"Since Charlottesville, the A.C.L.U. has clearly wrestled with what to do when the next case comes along. It indicated on Thursday that, in evaluating whether to take free-speech cases involving public gatherings, the group would consider the potential for violence at the event and whether protesters were going to be carrying firearms. But Ms. Sullivan, the spokeswoman, said that was not a new policy; rather, it reflected existing practices.

“We make decisions on whom we’ll represent and in what context on a case-by-case basis,” the A.C.L.U. said in a statement on Thursday. “The horrible events in Charlottesville last weekend will certainly inform those decisions going forward.”"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182558)

Yes, but only when they request the 'girlfriend experience'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182960)

The #1 TV news show and #1 radio show are both right-wing. This is not niche. You guys are not outliers or rebels or the persecuted fringe.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182607)

The fact that the number one news show and radio show are right-wing, assuming true, does not prove your point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182632)

And at any rate, your 134 IQ brain skipped over my counter to that point and your attribution of its significance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182758)

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/12/inside-the-beltway-top-rated-fox-news-has-record-b/

In radio, Rush, Hannity, Alex Jones, etc. collective listening audience far outstrips NPR, and other mainstream radio doesn't even make the list:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-listened-to_radio_programs

RIGHT WING MEDIA IS NOT FRINGE OR OUTNUMBERED

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182829)

Give me a break spaceporn.

Why don't you tell me why so I can respond to it, if your drug-addled brain can string a few coherent sentences together.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35183049)

Fuck me, that's a good point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182994)

gas millenials

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182342)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3364348&mc=52&forum_id=2

https://imgur.com/a/c1RnG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182604)

waiting for a list of similarly, clearly false reports about Obama -- you can focus on Fox if you want.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182618)

Video footage manipulation[edit]

Jon Stewart reported on his November 10, 2009, broadcast of The Daily Show that Fox News pundit Sean Hannity misrepresented video footage purportedly showing large crowds on a health-care protest orchestrated by Rep. Michele Bachmann. Stewart showed inconsistencies in alternating shots according to the color of the sky and tree leaves, showing that spliced in the shots was footage from Glenn Beck's much larger 9/12 rally which had occurred two months earlier. Hannity estimated 20,000 protesters were in attendance, the Washington Post estimated 10,000 and Luke Russert reported that three Capitol Hill police officers guessed "about 4,000."[109][110] Sean Hannity apologized to his viewers for the error during his November 11, 2009 broadcast.[111] Stewart also has periodically accused Fox of playing video footage out of context, such as when Sean Hannity played footage of Obama stating the DREAM Act could not be passed by executive order to make the president seem hypocritical even though when the footage is continued Obama goes on to clarify that the president does have the authority to halt deportations.[112]

On November 18, 2009, Fox News anchor Gregg Jarrett told viewers that a Sarah Palin book signing in Grand Rapids, Michigan, had a massive turnout while showing footage of Palin with a large crowd. Jarrett noted that the former Republican vice-presidential candidate is "continuing to draw huge crowds while she's promoting her brand-new book", adding that the images being shown were "some of the pictures just coming in to us... The lines earlier had formed this morning."[113] The video was actually taken from a 2008 McCain/Palin campaign rally. Fox senior vice-president of news Michael Clemente issued an initial statement saying, "This was a production error in which the copy editor changed a script and didn't alert the control room to update the video."[113] Fox offered an on-air apology the following day during the same "Happening Now" segment citing regrets for what they described as a "video error" with no intent to mislead.[114]

In September 2010, Fox News anchor Sean Hannity was criticized notably by Jon Stewart and CNN anchor Howard Kurtz, for selectively editing a video of an Obama speech on his program. Before playing the clip, Hannity remarked that there was a "rare moment of honesty" in Obama's speech, playing a video of Obama saying:

Taxes are scheduled to go up substantially next year, for everybody.

It quickly cuts back to Hannity, with Hannity saying, "I know the anointed one will make sure that happens."[115] But upon further inspection, what President Obama fully said was:

Under the tax plan passed by the last administration, taxes are scheduled to go up substantially next year, for everybody.

*************************

Now, I'm sure you'll find some sort of fault with these examples, too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182770)

And these involve Palin and Bachmann's popularity

Also, clearly false news reports about Obama -- news, not opinion.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182808)

Oh my god. I can't. HAHAHAHAHAA. JFC.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182648)

Yes, the press makes mistakes. Everyone does. If you think that the the mistakes made in covering Trump are indistinguishable from those made in covering Obama, you are unhinged.

Is Glenn Greenwald just a right-wing persecuted victim?

https://theintercept.com/2017/09/28/yet-another-major-russia-story-falls-apart-is-skepticism-permissible-yet/

https://theintercept.com/2017/11/05/four-viral-claims-spread-by-journalists-on-twitter-in-the-last-week-alone-that-are-false/

https://theintercept.com/2017/12/09/the-u-s-media-yesterday-suffered-its-most-humiliating-debacle-in-ages-now-refuses-all-transparency-over-what-happened/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182963)

the professional press can dish the critical speech but portrays itself as a helpless child when it faces critical speech.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182625)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182990)

There's about a million examples out there showing many others do not

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35183009)

She is either wilfully ignorant or profoundly stupid.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182762)

http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article169317332.html

This type of thing is what's fueling the white nationalist resurgence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182791)

Libs?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863283&forum_id=2#35182803)