LOL at Republicans and this SCOTUS thing. These 2016 vids are HILARIOUS.
| Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | bateful range trump supporter | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | yellow tripping heaven | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | brass bisexual selfie | 09/21/20 | | boyish french puppy antidepressant drug | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | light incel | 09/21/20 | | boyish french puppy antidepressant drug | 09/21/20 | | bateful range trump supporter | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | light incel | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | insanely creepy lodge | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | insanely creepy lodge | 09/23/20 | | boyish french puppy antidepressant drug | 09/21/20 | | crimson forum international law enforcement agency | 09/21/20 | | floppy sick mad-dog skullcap plaza | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Jet-lagged irate state shitlib | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | bateful range trump supporter | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/23/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Frisky Area Dopamine | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | useless crusty pocket flask home | 09/21/20 | | beady-eyed learning disabled bawdyhouse | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | beady-eyed learning disabled bawdyhouse | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | beady-eyed learning disabled bawdyhouse | 09/21/20 | | mint business firm haunted graveyard | 09/21/20 | | disturbing dashing kitchen | 09/21/20 | | soul-stirring nighttime parlour | 09/21/20 | | Gaped racy karate wrinkle | 09/21/20 | | useless crusty pocket flask home | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | yellow tripping heaven | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | yellow tripping heaven | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | Concupiscible territorial casino | 09/21/20 | | Twinkling property | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | Multi-colored main people locus | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | yellow tripping heaven | 09/21/20 | | awkward indian lodge | 09/21/20 | | insanely creepy lodge | 09/23/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/21/20 | | lavender house-broken office twinkling uncleanness | 09/21/20 | | Razzle-dazzle goal in life center | 09/23/20 | | Thriller Stage Stain | 09/23/20 | | chocolate mood | 09/23/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 11:55 AM Author: Thriller Stage Stain
Right, the Dems were getting fucked at the time and said DON'T DO THIS!
But now, after doing it, the Republicans are like, PSYCHE! We don't give a shit about the people's vote. Fuck the people.
That is such a fucking joke.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959109) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:13 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle goal in life center
Ummm no....in 2016 you guys bleated that the GOP senate MUST confirm Scalias replacement in an election year. Repubs in 2020: sounds good to us!
LoL at this 105 IQ rube whining that mean old Mitch isn’t playing fair!
🤣🤣🤣
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959196) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:51 PM Author: Thriller Stage Stain
I mean, this place is a fucking joke.
Of course that is DEMS reaction in 2020, because the Republicans in 2016 told the world that you cannot nominate a justice in an election year because the American people need to be heard [A rule they completely made up]. And they then blocked the nominee 8 months out. Now, in 2020, with 5 weeks before the election they're like, just kidding. We can do it.
Only a legitimate retard doesn't see that hypocrisy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959414) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:28 PM Author: Thriller Stage Stain
Serious question. Are you retarded?
Because I'd like to know how you think that matters in regard to these Republican Senators' position regarding this issue.
As an initial matter, your response to the OP indicates a 145 LSAT score.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959286) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:30 PM Author: Twinkling property
It's literally a BAM letter.
=============
We write as constitutional law scholars to urge President Obama and the United States Senate to fulfill their constitutional duties with regard to the vacancy that exists on the Supreme Court because of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. We do not write in support of or in opposition to any specific candidate. Rather, our position is simply that the President has the duty to ominate a candidate to fill the current Supreme Court vacancy and the Senate has the duty to “advise and consent,” which means to hold hearings and to vote on the nominee.
We urge the President to nominate as soon as reasonably possible an individual to fill the vacancy existing on the Court and the Senate to hold hearings and vote on the nominee.
Signed,
Dmitry Bam; University of Maine School of Law
Erwin Chemerinsky; Founding Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law; and Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law University; University of California, Irvine School of Law
Gene Nichol; Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor; University of North Carolina School of Law
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959299) |
|
Date: September 23rd, 2020 10:25 AM Author: Twinkling property
lol. Chemerinsky six years ago begged RBG to step down.
-----------------
Much depends on Ginsburg
By ERWIN CHEMERINSKY
MARCH 15, 20141:44 PM
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg should retire from the Supreme Court after the completion of the current term in June. She turned 81 on Saturday and by all accounts she is healthy and physically and mentally able to continue. But only by resigning this summer can she ensure that a Democratic president will be able to choose a successor who shares her views and values.
A great deal turns on who picks Ginsburg’s successor. There are, for example, four likely votes to overturn Roe vs. Wade on the current court: Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel A. Alito Jr. If a Republican president selects Ginsburg’s replacement, that justice easily could be the fifth vote needed to allow the government to prohibit all abortions. On many cases — including ones involving environmental law, healthcare, gay marriage, the death penalty and the rights of those in Guantanamo — the four liberal justices have joined with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy for a progressive result.
But if a conservative had been occupying Ginsburg’s seat when the court heard those cases, the rulings might well have been very different, and if a conservative takes her seat when she leaves, they might not survive.
There likely will be many calls, publicly and privately, for Justice Ginsburg to resign before President Obama leaves the White House to prevent the risk of a Republican being able to appoint her successor. But simply leaving before the next election isn’t enough. If Ginsburg waits until 2016 to announce her retirement, there is a real chance that Republicans would delay the confirmation process to block an outgoing president from being able to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. In fact, the process for confirming nominees for judicial vacancies usually largely shuts down the summer before a presidential election.
Moreover, there is a distinct possibility that Democrats will not keep the Senate in the November 2014 elections. The current Senate has 53 Democrats, two independents who vote with the Democrats and 45 Republicans. But in the November 2014 elections, Republicans have a far greater likelihood of gaining seats in the Senate than the Democrats. One recent study identified nine seats held by Democrats that could be won by Republicans, but only two seats occupied by Republicans that might be taken by Democrats.
So long as the Democrats control the Senate, President Obama can have virtually anyone he wants confirmed for the Supreme Court. There has been only one filibuster against a Supreme Court nominee, and that was to block Justice Abe Fortas’ elevation to chief justice, not to block his initial appointment. There were 48 votes against Thomas and 42 against Alito, but Democrats filibustered neither. Besides, if Democrats have control of the Senate, they could change the rules to eliminate the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees, just as they did for lower federal court judges and presidential appointments to executive positions.
In the end, the only way to ensure that President Obama can pick someone who will carry on in Justice Ginsburg’s tradition is for the vacancy to occur this summer. Indeed, Justice Stephen G. Breyer, who will turn 76 this summer, should also carefully consider the possibility of stepping down this year.
Some might question whether a justice should be so calculating in choosing when to retire. But not doing so ignores the reality that ideology matters enormously in Supreme Court decision-making. This is nothing new; ideology always has mattered, and which president fills vacancies on the court can have an impact for decades. If, for example, Al Gore or John Kerry rather than President George W. Bush had replaced William Rehnquist and Sandra Day O’Connor in 2005, a liberal majority would likely have endured on the court for the next few decades. Conversely, if John McCain had replaced David Souter and John Paul Stevens, there would be a solid conservative majority and Roe vs. Wade surely would have been overruled already.
I do not minimize how hard it will be for Justice Ginsburg to step down from a job that she loves and has done so well since 1993. But the best way for her to advance all the things she has spent her life working for is to ensure that a Democratic president picks her successor. The way to facilitate that is for her to resign this summer.
Erwin Chemerinsky is dean of the UC Irvine School of Law.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40971581)
|
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:41 PM Author: Thriller Stage Stain
Listen, STOOPID. If Garland was put before the Senate and became a justice - LIKE HE SHOULD HAVE, then no one would be complaining about Trump and Mitch pulling this shit now.
BUT THEY DID PULL THIS SHIT. So, they don't get to then say, we were kidding 4 years ago. The American people can fuck off this time. It's a joke that isn't fooling anybody other than a retarded RESULTS ORIENTED SHORT-TERM SMALL-DICKED GOP stalwart.
And now, it's going to be a total shit show. A Senate majority will NEVER pass a nomination from the other party ever again.
And the DEMs are going to win the Senate and wreck the fucking country now by packing the court and bringing PR & DC in as states.
All of this shit is going to happen because these retarded Republican Senators are fucking hypocrites to the core.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959354) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:46 PM Author: Thriller Stage Stain
No, you fucking retard.
There is NO RULE against doing it in an election year, until MITCH DECLARED a new rule. And now, after making up the rule in 2016 and the GOP going on record about it, now in 2020 they're like, FUCK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
That is hypocrisy. The Dems didn't do anything other than take it up the ass in 2016 like a bunch of bitches.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959380) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:54 PM Author: Thriller Stage Stain
Bro, he said what he said. Your HYPO is meaningless.
His 2 positions in 2016 and 2020 are complete opposites. And frankly, are such a joke, that any serious Republican should have grabbed him in advance and said, don't fucking do this.
It will fuck the country when the Dems win the Senate.
Which they are going to do.
So, fucking dumb. This entire thing will be a disaster for the GOP. Will likely kill their party.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959447) |
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 12:51 PM Author: Gaped racy karate wrinkle
Just DC and PR. That's not enough of a cost.
Let me introduce you to the two senators each from the following newly formed states:
Miami
Tampa
Orlando
Atlanta
Birmingham
Memphis
Nashville
Little Rock
Austin
Dallas
San Antonio
El Paso
Rio Grande Valley
St. Louis
Kansas City
Milwaukee
Madison
Cleveland
Columbus
Cincinnati
Indianapolis
Charlotte
Research Triangle
Pittsburg
Philadelphia
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959417)
|
|
Date: September 21st, 2020 1:02 PM Author: yellow tripping heaven
What military?
The budget is paid for by the tax revenue of blue states.
Good luck finding loyal soliders as soon as that paycheck, housing allowance, and TriCare DRIES THE FUCK UP!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4629655&forum_id=2#40959496) |
|
|