The numbers don't lie: Women are super into hardcore porn. This is surprising for a few reasons. For starters, while we typically think of "gangbang," "fisting" and "double penetration" as hallmarks of male-oriented hardcore porn, it looks like ladies are getting off to the rough stuff as well. In fact, they might even be getting off to it more often than dudes are.

https://mic.com/articles/122962/pornhub-study-reveals-women-want-hardcore-porn#.aU7BzILfM

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948164)

https://cdnio.luscious.net/Mid_90s_Kevin_Nash/753/lusciousnet_lusciousnet_tumblr_nov90yab9o1u2bk5no1_400_743889637.gif

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948572)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948611)

study doesn’t mention how long videos clicked on were viewed - that seems relevant to erotic desire

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948588)

Poast absolutely reeks of latkes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948610)

https://yuki.la/gif/10741160

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948676)

I just assume it's standard at this point

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948715)

female sexuality seems like it's based on what she's been mentally conditioned to believe is sexy. girls didn't want to be slapped around, choked, and fucked in the ass until they were systematically brainwashed by pop culture and the media into thinking that stuff is sexy. sure, they've always liked to be submissive and dominated by a strong man, but not this kind of over the top degenerate shit

probably just another one of those evo psych things where females evolved to be extremely good at adapting to their surroundings

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948807)

Surely rape and violence play a big part of their evolution

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948838)

foot binding, corsets, clitoral mutilation, plump renaissance women, weird african tribal shit, different cultures and different time periods value different aspects of women

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948841)

there is a difference here though, because female sexuality is based on the sensation of being acted upon, whereas male sexuality is based upon being the actor who is acting upon the female object. it seems like the former is much more dependent on socialization than the latter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948874)

21st century american men have been conditioned to lust after "thicc thots" (translation in practical reality: 200 lb flabby pale office shrews) in the span of 20 years

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948881)

your other examples (foot binding, corsets) are good though, and i think you're right about that sort of socialization of male sexual desire

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948948)

so much of porn is artifice: cumshots? every single movie ending with that?

male sexual preference is extremely malleable across the ages. nobody did blowjobs before, now it's the next step after making out and firmly entrenched in what males want.

both men and women's fashion styles change drastically and obviously each generation. fashion is the outward apparel that turns the opposite sex on. infinitely malleable. obviously our bodies are not as malleable, but emphasis on thicc and curves has definitely increased.

i generally hate retarded xo theories about women's sexuality

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36948997)

dudes being attracted to women that they're typically personally exposed to is completely different from women being socialized to sexual practices they've never themselves been directly exposed to. it's why we jerk off to the thought of some 6/10 chick in our office, even though we don't think she's as objectively sexy as a 9/10

and blowjobs have been around since the beginning of time in every culture....iirc even chimps and bonobos perform oral sex on each other. yeah there's more BJs happening today, but that's because we are much more sexually promiscuous in general

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36949082)

nobody who can make consistently cogent observations about women and sex is ever gonna be a legitimate incel, even if they are ugly as fuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36949183)

also you're ignoring that the causality goes both ways. men like what's around them, but also men lead the women around them into dressing up in ways that they like. men are fucking braindead sheep, they just listen to what other dudes like and think is cool. "hey bra look at me, i titty-fucked that girl hard and then anal'd her in the ass before i did a fucking cumshot on her face like the porno movie i just watched!" -> "yes a woman in a corset/hijab is the height of femininity and innocence, so i'm glad i could secure one or the bros are going to laugh at me for being with an unchaste woman!" -> "i just want a thicc thot with curves like those rappers have! yeah i want them to twerk around and eat twinkies between squat-sets at the gym! that's the only way to maek it!"

god this is so fucking dumb in the first place. i didn't read the article in but i'm absolutely certain they only did a % of women who watch porn like X porn. not % of all women like X porn. it's just the really freaky women who watch porn in the first place, so it's unsurprising they gravitate towards extreme porn. the vast majority of violent/fetish porn is obviously consumed by men.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36949123)

do you think your 1950s grandpa would be into instagram models with butts that look like they've been injected with silicone?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36949010)

and yes i bet my grandpa liked pawgs too. lord only knows what your autistic forefathers liked

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36949059)

why would anyone 'lie' about this, retard?

a guy wrote a whole book about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36954175)

But why are so many women so keen to see videos tagged with, say, "painful anal crying", "public disgrace" or "extreme brutal gangbang"? Or content marked as "forced" or "rape"? The feminist porn movement – one focusing on equality and empowerment – might be thriving, but the data shows, proportionally, women are also consuming much more of the most extreme misogynistic sexual material available online."

https://www.vice.com/en_nz/article/bm9w7v/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36954185)

what does 'pornhub' have to gain by conspiring to falsely depict women's interest in rape porn, particularly?

this is completely consistent with women's THOROUGHLY documented interest in such things (50 Shades of Grey, rape fantasy, etc).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36954212)

Yeah what could Pornhub have to gain by getting across the message that it's completely normal for everyone - even women - to constantly look at pornography, including extreme and violent pornography. I must be a "retard" for not taking their word for it lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36954219)

riiight, nobody is actually looking at porn. it's all a forcememe by pornhub. you figured it out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36954242)

serious q, is there a third possibility other than "nobody is actually looking at porn" and "number one search term for women is extreme gangbang?" Or are those the only two options

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4096295&forum_id=2#36954255)