The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Nine SC justices isn't cool. You know what's cool? 900 SC justices.
| house-broken round eye | 09/21/20 |
| coral aromatic boiling water | 09/21/20 |
| ungodly big abode juggernaut | 09/21/20 |
| Deep Hall | 09/21/20 |
| Diverse idea he suggested digit ratio | 09/21/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 21st, 2020 7:57 AM Author: house-broken round eye (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629553&forum_id=2#40958005) |
Date: September 21st, 2020 7:57 AM Author: coral aromatic boiling water (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629553&forum_id=2#40958007) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 8:04 AM Author: ungodly big abode juggernaut interesting idea - 900 justices on the Court and any given case is decided by 9 of them selected at random. No en banc review. Writ grant requires 451 votes in favor of taking the case.
This would strongly discourage attempts to make major political changes through the Court, because it's so unpredictable. It would encourage the Court to decide normal questions of law. And you can easily find 900 lawyers who are smart enough to sit on SCOTUS as a part time gig. |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 9:04 AM Author: Deep Hall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629553&forum_id=2#40958178) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 9:05 AM Author: Diverse idea he suggested digit ratio we actually need 9,000 and 8991 of them have to hail from Berkeley California. Fair is fair. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629553&forum_id=2#40958183) |