The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
They are trying to delete Wikipedia entry for "T14"
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:22 PM Author: Bipolar old irish cottage just wanted to let you know so you can chime in and help keep this important term on wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/T14 |
 |
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:22 PM Author: Swollen vibrant office is leiter behind this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5536973) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:24 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead damn, this must be because i brought this article to the attention of the board yesterday (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5536981) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:31 PM Author: Floppy Mahogany Haunted Graveyard They claim that the term is only used by a few internet posters, but it has in fact entered the mainstream. Both Anna Ivey and Richard Montauk--writers of books on law school admissions--refer to the top 14 schools as a distinct entity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537029) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:32 PM Author: slate ratface Didn't that raspy voiced bitch use it? What's her name? The bitch that ran Dukakis's campaign.
edit: Susan Estrich. |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:33 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead susan estrich (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537037) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:02 PM Author: Puce boyish native It amazes me how many Wikipedians will try to pass themselves off as experts in areas they know nothing about. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537283) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:46 PM Author: Demanding sticky market I put the word out now to people I see in school -- do not refer to Wikipedia for shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537574) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 4:48 PM Author: internet-worthy kitty Subject: look what I found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_School_Rankings (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5580687) |
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:04 PM Author: slate ratface "Delete. Neologisms don't belong in Wikipedia. Brian G. Crawford 23:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)"
O RLY?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_RLY%3F |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:14 PM Author: Racy theatre coldplay fan fucking hilarious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537356) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:15 PM Author: Puce boyish native http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brian_G._Crawford (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537362) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:20 PM Author: slate ratface OUTTED!!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537394) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:31 PM Author: slate ratface He's kinda wierd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537457) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:33 PM Author: sienna tantric goal in life public bath masturband? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537464) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:35 PM Author: slate ratface Golden enema - "In sexual slang, a golden enema is an enema where the fluid involved is one's own or another person's urine. The term is also used to describe the act of one person urinating into another person's anus."
Cock vore - "Cock vore is a sexual fetish similar to unbirth, in which a person or persons desire to enter a male's body through their urethra." |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 12:38 AM Author: titillating jet party of the first part wrinkle This guy actually left wikipedia over the "donkey punch" dispute. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5583559) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 1:53 AM Author: Misanthropic principal's office Maybe there is hope for wikipedia yet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5583937) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:15 PM Author: motley brilliant resort I'll devote my entire weekend to saving it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537358) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:18 PM Author: fear-inspiring weed whacker sex offender http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2006/03/from_the_bowels.html
here's leiter talking about how it's "conventional wisdom" that there are 15 top law schools (guess who's the 15th?). the man is truly insane. |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:22 PM Author: Puce boyish native http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&mc=106&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537414) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:27 PM Author: fear-inspiring weed whacker sex offender i haven't been here for a bit, and i sure as hell wasn't going to do a search.
anyway, the man is fucking nuts. |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:32 PM Author: Puce boyish native Jesus Christ:
Warning -- possible coordinated effort: this deletion debate is being discussed at one of the very message boards that is the source of this neologism. [3] Beware of biased attempts to influence this debate, sockpuppetry, anonymous edits, trolling and other shenanigans. Interestingstuffadder 00:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:34 PM Author: slate ratface hahahaha...this is what he does on his WoW breaks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537467) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:34 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead Im convinced that this guy must be Lotsofissues, who has a hardon for punking xoxo.
Isn't this enough:
Keep. The term has appeared in published admissions books by Richard Montauk, Anna Ivey, Robert H. Miller, and Susan Estrich, and is frequently used by prospective students (search for the term at Xoxohth, LawSchoolDiscussion, and 4LawSchool and you'll literally get thousands of threads and hundreds of thousands of posts {not an exageration] referencing the term}), current students (in addition to the message board postings see Penn Law's LALSA using the term Top 14 to refer to Penn's peer schools), professors (in fact the term is so widely used that it's been attacked by Brian Leiter), admissions consultants (including the two most famous ones, Loretta Deloggio and Anna Ivey), pre-law advisors (for a few exmples see the University of Dayton Prelaw Advising Website and SUNY Binghamton's press release bragging about the number of students admitted to the Top 14 law schools), and deans of admissions. This isn't an obscure term to anyone familiar with prestigious law school admissions |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:37 PM Author: Apoplectic onyx quadroon Lotsofissues is a fucking idiot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537499) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:46 PM Author: Puce boyish native Yup. Just a big baby because he's scared that "mainstream recognition" will ruin the "off-topic community" on the college board. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537577) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:34 PM Author: Honey-headed aromatic gas station stock car How do you help keep the article? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537475) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:36 PM Author: Apoplectic onyx quadroon I now have "3" linking to 174's subway thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537493) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 9:37 PM Author: Bipolar old irish cottage Subject: Cooley's wikipedia page needs help too While you're at it, notice that all of the good changes we have made to the Cooley page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooley_law )(notes re TTT status, poop picture, etc) have been deleted...see the page's history for evidence of this. Maybe we should get to work there, too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5537957) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 9:41 PM Author: Coiffed Boiling Water Fucking hilarious.
Why in god's name would Wiki seek to delete something just because it reflects actual elitism in the real world? |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 9:46 PM Author: Coiffed Boiling Water "The frequent posting of the O RLY? owl has annoyed some webmasters to the point that the posting of it on some message boards will result in a user ban."
|
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 10:38 PM Author: Bat-shit-crazy glittery stage turdskin why in gods name do people care so much about wikipedia? or georgetown for that matter? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5538410) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2006 10:44 PM Author: Swollen vibrant office "Keep but add more accurate definition that it is a really limited term used by a specific message board populated by anonymous posters with terrible grades from low ranking schools who use fake IDs to pretend that (a) they go to one of the so-called "prestigous" schools and (b) compensate for appalingly poor grades at the schools that they do attend. Keep with heavy emphasis on the absolute lack of credibility the term, has with any real practitioner of law."
There's Leiter! |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:26 PM Author: Misanthropic principal's office The Wikinerds won
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 22:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:28 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead What the fuck? Keep seems to have won overwhelmingly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576429) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:34 PM Author: Misanthropic principal's office Appeal?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:35 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead seems ripe for it but im too lazy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576454) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:48 PM Author: Curious Lilac Antidepressant Drug Mad-dog Skullcap Search T14, hidden in the tank info page. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576495) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:49 PM Author: Curious Lilac Antidepressant Drug Mad-dog Skullcap en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T14_Heavy_Tank#Production_history (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576498) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:16 PM Author: Curious Lilac Antidepressant Drug Mad-dog Skullcap Shit, its already deleted, how the hell are these Wikinerds so good... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576622) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:17 PM Author: Curious Lilac Antidepressant Drug Mad-dog Skullcap http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T14_Heavy_Tank (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576630) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:23 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead because "interstingstuffadder" is notorious faggot lotsofissues who trolls this board to look for things to delete from wikipedia since everyone here think she's a shithead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576650) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 1:51 AM Author: Glassy Set i'm pretty sure it's because they monitor updates, especially by people who don't have accounts (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5577823) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:14 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead No, I started a thread here saying "Wikipedia has a page for T14?"...within hours it was up for deletion. The page had been there for a while before that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579373) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 8:50 PM Author: pearl athletic conference Goddamn, I hate these fucking Wikinerds. Wikipedia is supposed to be a democratic, community effort; in reality it is run by a cabal of horribly pathetic losers who delete shit they know nothing about, even when the votes were overwhelmingly in favor of keeping the article. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576509) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:00 PM Author: Demanding sticky market And yet at the same time, they insist it's a legitimate source of information. It's really annoying. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576558) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:10 PM Author: titillating jet party of the first part wrinkle Somebody should put it on the deletion review page. I have no idea how to do that, or if you can just stick it on there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576598) |
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:20 PM Author: Misanthropic principal's office I suggest patience. Or rather, I suggest we/somebody put together a solid case before appealing. I thought the post talking about all the legit sources referencing T14 would win the debate, so I think that should be the focus (maybe expanded):
"Keep. The term has appeared in published admissions books by Richard Montauk, Anna Ivey, Robert H. Miller, and Susan Estrich, and is frequently used by prospective students (search for the term at Xoxohth, LawSchoolDiscussion, and 4LawSchool and you'll literally get thousands of threads and hundreds of thousands of posts {not an exageration] referencing the term}), current students (in addition to the message board postings see Penn Law's LALSA using the term Top 14 to refer to Penn's peer schools), professors (in fact the term is so widely used that it's been attacked by Brian Leiter), admissions consultants (including the two most famous ones, Loretta Deloggio and Anna Ivey), pre-law advisors (for a few exmples see the University of Dayton Prelaw Advising Website and SUNY Binghamton's press release bragging about the number of students admitted to the Top 14 law schools), and deans of admissions. This isn't an obscure term to anyone familiar with prestigious law school admissions."
Also, the best thing to do is to beat the Wikinerds with their own rules. They kept harping on the fact that a lot of the 'keeps' were from first-time and anonymous users. We should use Wiki's "Don't bite the newcomers" page to show that their criticisms go against the spirit of Wikinerdworld:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers
|
|
Date: April 13th, 2006 9:25 PM Author: titillating jet party of the first part wrinkle It's pretty obvious that their rules don't matter, and that some crater-faced high school "administrator" is allowed to delete whatever he wants while he waits for his hentai to download. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5576659) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 10:08 AM Author: galvanic ticket booth private investor Subject: Interestingstuffadder here Just so you know, I am one of you. I agree that Lotsofissues is a douche -- he (she?) has interfered with several "worthy" wikipedia projects. I nominated the T14 page for deletion mainly because I had an hour to kill and was bored -- thanks for a good show watching you guys repeatedly pwn those wikipedia fuckers and still lose. Just so you know, if you want to recreate T14 I won't mess with it. Actually, if you include one more source or something so my position will be "justified" I will even vote to keep if someone nominates it for deletion.
Also, why can't you guys get as excited about fucking with the Cooley page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooley_law ) as you were about keeping T14? Although I didnt participate, youhad an interesting effort going there to post an image on human feces (see the page history).."debate" on the matter and all. And we've been successful at including some disparaging comments. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 10:15 AM Author: Puce boyish native Assuming this isn't flame --
It's douchebags like you that make me and rachmiel wonder why the hell we even bother with this site. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 10:20 AM Author: Vivacious cordovan forum place of business " I nominated the T14 page for deletion mainly because I had an hour to kill and was bored."
Next time you have an hour to kill, why not kill self!
Thanks! |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 10:30 AM Author: galvanic ticket booth private investor Oh, do we have some wikipedia defenders here? The thing is a mess and a bad idea...an encyclopedia run by unemployed losers..yeah, that's a great source of knowledge. So stop being so self righteous and get on readding that picture of poop to the Cooley page. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5578904) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 10:33 AM Author: Puce boyish native It has nothing to do with wikipedia, it's about you being a douchebag who takes pleasure in screwing over this site and the people involved with it. I have an emotional attachment to this site, but people like you who not only add nothing but negativity but proactively try to fuck up other people's hard work really make me question whether any of this is worth it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5578915) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 11:03 AM Author: galvanic ticket booth private investor when you say "emotuonal attachment to this site" do you mean xoxohth.com or wikipedia. If the latter, it is unclear to me how anyone could have an "emotional attachment" to this message board, but maybe i am missing something. If you are referring to wikipedia, look..there were legitimate arguments for deleting the T14 article. I stated them and was supported by experienced editors. The only opposition came from anonymous editors and registered editors with very few edits to their names. So maybe, though I did it for shits and giggles, I made a legitimate case for deletion. If my case was actually legitimate, in the end I contributed to making wikipedia better.
But what would make wikipedia much better would be all of you joining the add pictures of poop to the cooley wikipedia page campaign. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 11:05 AM Author: Demanding sticky market "experienced editors" = unemployed assholes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579045) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 11:21 AM Author: Exhilarant area You, my friend, are a feckless, pathetic moron.
GTO has a very legitimate reason to be emotionally attached to this board; he helped found it, he monitors it and pays for it. Unlike you, he actually provides a positive contribution to a successful internet site.
You, however, do the opposite. Your "legitimate" argument was completely destroyed by those in the know; T14 is a phenomena that has been referred to in several articles, as illustrated through the arguments during the deletion process. Hell, even Leiter, who is completely opposed to the concept of T14, often times refers to said concept. True, the concept of the T14 is divisional, but that doesn't make it any less ripe for a wikipedia article; if anything, that makes it more appropriate. T14 is not an agreed upon term, but it is a debated term and people applying to law school should know about it.
I'm still waiting on you to explain exactly how you made wikipedia "better." You provided no good and probably have deprived potential law school applicants with needed information.
Now, why don't you push back your huge glasses, take a long, reflective look at your life, and realize that you are the epitome of a douchebag with vision of grandeur. You do no good, and I'm sure you do this to try to stroke your non-existent ego. Please, go out into the real world and provide some actual good, but until then, stop removing information that people may need later.
|
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 7:02 PM Author: olive indirect expression locale GTO did not help found xoxo. it was boondocks and rachmiel. in fact, i have no idea what purpose GTO serves besides acting like a bitch here, posting his stupid "AutoAdmit" "studies", and creating an ugly portal (www.autoadmit.com) to deserve his status. i dont know if he contributes any money to the project, and if he does, good for him. also, his idiotic tabs on the left hand side of the page are useless, but im glad it provided him with some time to waste. in conclusion, GTO, aside from potentially having a financial stake in xoxo, has done nothing positive, and certainly did not help found it.
HTFH. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 3:57 PM Author: Puce boyish native "If the latter, it is unclear to me how anyone could have an "emotional attachment" to this message board, but maybe i am missing something."
You most certainly are missing something. Then again I'm somehow not surprised, given what you did on wikipedia. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 10:54 AM Author: Demanding sticky market Your life has no purpose. Stop pretending that Wikipedia has any purpose either. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5578992) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:36 PM Author: Swollen vibrant office wow, i thought i was pathetic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579514) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:48 PM Author: alcoholic alpha field is there a page where we can go vote to delete you because that is something I think I would like to do (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579596) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:56 PM Author: Swollen vibrant office indeed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579660) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 11:04 AM Author: cobalt theater stage When you people finally turn 30, this type of shit will become as important as what you had for lunch last Tuesday.
...i am just saying |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 11:23 AM Author: Beady-eyed Garrison You can vote on the deletion review of T14. People with established wikipedia accounts take note...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Top_Fourteen
I am not telling people *how* to vote, so this is not "meatpuppetry" - got that, d-bag administrators? |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:50 PM Author: Misanthropic principal's office You're going to lose because you didn't provide a compelling argument to keep T14. I told you guys to be patient. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579610) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:18 PM Author: federal sickened cruise ship FUCK T14 .... XOXO THERE IS A MORE IMPORTANT DELETION DISCUSSION ON WIKI... WE AS A COMMUNITY MUST ENGAGE OUR SUPERIOR LOGICAL REASONING ABILITY TO DEFEAT WIKIFASCISM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Cleveland_steamer |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:29 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead god what a bunch of wankers. why do they have such a hard on for deleting stuff, even when it is clearly notable? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579476) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:36 PM Author: federal sickened cruise ship yeah i don't know...i think the mods or whoever are just like cops...they love power and exercising it, probably b/c the lack or lacked it in some other area or time of their lives.
of course wiki mods can only exercise it by deleting. i don't understand why they care...it's not like there is any downside to too many entries, it's not a question of cost of printing or limited space. the presumption should be everything stays in unless there is absolutely no reference that a third party could check. |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 12:39 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead this must be it. nothing's worse than people who want to play internet cops. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5579538) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 3:59 PM Author: Puce boyish native Agreed. Internet cops/moderaters/etc. almost never add value, they just destroy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5580402) |
|
Date: April 14th, 2006 4:59 PM Author: Transparent kitchen gaping I talked to a friend at UT Law today and confirmed that Leiter is behind this. She also told me that many students there are embarrassed by his fruitless efforts to deny the general acceptance of T14. It makes UT look jealous and petty. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5580753) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 7:24 PM Author: Glassy Set your random friend at UT happened to know about leiter's anonymous activities on wikipedia?
doubtful. |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 9:03 PM Author: Transparent kitchen gaping Prove it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5588115) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 12:26 AM Author: titillating jet party of the first part wrinkle It's back now and better than ever. Don't fuck it up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_fourteen |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 12:28 AM Author: Bipolar old irish cottage Looks like interestingstuffadder is happier with this new page than he was with the previous one. See his comments on the page's talk page. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5583505) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 12:36 AM Author: titillating jet party of the first part wrinkle Somebody should re-do the disambiguation page for T14 or whatever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5583549) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 12:53 AM Author: Bipolar old irish cottage I just went to do it, but looks like it's already been done (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5583645) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 12:59 AM Author: titillating jet party of the first part wrinkle Great. Now I can die in peace. I wish I had thought to just re-write the article two days ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5583671) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 4:55 PM Author: Demanding sticky market deleted again, what happened? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5586709) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 5:47 PM Author: federal sickened cruise ship i think recreating a deleted entry is a big red flag...
someone should just do a friggin top 15 entry that can be judged on the merits anew...UT is still out so it would be OK. |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 7:25 PM Author: Glassy Set you guys would probably have a lot more luck with this if you'd include your T14 diatribe inside the Law School article. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5587481) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 6:43 PM Author: Salmon talking pocket flask Who cares? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5587205) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2006 9:12 PM Author: Transparent kitchen gaping Leiter will stop at nothing to deny the continued acceptance of the term T14. On Friday, he posted AGAIN about the term on his blog. His transparent attempts to bolster Texas at every turn are pretty sad. Somewhere he sits in a dark office, pizza crumbs dribbling down his sweaty gut, toiling away on Wikipedia to eliminate public knowledge of the T14. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5588186) |
|
Date: April 16th, 2006 10:12 PM Author: swashbuckling giraffe Seriously, this guy is getting pretty pathetic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5595913) |
|
Date: April 17th, 2006 10:10 AM Author: Citrine appetizing nursing home fortuitous meteor To be fair, T14 is a dumbass distinction. Top 6 and even Top 10 make sense. 11-14 are just cling-ons that won't flush and desperately hang on to the top 10 and hop for some sort of prestige. The only people desperately defending the 11-14 thing are people in the bottom half of their class at those schools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5598036) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2006 11:57 AM Author: Bipolar old irish cottage Subject: crazy wikipedia editors just looking over the wiki...looks like there was a huge fight this week about whether t14 could even be mentioned in the law school rankings article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_School_Rankings ). these people are nuts (especially an editor who calls himself "xoxohthblaster"
oh yeah: post poop at cooley wiki article |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2006 2:24 PM Author: Transparent kitchen gaping Why are people so threatened by the term T14? Is it all from Texas and UCLA grads? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5628860) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2006 2:29 PM Author: Ruddy histrionic brunch circlehead fucking psycho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=395903&forum_id=2#5628893) |