The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
time for tonight's stupid m&a q
| fighting appetizing stage pisswyrm | 09/24/18 |
| fighting appetizing stage pisswyrm | 09/24/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 24th, 2018 3:34 AM Author: fighting appetizing stage pisswyrm would it be normal for a law firm representing a company to draft an agreement for a transaction between shareholders and then affirmatively deny it's either party's attorney?
it's an spa done to facilitate a larger transaction. and firm reps the company in that transaction. wouldn't normally need company to be party to this spa. but should i add it as one, if i'm putting in the "hey, assholes, we're not your lawyers" notice (which i know we need). technically there are some reps that involve the co. so i could probably add. i just don't know what's normal here. m&a agreement #2- whoo. |
 |
Date: September 24th, 2018 3:55 AM Author: fighting appetizing stage pisswyrm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085783&forum_id=2#36875636) |