The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
oh what a great supporter of the second amendment!
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 20th, 2018 4:54 PM Author: high-end know-it-all indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35446859) |
Date: February 20th, 2018 4:56 PM Author: Cerebral boistinker https://i1.wp.com/www.thetruthaboutthelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Clarence-Thomas.gif (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35446869) |
 |
Date: February 20th, 2018 4:57 PM Author: high-end know-it-all indian lodge Literally only conservative left (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35446880) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 5:00 PM Author: Pea-brained nighttime garrison is he at least "trading" this for concessions like national concealed-carry and hearing protection/sound suppressors? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35446897) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 7:46 PM Author: flirting preventive strike cruise ship Doubt it. Trump doesn’t think that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35448002) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 5:04 PM Author: Crawly range trading national concealed carry for universal background checks and the 10 day waiting period would be a CR compromise.
The issue is not "common sense" regulation, its that liberals are pushing for symbolic regulation with an eye towards banning all fucking semi automatic rifles and later, handguns.
When mayors in NYC, SF, LA and DC have concealed carry jammed down their fucking throats, when we can admit that the US is a gun owning country and we accept the cost of innocent deaths associates with that, then I am okay with regulation to try to reduce those deaths while maintaining the right to own and carry guns. |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 5:06 PM Author: high-end know-it-all indian lodge Guns don’t kill people; stop retweeting Marxist lpropoganda; there is no evidence that an increase in guns causes more gun deaths (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35446936) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 5:23 PM Author: Crawly range increase in guns is irrelevant - but confiscation of all guns would reduce gun deaths. This is the point shitlibs are trying to hammer us with by citing Australia and Japan. This demonstrates that they are gun grabbers and should be defied at every turn.
But IF gun grabbers were sent out to pasture and thoroughly nulloed, I would be okay with enforcing background checks on everyone. |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 5:25 PM Author: Pea-brained nighttime garrison real talk - the easiest way to reduce overall gun murders would be something like a mandatory federal 5-year term for illegal carry/possession, to be rigorously enforced in the ghetto. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35447055) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 7:45 PM Author: high-end know-it-all indian lodge do you want a background check on people before they print a newspaper article? or express a political opinion? or vote? or join a church? if not, why is the constitutional right to bear a firearm different (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35447991) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 8:06 PM Author: Crawly range voting? yes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35448114) |
|
Date: February 20th, 2018 8:09 PM Author: high-end know-it-all indian lodge beyond a voter id law, which is entirely reasonable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898697&forum_id=2#35448130) |