as i said, the most prestige is the RG-W combo.

Out of 17 I'd prob want 6 each of RG and W, 4 USO and 1 AO

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285050)

i'll take a wimbledon decima and a double career slam.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285073)

IRONSIDE NUMBAH 1

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285085)

8 W

4 U$O

3 AO

2 FO

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285518)

vs.

https://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/a/EV4ma/bjorn-borg-on-rafael-nadal-best-player-on-clay-ever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285667)

if dr finishes w 22 and gets the wimby decima, that's 10 W + 6 AO + 5 US + 1 RG. i'd just take one more coupe from the AO and leave it as is. wimby decima and 5x at each of next best two slams is prestigious as fuck, plus the double career slam

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285697)

unnnghhh thats arguably peRFect

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285714)

would being the outright leader at the three mainstream slams (and 4/5 majors+) and the absolute undisputed goat of grass and hc outweigh a W decima?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285783)

Out of 22 I'd probably go 2-7-7-6

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285716)

i can understand clay-court tennis not being someone's thing. i disagree with it because i think it's a beautiful game and its the best surface for learning, but i can understand it.

but the AO trolling is done solely to get under my skin and has no basis in reality. i'm sure this will make you do it more but it drives me insane because it's so retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4007150&forum_id=2#36285738)