\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Dyson kinda pwnd Peterson, tbf

...
Domesticated cuck area
  05/19/18
dyson can be pretty funny
Lascivious at-the-ready sex offender cuckoldry
  05/19/18
Dyson comes across as a hypocritical asshole who likes the s...
Floppy public bath dopamine
  05/19/18
yeah, but he's good at being a grandstanding, uppity coon, a...
Domesticated cuck area
  05/19/18
peterson was smart. if he responded in kind, it would feed i...
Floppy public bath dopamine
  05/19/18
Seriously, I watched that exchange and my thought was “this ...
Bespoke Disturbing Dysfunction Elastic Band
  05/20/18
“Second, it seems probable that this group will seek persona...
ungodly pearly senate nibblets
  05/19/18
xo Ted.
stimulating ebony windowlicker
  05/19/18
actually a judge writing to Yale in 1969 about the probable ...
ungodly pearly senate nibblets
  05/19/18
Where did you find this?
Big-titted site
  05/19/18
it's been bouncing around the internet for a couple of years...
ungodly pearly senate nibblets
  05/19/18
...
Domesticated cuck area
  05/19/18
This is completely spot-on.
Floppy public bath dopamine
  09/01/18
His points were wrong and silly, but he had funny moments. I...
Big-titted site
  05/19/18
I can't stand watching him talk anymore. I've seen his one n...
Fuchsia Beta Parlour
  05/19/18
The old white dude called Dyson a snake oil huckster.
Marvelous immigrant base
  05/19/18
no one cared about what that fag kike had to say
Domesticated cuck area
  05/19/18
...
Citrine lay
  09/01/18
He’s the classic black preacher-type huckster who uses big w...
Floppy public bath dopamine
  09/01/18
...
smoky sanctuary dragon
  05/20/18
real talk: he steamrolled peterson with a wall of animated b...
French yapping quadroon
  09/01/18
guy who believes dyson won
Mustard incel boiling water
  09/01/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:19 PM
Author: Domesticated cuck area



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087806)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:25 PM
Author: Lascivious at-the-ready sex offender cuckoldry

dyson can be pretty funny

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087827)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:31 PM
Author: Floppy public bath dopamine

Dyson comes across as a hypocritical asshole who likes the sound of his own voice but doesn't say anything of substance. just relies on cliches about privilege, oppression, and uses "white" as a demeaning adjective to attack peterson.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087857)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:32 PM
Author: Domesticated cuck area

yeah, but he's good at being a grandstanding, uppity coon, and Peterson had absolutely no idea how to deal with it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087865)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:39 PM
Author: Floppy public bath dopamine

peterson was smart. if he responded in kind, it would feed into the left's fervent desire to paint him as a racist. dyson was trying to bait him into it.

the irony, of course, is that dyson made superfluous racist comments about peterson (e.g., calling him, twice, a "mean white man").

dyson was actually the one acting mean and unhinged, but if peterson called him an "angry black man," it would have been the end of the world. perfect illustration of hypocrisy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087897)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 20th, 2018 8:05 PM
Author: Bespoke Disturbing Dysfunction Elastic Band

Seriously, I watched that exchange and my thought was “this guy uses an incredible amount of words to say nothing.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36092589)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:37 PM
Author: ungodly pearly senate nibblets

“Second, it seems probable that this group will seek personal satisfaction and public recognition by aggressive conduct, which, although ostensibly directed at external prejudices and problems, will in fact be primarily motivated by the psychological needs of the members of the group to overcome feelings of inferiority caused by lack of success in their studies. Since the common denominator of the group of students with lower qualifications is one of race, this aggressive expression will undoubtedly take the form of racial demands – the employment of faculty on the basis of race, a marking system based on race, the establishment of a black curriculum and black law journal….”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087888)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:40 PM
Author: stimulating ebony windowlicker

xo Ted.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087904)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:41 PM
Author: ungodly pearly senate nibblets

actually a judge writing to Yale in 1969 about the probable effects of race-based affirmative action.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087908)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:49 PM
Author: Big-titted site

Where did you find this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087972)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:57 PM
Author: ungodly pearly senate nibblets

it's been bouncing around the internet for a couple of years. amazing letter written in 1969.

https://heterodoxacademy.org/the-amazing-1969-prophecy/

But as practiced in most of the top American universities, affirmative action also involves using different admissions standards for applicants of different races, which automatically creates differences in academic readiness and achievement. Although these gaps vary from college to college, studies have found that Asian students enter with combined math/verbal SAT scores on the order of 80 points higher than white students and 200 points higher than black students. A similar pattern occurs for high-school grades. These differences are large, and they matter: High-school grades and SAT scores predict later success as measured by college grades and graduation rates.

As a result of these disparate admissions standards, many students spend four years in a social environment where race conveys useful information about the academic capacity of their peers. People notice useful social cues, and one of the strongest causes of stereotypes is exposure to real group differences. If a school commits to doubling the number of black students, it will have to reach deeper into its pool of black applicants, admitting those with weaker qualifications, particularly if most other schools are doing the same thing. This is likely to make racial gaps larger, which would strengthen the negative stereotypes that students of color find when they arrive on campus.'

The immediate damage to the standards of Yale Law School needs no elaboration. But beyond this, it seems to me the admission policy adopted by the Law School faculty will serve to perpetuate the very ideas and prejudices it is designed to combat. If in a given class the great majority of the black students are at the bottom of the class, this factor is bound to instill, unconsciously at least, some sense of intellectual superiority among the white students and some sense of intellectual inferiority among the black students. Such a pairing in the same school of the brightest white students in the country with black students of mediocre academic qualifications is social experiment with loaded dice and a stacked deck. The faculty can talk around the clock about disadvantaged background, and it can excuse inferior performance because of poverty, environment, inadequate cultural tradition, lack of educational opportunity, etc. The fact remains that black and white students will be exposed to each other under circumstances in which demonstrated intellectual superiority rests with the whites.

No one can be expected to accept an inferior status willingly. The black students, unable to compete on even terms in the study of law, inevitably will seek other means to achieve recognition and self-expression. This is likely to take two forms. First, agitation to change the environment from one in which they are unable to compete to one in which they can. Demands will be made for elimination of competition, reduction in standards of performance, adoption of courses of study which do not require intensive legal analysis, and recognition for academic credit of sociological activities which have only an indirect relationship to legal training. Second, it seems probable that this group will seek personal satisfaction and public recognition by aggressive conduct, which, although ostensibly directed at external injustices and problems, will in fact be primarily motivated by the psychological needs of the members of the group to overcome feelings of inferiority caused by lack of success in their studies. Since the common denominator of the group of students with lower qualifications is one of race this aggressive expression will undoubtedly take the form of racial demands–the employment of faculty on the basis of race, a marking system based on race, the establishment of a black curriculum and a black law journal, an increase in black financial aid, and a rule against expulsion of black students who fail to satisfy minimum academic standards.

The American creed, one that Yale has proudly espoused, holds that an American should be judged as an individual and not as a member of a group. To me it seems axiomatic that a system which ignores this creed and introduces the factor of race in the selection of students for a professional school is inherently malignant, no matter how high-minded the purpose nor how benign the motives of those making the selection….

The present policy of admitting students on two bases and thereafter purporting to judge their performance on one basis is a highly explosive sociological experiment almost certain to achieve undesirable results.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36088026)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:48 PM
Author: Domesticated cuck area



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087964)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 1st, 2018 4:44 PM
Author: Floppy public bath dopamine

This is completely spot-on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36728815)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:38 PM
Author: Big-titted site

His points were wrong and silly, but he had funny moments. I guess it depends what you value.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087891)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:47 PM
Author: Fuchsia Beta Parlour

I can't stand watching him talk anymore. I've seen his one note act too many times on Real Time. I actually feel a little bad for him because I don't think he even knows how shitty his oratory is. he reminds me of someone who stutters.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087949)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:48 PM
Author: Marvelous immigrant base

The old white dude called Dyson a snake oil huckster.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087954)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 11:49 PM
Author: Domesticated cuck area

no one cared about what that fag kike had to say

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36087969)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 1st, 2018 4:29 PM
Author: Citrine lay



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36728774)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 1st, 2018 4:46 PM
Author: Floppy public bath dopamine

He’s the classic black preacher-type huckster who uses big words & fast talking to make himself seem smart, but says nothing of substance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36728820)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 20th, 2018 7:43 PM
Author: smoky sanctuary dragon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36092422)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 1st, 2018 4:49 PM
Author: French yapping quadroon

real talk: he steamrolled peterson with a wall of animated blather. in "debates" like that, you don't win by being a punch-pulling shy fag; you win by burying the other guy under a blizzard of rhetoric. dyson won, and it wasn't close. peterson sounded so feeble against his assault.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36728835)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 1st, 2018 5:42 PM
Author: Mustard incel boiling water

guy who believes dyson won

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981726&forum_id=2#36729048)