Reminder: The only good evidence for a Stable of Alts we ever had, Lawman denied
| Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | maize preventive strike | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | mildly autistic business firm | 08/21/18 | | arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman | 08/21/18 | | out-of-control senate trust fund | 08/22/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | Ultramarine aphrodisiac depressive library | 08/21/18 | | Twisted genital piercing | 08/21/18 | | Stirring quadroon mad cow disease | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | Ultramarine aphrodisiac depressive library | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | lascivious slippery idea he suggested | 08/21/18 | | Stirring quadroon mad cow disease | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | Orange skinny woman | 08/21/18 | | Beady-eyed confused meetinghouse | 08/21/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 21st, 2018 2:54 PM Author: Orange skinny woman
The crimes and faults of his allies (Watchmen), Lawman helped cover up.
Refresher: Watchmen voted for himself 20+ times in an MPM round (the number of votes was much MUCH higher than any other contest). Lawman8 denied the existence of the Stable of Alts (his own theory). We have not had any other evidence of a 20+ Alt Stable.
This, supposedly from a man of God...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656225) |
Date: August 21st, 2018 3:00 PM Author: arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman
So much fake news, it’s hard to know where to start.
How about the haters get their story straight? Is sockpuppeting with lots of alts rampant on here, as some claim? Or is the “stable of alts” some paranoid conspiracy theory? You seem to be claiming the latter, but like wack a mole, someone will sprout up and say you idiot, we all know there’s a ton of sockpuppeting that goes on here.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656266) |
|
Date: August 21st, 2018 3:25 PM Author: Orange skinny woman
Date: December 20th, 2017 1:45 PM
Author: are we not all but thai boys (askav)
Interesting. In the first round, he got 21 more votes than you. And that was using all of your alts, too. How do we know that you were using all of your alts? Why, look at the vote totals from the first round.
histogram: https://i.imgur.com/5MND1Aj.png
vote totals from 1st round of MPM 2016:
55
57
43
29
46
36
41
31
35
32
31
36
34
34
38
49
61
44
54
61
48
58
50
58
47
35
34
28
40
36
46
48
84
34
35
44
45
40
40
34
41
41
36
25
35
41
31
39
52
46
31
36
39
37
36
39
41
34
37
43
29
29
36
38
Any of these stand out? Now, I'm no "math guy," so someone correct me if I'm wrong. Is there a reason to suppose vote totals in the first round of MPM would be normally distributed? Is there a reason to think they wouldn't be? histogram suggests a bit of a left skew, but i'm no MFE here.
At any rate, if normally distributed: the mean of these totals is 41, with a fairly tight standard error of 1.3, and a population SD of 10.
Every single outcome in these 64 first round votes is within +2 or -2 SD of the mean. Every one that is, except for WMTP's round.
So which is it? Does WMTP bring just SO MUCH HEAT that he's a >+4SD, 84 vote event? People care THAT MUCH MORE about him in 2016 than they do about Johnsmeyer, Evan, etc.? Or does he have a stable of alts that he uses incessantly and the numbers clearly bear that out?
The bort may never know.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3835483&forum_id=2#34967236)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656443) |
|
Date: August 21st, 2018 3:30 PM Author: Orange skinny woman
Date: August 21st, 2018 3:28 PM
Author: lawman8
This is not the thread the OP is about. I’m talking about my response at the time, which I was proud of, and which you are so upset about.
With the disclaimer that I forget everything that happened back then, just looking at the post you linked, it is clear that SOMEONE was using a stable of alts to support Watchmen.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656459)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656477) |
|
Date: August 21st, 2018 3:08 PM Author: mildly autistic business firm
It is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that SOMEONE was only voting for watchmen and doing so at a ratio undeniably higher than literally any other match up.
Does that smell of alt hacking or not?
Sad that you are being a snake and avoiding the question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656331) |
|
Date: August 21st, 2018 3:17 PM Author: arrogant cordovan lodge patrolman
You don’t know the first thing about me if you think I don’t rock the boat.
Also, Watchmen had nothing to do with me becoming a mod. It was actually caused by one of my devoted haters.
Your buddy here bumped this thread:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3838939&mc=4&forum_id=2
You can see that even 9 months ago, I was saying exactly what I’m saying here: bring up the thread. Why can’t you do that??
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656386) |
|
|