she's seems great

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872291)

1. she's a bleeding vagina w/ crazy eyes

2. her kids are all niggers

she's a nutcase. 'catholic' is not a selling point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872309)

here's something you might comprehend: rook, risten.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872361)

You really don't get it, do you?

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084886&forum_id=2#36870762

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872324)

is there anyone ITT who isn't a fucking gook?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872367)

Of course they won't, that's just biographical background to render the real allegation more plausible:

A weeping, hysterical gay man bravely comes forward to testify about all of the virulently anti-queer things she said to him. (And then multiple well-groomed trannies start coming out of the wood-work to back him up--while also sliding in a bunch of testimony about how incredibly difficult their lives are, the rates at which trannies are murdered in this country, etc etc etc.)

You think the GOP won't cuck on LGBT shit in 2018? Have you even been paying attention for the last decade?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872378)

Yes, I do, actually. I think they stand ready to cuck on both with equal aplomb, and I have no idea why any reasonable observer would think they have enough spine to stand strong on gay shit at this point. The GOP lives in mortal fear of being called Nazis, and the Left stands prepared to accuse Republicans of the unforgiveable crime of bigotry against [Insert Sacred Cow Class] at a moment's notice.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872407)

This won't be portrayed as a religious freedom issue by the Left. They'll dogwhistle it, but they're not going to make the mistake of calling her a religious nut directly--that will just be a subtle backdrop to render more believable the allegation that SHE'S AN EXTREMIST HOMOPHOBIC BIGOT WHO DEEPLY DESPISES GAY PEOPLE TO THE POINT WHERE SHE ACTIVELY SUPPORTS SCIENTIFICALLY DISCREDITED OVERTLY ANTI-GAY POLICIES THAT HAVE *LITERALLY* BEEN USED TO KILL CONFUSED AND STRUGGLING HOMOSEXUALS FOR DECADES!

Are you really this fucking retarded?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872452)

The fact that you think she's just some run-of-the-mill "Catholic" tells me everything I need to know about how dumb and uninformed you really are. Pelosi is a fucking "Catholic"--i.e., a C&E non-believer who doesn't really stand for anything. Barrett can easily be painted as an extreme borderline cultist who is nothing like your average American Catholic, and there will be no shortage of Catholics on the Left who will come forward and make that point again and again as much as needed... although again, that will all be played as backstory. "This isn't about putting on trial Catholicism or mainstream religious beliefs," etc.

Idiots like you who can't see the forest for the trees are a huge part of the problem.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872491)

(Guy who is apparently suggesting that Scalia would be confirmable in 2018?)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872508)

Gorsuch wasn't the swing vote to save Roe, and he wasn't replacing a "moderate" on the court. That was also before they realized JUST how cucky and shook Senate Republicans actually are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36873008)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085308&forum_id=2#36872992)