humanities, Arts, Science and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory, which she co-founded. Davidson said Thursday that she didn’t particularly like progressive stacking, and that other methods seem “far better to me than making judgments on others’ privilege.”

Davidson instead recommended "inventory" methods that require participation by all students in the classroom, such as thoughtful "exit tickets" from a session, think-pair-share exercises or asking everyone to write down and then share a memorable sentence from a given reading.

Daniels said she didn’t know how pervasive progressive stacking is, but underscored that it’s nothing new. As for the situation at Penn specifically, Daniels said it would be unfortunate for the university to punish someone trying to “uphold its values. It would be a very misguided step on the part of Penn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34488558)

Check your deep voice privilege

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34488676)

http://www.history.upenn.edu/sites/www.history.upenn.edu/files/imagecache/content-image/Screenshot_20170329-101753.png

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34488677)

The basic conclusion is blacks who get in to colleges where they aren't qualified get embittered and have tantrums.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34489266)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34490390)

http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/helen_ubinas/university-of-pennsylvania-teaching-assistant-mckellop-progressive-stacking-20171020.html

Yes, who knew discrimination was unlawful!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34493462)

By my year, he was semi aware of these issues and decided to put everyone in the class on index cards so he'd take note if someone was called on and wasn't there. He must have cut one kid's index card wrong. He got called on literally every class. He'd pull a card at random and it would always be this one kid, who would then be on call the whole class. I'm not kidding when I say that this class probably met like 35 times and this kid got called on 30 times. People were outwardly laughing for most of the semester.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34493549)

btw shit could get very real very fast. we hear a lot about the bad stuff white men have done over the years but somehow white women get a pass for all the illogical kooky ways they have fucked up society along the way, especially when feeling morally empowered. Prohibition was a spa compared to what absurd oppression could be coming down the line if more and more white women continue transferring their religious energy/belief into stuff like Black Lives Matter and #MeToo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769768&forum_id=2#34493548)