Going to USAO was objectively bad decision
| ruddy pocket flask spot | 07/20/18 | | translucent box office | 07/20/18 | | thriller brindle menage sandwich | 07/20/18 | | ruddy pocket flask spot | 07/20/18 | | flirting corn cake | 07/21/18 | | Nofapping Pungent Garrison | 07/20/18 | | black cheese-eating quadroon | 07/20/18 | | ruddy pocket flask spot | 07/20/18 | | Underhanded ratface range | 07/20/18 | | ruddy pocket flask spot | 07/20/18 | | Snowy Shrine | 07/21/18 | | bistre sex offender field | 07/21/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2018 10:22 PM Author: ruddy pocket flask spot
Went to a large, big-city USAO 2 yrs ago, and 2.5 yrs out of law school. Job has been fun, but not fun enough to justify the shit-ton of hours. So my personal life kind of sucks and now I want to move back to my hometown.
The way that my office works, I can't really get marketable, impressive experience without putting in another 3-4 years.
So if I go back to a law firm now, I will probably be worse off from a career development perspective than if I had just stayed at the law firm to begin with. And of course, I've left at least 400k on the table.
But if I stay the 3-4 years to reap the career benefits, I'm going to be stuck working 60 hour weeks in a high COL city that I don't want to live in anymore.
lol @ lawyers.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4031406&forum_id=2#36468847) |
Date: July 21st, 2018 2:14 AM Author: bistre sex offender field
Did you not know this going in?
clerkship, 3-4 years in biglaw, as many years as possible in USAO until they make you a deputy chief or something, then back to biglaw as counsel, then pray that you're promoted to non-equity partner, then &c
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4031406&forum_id=2#36469528) |
|
|