\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Admit, waitlist or deny this Yale 250?

It can be easy to mistake positive economics for a science w...
Spectacular Balding Base
  07/22/18
Admit!
heady mischievous national security agency
  07/22/18
...
slimy big selfie
  07/22/18
Lmao
Infuriating Buck-toothed Meetinghouse
  07/22/18
I know right. Huh? What did he just say?
twinkling cracking lettuce
  07/22/18
He invented a fake scenario then suggests economics ought to...
Infuriating Buck-toothed Meetinghouse
  07/22/18
not only should is this an obvious deny, this fag's econ deg...
Embarrassed to the bone dilemma
  07/22/18
i took the LSAT 8 years ago but this gave me flashbacks of a...
Brilliant Partner
  07/22/18
...
Spectacular Balding Base
  07/22/18
...
Spectacular Balding Base
  07/22/18
LJL
Maniacal box office boiling water
  07/22/18
That's a ding even for a Cooley 250
coiffed adventurous business firm roommate
  07/22/18
...
marvelous personal credit line
  07/22/18
...
Spectacular Balding Base
  07/22/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:05 AM
Author: Spectacular Balding Base

It can be easy to mistake positive economics for a science without values. Its language is mathematics and a formula does not declare if the phenomena it describes is good or bad. However, there is a difference between describing rates of spending or economic growth and attempting to quantify something like human development which is composed of more than just strict economic factors.

On its face, the Human Development Index (HDI) is, like the Gini Index or Consumer Price Index, a silent formula, but closer inspection reveals that value judgements can be written in the language of mathematics.

A country’s HDI is found by taking the geometric mean of three scaled indicators: income per capita, life expectancy, and education. The HDI’s method of aggregating these indicators allows improvements in one indicator to compensate for a decline in another. This substitutability implies that a reduction in life expectancy can be justified by economic growth and also allows the monetary value of human life to be calculated. Doing this calculation makes the troubling suggestion that human life is worth less in poorer countries.

All of this is implicit in the formula’s construction.

Yet, this is not necessarily a flaw in economics or the math that underlies its concepts. In fact, the ability to express a value judgement in a formula is a powerful tool. However, in order to use it responsibly, implicit judgments must be made explicit lest the formula be allowed to dictate our values rather than the other way around.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473443)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:06 AM
Author: heady mischievous national security agency

Admit!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473446)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 5:41 PM
Author: slimy big selfie



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36476453)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:09 AM
Author: Infuriating Buck-toothed Meetinghouse

Lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473455)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:10 AM
Author: twinkling cracking lettuce

I know right. Huh? What did he just say?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473465)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:15 AM
Author: Infuriating Buck-toothed Meetinghouse

He invented a fake scenario then suggests economics ought to thereby become radically shitlib because hey it's already inherently normative which means literally anything goes utopia tomorrow or violence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473478)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:39 AM
Author: Embarrassed to the bone dilemma

not only should is this an obvious deny, this fag's econ degree should be revoked

nobody is making policy decisions around this retarded index

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473547)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:41 AM
Author: Brilliant Partner

i took the LSAT 8 years ago but this gave me flashbacks of a long logical reasoning prompt. still not really sure what this was even about.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473555)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 10:38 AM
Author: Spectacular Balding Base



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36474248)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 2:48 PM
Author: Spectacular Balding Base



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475496)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 2:55 PM
Author: Maniacal box office boiling water

LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475535)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 4:04 PM
Author: coiffed adventurous business firm roommate

That's a ding even for a Cooley 250

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475890)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 4:07 PM
Author: marvelous personal credit line



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475898)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 5:26 PM
Author: Spectacular Balding Base



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36476356)